Jonathan Roof

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1989-01-23

Age (2027)38

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	24	A+/A2 orgs	344	.254/.324/.381	6	5	59	—	.212/.266/.314
2014	25	AA/A+2 orgs	438	.278/.365/.423	7	3	78	—	.236/.298/.347
2015	26	AAA/AA2 orgs	348	.223/.294/.301	3	6	43	—	.205/.256/.274

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2010	21	A	Hickory Crawdads	—	143	125	32	4	0	0	13	14	2	4	5	256	336	288	624	32	286	10	9	287	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	ROK	AZL Rangers	—	15	14	5	1	0	0	1	3	0	0	0	357	400	429	829	71	455	20	7	373	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A+	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	47	43	8	2	0	0	3	9	0	0	0	186	239	233	472	47	235	19	6	215	-3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A	Hickory Crawdads	—	258	236	65	15	0	2	12	43	1	15	5	275	313	364	678	89	323	17	5	294	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA	Tucson Padres	—	138	120	30	2	0	0	15	19	3	1	1	250	348	267	614	17	297	14	11	294	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	22	21	7	2	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	333	364	429	792	95	350	5	5	354	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+	Clearwater Threshers	—	275	248	61	11	3	4	24	34	0	4	4	246	312	363	675	117	269	12	9	302	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	69	59	17	4	0	2	5	8	3	1	2	288	373	458	831	169	294	12	7	362	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AA	Portland Sea Dogs	—	214	188	48	11	2	3	19	46	5	1	3	255	340	383	723	128	324	21	9	325	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+	Salem Red Sox	—	224	193	58	15	2	4	27	32	1	2	1	301	389	461	850	161	338	14	12	374	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	180	168	36	7	0	2	8	33	1	2	0	214	254	292	546	77	252	18	4	244	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA	Portland Sea Dogs	—	168	141	33	4	2	1	20	19	2	4	2	234	337	312	649	78	260	11	12	294	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2010	21	A MLE	Hickory Crawdads	—	143	130	32	4	0	0	8	19	2	4	5	246	300	277	577	31	276	13	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	ROK MLE	AZL Rangers	—	15	14	4	1	0	0	1	4	0	0	0	286	333	357	690	71	358	27	7	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A+ MLE	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	47	44	6	1	0	0	2	13	0	0	0	136	174	159	333	23	208	28	4	164	-3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	Hickory Crawdads	—	258	240	55	13	0	1	8	59	1	15	5	229	257	296	553	67	275	23	3	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA MLE	Tucson Padres	—	138	124	29	2	0	0	11	25	3	1	1	234	312	250	562	16	289	18	8	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ MLE	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	22	21	7	2	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	333	364	429	792	95	312	5	5	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	275	255	52	10	2	3	17	49	0	4	4	204	254	294	548	90	236	18	6	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A MLE	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	69	61	15	3	0	2	3	11	3	1	2	246	313	393	707	148	253	16	4	312	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	AA MLE	Portland Sea Dogs	—	214	194	43	9	2	2	13	58	5	1	3	222	288	320	607	98	296	27	6	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ MLE	Salem Red Sox	—	224	204	51	12	2	3	16	45	1	2	1	250	308	373	680	123	295	20	7	299	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	180	170	32	6	0	2	6	41	1	2	0	188	220	259	479	71	233	23	3	210	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA MLE	Portland Sea Dogs	—	168	148	33	3	2	1	13	24	2	4	2	223	294	291	585	68	245	14	8	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A MLE	2 teams	—	158	144	35	4	0	0	9	24	2	4	5	243	297	271	568	28	289	15	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A RAW	2 teams	—	158	139	37	5	0	0	14	17	2	4	5	266	342	302	644	36	301	11	9	295	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	2 teams	—	305	284	61	14	0	1	10	72	1	15	5	215	244	275	519	60	279	24	3	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A RAW	2 teams	—	305	279	73	17	0	2	15	52	1	15	5	262	302	344	646	82	310	17	5	282	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	160	146	35	3	0	0	11	26	3	1	1	240	306	260	567	21	292	16	7	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	160	141	37	4	0	0	16	20	3	1	1	262	350	291	641	28	306	12	10	302	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	344	316	67	13	2	5	20	60	3	5	6	212	265	313	579	101	243	17	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	344	307	78	15	3	6	29	42	3	5	6	254	324	381	706	127	274	12	8	314	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	438	398	94	21	4	6	29	103	6	3	4	236	298	354	652	118	301	24	7	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	438	381	106	26	4	7	46	78	6	3	4	278	365	423	787	144	331	18	11	350	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	348	318	65	10	2	2	19	65	3	6	2	204	256	267	523	63	247	19	5	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	348	309	69	11	2	3	28	52	3	6	2	223	294	301	595	78	256	15	8	268	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A MLE	2 teams	—	158	146	35	4	0	0	9	24	2	4	5	240	297	267	564	27	284	15	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	2 teams	—	305	291	61	14	0	1	10	72	1	15	5	210	244	268	512	58	265	24	3	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	160	145	35	3	0	0	11	26	3	1	1	241	306	262	568	21	292	16	7	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	344	318	67	13	2	5	20	60	3	5	6	211	265	311	577	101	239	17	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	438	400	94	21	4	6	29	103	6	3	4	235	298	352	650	117	295	24	7	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	348	323	65	10	2	2	19	65	3	6	2	201	256	263	519	62	239	19	5	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1753	1606	357	65	8	14	98	350	18	34	23	222	275	299	574	77	273	20	6	253	57	-89	-2	+0	+19	+38	-3.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	595	132	24	3	5	36	130	7	13	9	222	274	297	572	76	273	20	6	253	57	-33	-1	+0	+7	+14	-1.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAAPawtucket Red Sox · 180 PAwOBA .240 → .210 (−30)K% 18.3% → 23.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.33%	÷0.956	×1.200	—	—	23.02%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.44%	÷0.996	×0.690	—	×1.018	3.14%
HBP% /PA	0.56%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	0.53%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷0.989	×0.930	×0.965	×1.018	18.46%
Doubles /BIP	5.19%	÷0.867	×0.830	×0.965	×1.018	4.87%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.012	×0.970	×0.965	×1.018	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.48%	÷1.012	×0.840	—	×1.018	1.25%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 98, 2B 73, 3B 102, K 91, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.

Result: wOBA .240 → .210; ISO .077 → .068; BABIP .252 → .233. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 168 PAwOBA .291 → .256 (−35)K% 11.3% → 14.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.31%	÷0.983	×1.220	—	—	14.04%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.90%	÷1.067	×0.700	—	×0.988	7.72%
HBP% /PA	1.19%	—	×0.850	—	×0.988	1.00%
Singles /BIP	21.31%	÷0.970	×0.970	×0.983	×0.988	20.70%
Doubles /BIP	3.28%	÷1.026	×0.860	×0.983	×0.988	2.67%
Triples /BIP	1.64%	÷1.150	×0.950	×0.983	×0.988	1.32%
Home runs /BIP	0.82%	÷0.994	×0.780	—	×0.988	0.64%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 94, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 97, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.

Result: wOBA .291 → .256; ISO .078 → .066; BABIP .260 → .245. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Salem Red Sox · 224 PAwOBA .370 → .299 (−70)K% 14.3% → 20.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.29%	÷0.998	×1.420	—	—	20.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.05%	÷1.031	×0.630	—	×0.978	7.20%
HBP% /PA	0.45%	—	×0.860	—	×0.978	0.38%
Singles /BIP	22.98%	÷1.015	×0.940	×0.999	×0.978	20.79%
Doubles /BIP	9.32%	÷0.997	×0.830	×0.999	×0.978	7.58%
Triples /BIP	1.24%	÷0.900	×0.800	×0.999	×0.978	1.08%
Home runs /BIP	2.48%	÷1.025	×0.900	—	×0.978	2.13%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 103, 2B 99, 3B 80, K 100, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .370 → .299; ISO .161 → .135; BABIP .338 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 214 PAwOBA .316 → .267 (−50)K% 21.5% → 26.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.50%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	26.90%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.88%	÷1.041	×0.700	—	×0.998	5.96%
HBP% /PA	2.34%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	1.98%
Singles /BIP	22.54%	÷1.014	×0.970	×0.988	×0.998	21.25%
Doubles /BIP	7.75%	÷1.025	×0.860	×0.988	×0.998	6.41%
Triples /BIP	1.41%	÷0.900	×0.950	×0.988	×0.998	1.47%
Home runs /BIP	2.11%	÷0.959	×0.780	—	×0.998	1.72%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 103, 2B 105, 3B 80, K 95, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.

Result: wOBA .316 → .267; ISO .128 → .107; BABIP .324 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Clearwater Threshers · 275 PAwOBA .296 → .240 (−56)K% 12.4% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.36%	÷0.980	×1.420	—	—	17.92%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.73%	÷1.045	×0.750	—	×0.988	6.19%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.09%	÷0.988	×0.920	×0.950	×0.988	17.56%
Doubles /BIP	5.14%	÷0.978	×0.960	×0.950	×0.988	4.74%
Triples /BIP	1.40%	÷0.900	×0.810	×0.950	×0.988	1.18%
Home runs /BIP	1.87%	÷1.253	×0.880	—	×0.988	1.30%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 151, 1B 98, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 96, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .296 → .240; ISO .117 → .093; BABIP .269 → .236. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ALakewood BlueClaws · 69 PAwOBA .362 → .312 (−50)K% 11.6% → 15.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.59%	÷1.009	×1.340	—	—	15.40%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.25%	÷1.021	×0.660	—	×0.980	4.59%
HBP% /PA	4.35%	—	×0.770	—	×0.980	3.28%
Singles /BIP	21.57%	÷0.989	×0.920	×0.968	×0.980	19.04%
Doubles /BIP	7.84%	÷0.988	×0.820	×0.968	×0.980	6.17%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.065	×0.940	×0.968	×0.980	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.92%	÷0.801	×0.820	—	×0.980	3.93%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 60, 1B 98, 2B 98, 3B 113, K 102, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.968.

Result: wOBA .362 → .312; ISO .169 → .161; BABIP .294 → .253. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAATucson Padres · 138 PAwOBA .287 → .257 (−30)K% 13.8% → 18.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.77%	÷0.979	×1.290	—	—	18.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.87%	÷1.052	×0.710	—	×1.050	7.70%
HBP% /PA	2.17%	—	×0.980	—	×1.050	2.24%
Singles /BIP	27.72%	÷1.007	×0.900	×1.046	×1.050	27.19%
Doubles /BIP	1.98%	÷1.013	×0.810	×1.046	×1.050	1.74%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.046	×1.050	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.050	×0.780	—	×1.050	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 101, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 96, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.

Result: wOBA .287 → .257; ISO .017 → .014; BABIP .297 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Lake Elsinore Storm · 22 PAwOBA .345 → .298 (−47)K% 4.5% → 6.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	4.55%	÷0.993	×1.340	—	—	6.13%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.55%	÷0.979	×0.710	—	×0.998	3.29%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷0.973	×0.910	—	×0.998	23.33%
Doubles /BIP	10.00%	÷1.036	×0.820	—	×0.998	7.90%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.993	×0.760	—	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.930	×0.920	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 95, 2B 107, 3B 99, K 99, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .345 → .298; ISO .095 → .075; BABIP .350 → .312. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).