Carlos Ramirez

PosC

B/TR/R

Born1988-03-19

Age (2027)39

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2017

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	25	AASEA	180	.206/.301/.400	6	1	55	—	.174/.244/.329
2016	28	AAAPericos de Pu…	29	.269/.321/.423	1	2	64	—	.231/.286/.385
2017	29	AAAAcereros del …	29	.148/.207/.148	0	0	-22	—	.107/.138/.107

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	21	ROK	Orem Owlz	—	190	149	56	18	0	7	35	26	4	0	0	376	505	638	1.143	262	415	14	18	490	122	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	303	257	58	9	2	9	35	72	9	3	2	226	339	381	720	156	275	24	12	327	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+	Inland Empire 66ers	—	202	181	63	21	0	4	16	33	2	1	0	348	405	530	935	182	404	16	8	407	114	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	129	108	28	3	0	3	15	17	4	1	2	259	370	370	740	111	281	13	12	337	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA	Arkansas Travelers	—	323	275	56	12	1	2	33	55	11	4	0	204	313	276	590	73	245	17	10	277	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	INTL	Scottsdale Scorpions	—	29	24	6	0	0	0	3	3	2	0	0	250	379	250	629		286	10	10	310	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA	Arkansas Travelers	—	180	155	32	12	0	6	16	33	5	1	0	206	301	400	701	194	224	18	9	308	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	29	26	7	1	0	1	1	4	1	2	0	269	321	423	745	154	273	14	3	321	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA	Acereros del Norte	—	29	27	4	0	0	0	2	8	0	0	0	148	207	148	355		211	28	7	173	-22	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	21	ROK MLE	Orem Owlz	—	190	163	43	13	0	5	21	37	4	0	0	264	362	436	797	172	304	19	11	349	122	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	303	271	47	7	1	7	21	103	9	3	2	173	256	284	540	111	242	34	7	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ MLE	Inland Empire 66ers	—	202	186	55	17	0	4	12	46	2	1	0	296	345	452	797	156	357	23	6	337	114	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	129	113	24	2	0	2	10	24	4	1	2	212	299	283	582	71	246	19	8	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	323	287	50	10	1	2	21	67	11	4	0	174	257	237	494	63	212	21	7	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	180	161	28	10	0	5	10	41	5	1	0	174	244	329	574	155	195	23	6	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	29	26	6	1	0	1	1	5	1	2	0	231	286	385	670	154	232	17	3	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	29	28	3	0	0	0	1	10	0	0	0	107	138	107	245		188	34	3	135	-22	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	ROK MLE	Orem Owlz	—	190	163	43	13	0	5	21	37	4	0	0	264	362	436	797	172	309	19	11	349	122	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	ROK RAW	Orem Owlz	—	190	149	56	18	0	7	35	26	4	0	0	376	505	638	1.143	262	415	14	18	490	122	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	303	271	47	7	1	7	21	103	9	3	2	173	256	284	540	111	245	34	7	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A RAW	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	303	257	58	9	2	9	35	72	9	3	2	226	339	381	720	156	275	24	12	327	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	331	300	79	19	0	6	21	70	6	2	2	263	324	387	711	123	322	21	6	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	331	289	91	24	0	7	31	50	6	2	2	315	391	471	862	156	357	15	9	380	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	352	312	55	11	1	2	23	73	13	4	0	176	261	237	499	61	222	21	7	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	352	299	62	12	1	2	36	58	13	4	0	207	319	274	593	67	249	16	10	280	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	180	161	28	10	0	5	10	41	5	1	0	174	244	329	574	155	200	23	6	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA RAW	Arkansas Travelers	—	180	155	32	12	0	6	16	33	5	1	0	206	301	400	701	194	224	18	9	308	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	29	26	6	1	0	1	1	5	1	2	0	231	286	385	670	154	238	17	3	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA RAW	Pericos de Puebla	—	29	26	7	1	0	1	1	4	1	2	0	269	321	423	745	154	273	14	3	321	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	29	28	3	0	0	0	1	10	0	0	0	107	138	107	245		167	34	3	135	-22	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA RAW	Acereros del Norte	—	29	27	4	0	0	0	2	8	0	0	0	148	207	148	355		211	28	7	173	-22	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	ROK MLE	Orem Owlz	—	190	163	43	13	0	5	21	37	4	0	0	264	362	436	797	172	304	19	11	349	122	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	303	270	47	7	1	7	21	103	9	3	2	174	256	285	541	111	242	34	7	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	331	301	79	19	0	6	21	70	6	2	2	262	324	385	710	123	314	21	6	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	352	313	55	11	1	2	23	73	13	4	0	176	261	236	498	61	212	21	7	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Arkansas Travelers	—	180	163	28	10	0	5	10	41	5	1	0	172	244	325	569	153	195	23	6	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	29	27	6	1	0	1	1	5	1	2	0	222	286	370	656	148	232	17	3	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	29	28	3	0	0	0	1	10	0	0	0	107	138	107	245		188	34	3	135	-22	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1414	1261	261	61	2	26	98	339	38	12	4	207	284	320	605	113	259	24	7	267	67	-56	+1	+0	+25	+31	0.1
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	580	120	28	1	12	45	156	17	6	2	207	283	321	604	114	259	24	7	267	67	-26	+0	+0	+12	+14	0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAAAcereros del Norte · 29 PAwOBA .169 → .135 (−34)K% 27.6% → 33.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.59%	÷0.996	×1.200	—	—	33.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.90%	÷0.985	×0.690	—	×0.982	4.74%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.05%	÷1.025	×0.930	—	×0.982	18.75%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.958	×0.830	—	×0.982	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.109	×0.920	—	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.969	×0.700	—	×0.982	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 105, 2B 92, 3B 122, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .169 → .135; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .211 → .188. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAPericos de Puebla · 29 PAwOBA .324 → .263 (−61)K% 13.8% → 18.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.79%	÷0.921	×1.200	—	—	17.98%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.45%	÷1.091	×0.690	—	×0.992	2.16%
HBP% /PA	3.45%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	3.22%
Singles /BIP	22.73%	÷1.048	×0.930	—	×0.992	20.01%
Doubles /BIP	4.55%	÷1.075	×0.830	—	×0.992	3.48%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.008	×0.920	—	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.55%	÷1.024	×0.700	—	×0.992	3.08%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 110, 2B 115, 3B 102, K 84, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .324 → .263; ISO .154 → .109; BABIP .273 → .232. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAArkansas Travelers · 180 PAwOBA .300 → .250 (−50)K% 18.3% → 22.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.33%	÷0.990	×1.220	—	—	22.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.89%	÷1.063	×0.700	—	×0.998	5.84%
HBP% /PA	2.78%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	2.41%
Singles /BIP	11.48%	÷0.981	×0.920	×0.978	×0.998	10.51%
Doubles /BIP	9.84%	÷0.982	×0.840	×0.978	×0.998	8.21%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.943	×0.940	×0.978	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.92%	÷0.951	×0.800	—	×0.998	4.13%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 96, 2B 96, 3B 89, K 98, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .300 → .250; ISO .194 → .165; BABIP .224 → .195. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAArkansas Travelers · 323 PAwOBA .271 → .224 (−46)K% 17.0% → 20.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.03%	÷1.003	×1.220	—	—	20.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.91%	÷1.076	×0.700	—	×1.012	6.52%
HBP% /PA	3.41%	—	×0.870	—	×1.012	3.00%
Singles /BIP	18.64%	÷1.012	×0.920	×0.968	×1.012	16.58%
Doubles /BIP	5.45%	÷1.046	×0.840	×0.968	×1.012	4.29%
Triples /BIP	0.45%	÷1.150	×0.940	×0.968	×1.012	0.36%
Home runs /BIP	0.91%	÷0.819	×0.800	—	×1.012	0.90%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 102, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 101, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.968.

Result: wOBA .271 → .224; ISO .073 → .063; BABIP .245 → .212. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 A+Inland Empire 66ers · 202 PAwOBA .399 → .337 (−62)K% 16.3% → 22.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.34%	÷0.962	×1.340	—	—	22.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.43%	÷0.924	×0.710	—	×0.998	5.69%
HBP% /PA	0.99%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	0.78%
Singles /BIP	25.68%	÷0.991	×0.910	×1.006	×0.998	23.67%
Doubles /BIP	14.19%	÷1.007	×0.820	×1.006	×0.998	11.61%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.129	×0.760	×1.006	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.70%	÷0.932	×0.920	—	×0.998	2.66%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 98, 2B 101, 3B 126, K 92, BB 85 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.

Result: wOBA .399 → .337; ISO .182 → .155; BABIP .404 → .357. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 129 PAwOBA .328 → .266 (−62)K% 13.2% → 18.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.18%	÷0.964	×1.360	—	—	18.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.85%	÷0.996	×0.690	—	×0.990	7.44%
HBP% /PA	3.10%	—	×0.780	—	×0.990	2.39%
Singles /BIP	24.18%	÷1.020	×0.920	×1.003	×0.990	21.64%
Doubles /BIP	3.30%	÷1.028	×0.830	×1.003	×0.990	2.64%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.117	×0.910	×1.003	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.30%	÷1.106	×0.800	—	×0.990	2.36%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 121, 1B 104, 2B 106, 3B 123, K 93, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.003.

Result: wOBA .328 → .266; ISO .111 → .083; BABIP .281 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 303 PAwOBA .318 → .243 (−75)K% 23.8% → 34.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.76%	÷0.952	×1.360	—	—	33.96%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.89%	÷1.093	×0.690	—	—	6.87%
HBP% /PA	2.97%	—	×0.780	—	—	2.32%
Singles /BIP	20.54%	÷0.994	×0.920	×0.984	—	18.70%
Doubles /BIP	4.86%	÷0.994	×0.830	×0.984	—	4.00%
Triples /BIP	1.08%	÷1.150	×0.910	×0.984	—	0.84%
Home runs /BIP	4.86%	÷0.964	×0.800	—	—	4.04%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 99, 2B 99, 3B 130, K 90, BB 119 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.984.

Result: wOBA .318 → .243; ISO .156 → .119; BABIP .275 → .242. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 ROKOrem Owlz · 190 PAwOBA .483 → .349 (−134)K% 13.7% → 19.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.68%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	19.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	18.42%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×0.985	11.07%
HBP% /PA	2.11%	—	×0.720	—	×0.985	1.49%
Singles /BIP	25.20%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.962	×0.985	19.58%
Doubles /BIP	14.63%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.962	×0.985	9.98%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.962	×0.985	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.69%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.985	4.20%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.962.

Result: wOBA .483 → .349; ISO .262 → .195; BABIP .415 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .