Ryan Pressly
P Chicago Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 34 | MLBHOU | 65 | 0 | 65 | 3.58 | 3.16 | 27.6% | 6.0% | 1.1 | |
| 2024 | 35 | MLBHOU | 59 | 0 | 57 | 3.49 | 2.92 | 23.8% | 7.4% | 1.1 | |
| 2025 | 36 | MLBCHC | 44 | 0 | 41 | 4.35 | 4.87 | 15.4% | 9.3% | -0.2 | |
| 2026 | 37 | No MLB games played | |||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 38 | MLBCHC | 50 | 0 | 53 | 4.42 | 4.63 | 18.8% | 8.6% | -0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ | 39 | MLBCHC | 18 | 0 | 19 | 4.80 | 5.06 | 17.6% | 9.3% | -0.1 | |
| 2029PROJ | 40 | MLBCHC | 7 | 0 | 7 | 5.21 | 5.49 | 16.5% | 10.0% | -0.1 | |
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 24 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 49 | 0 | 77 | 315 | 49 | 26 | 5 | 0% | 1.6 | 15.6% | 8.3% | 7.3% | 1.6% | 3.87 | 3.70 | +0.8 |
| 2013 | 24 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 49 | 0 | 77 | 315 | 49 | 26 | 5 | 0% | 1.6 | 15.6% | 8.3% | 7.3% | 1.6% | 3.87 | 3.69 | +0.8 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 25 | 0 | 28 | 122 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 11.5% | 4.9% | 6.6% | 2.4% | 2.86 | 4.10 | +0.2 |
| 2014 | 25 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 25 | 0 | 28 | 122 | 14 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 11.5% | 4.9% | 6.6% | 2.5% | 2.86 | 4.12 | +0.1 |
| 2015 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 38 | 160 | 37 | 17 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.5% | 9.2% | 9.2% | 0.0% | 3.35 | 2.71 | +0.8 |
| 2015 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 34 | 0 | 38 | 160 | 37 | 17 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 23.1% | 10.6% | 12.5% | 0.6% | 3.35 | 2.83 | +0.8 |
| 2016 | 27 | MLB MLE | Minnesota Twins | 72 | 0 | 75 | 328 | 67 | 21 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.4% | 6.4% | 14.0% | 2.4% | 3.70 | 3.52 | +0.9 |
| 2016 | 27 | MLB RAW | Minnesota Twins | 72 | 0 | 75 | 328 | 67 | 21 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.4% | 6.4% | 14.0% | 2.4% | 3.70 | 3.54 | +0.9 |
| 2017 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 64 | 0 | 71 | 292 | 76 | 19 | 10 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.2% | 5.6% | 18.7% | 3.9% | 4.16 | 3.93 | +0.5 |
| 2017 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 64 | 0 | 71 | 292 | 76 | 19 | 10 | 0% | 1.1 | 26.0% | 6.5% | 19.5% | 3.4% | 4.16 | 3.59 | +0.8 |
| 2018 | 29 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 77 | 0 | 71 | 292 | 101 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 34.6% | 7.2% | 27.4% | 2.1% | 2.54 | 2.25 | +2.0 |
| 2018 | 29 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 77 | 0 | 71 | 292 | 101 | 21 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 34.6% | 7.2% | 27.4% | 2.1% | 2.54 | 2.24 | +2.0 |
| 2019 | 30 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 56 | 1 | 55 | 214 | 74 | 12 | 6 | 2% | 1.0 | 34.1% | 5.7% | 28.4% | 2.9% | 2.28 | 2.54 | +1.3 |
| 2019 | 30 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 56 | 1 | 55 | 214 | 74 | 12 | 6 | 2% | 1.0 | 34.6% | 5.6% | 29.0% | 2.8% | 2.28 | 2.49 | +1.4 |
| 2020 | 31 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 23 | 0 | 21 | 91 | 29 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 0.9 | 31.9% | 6.6% | 25.3% | 2.3% | 3.43 | 2.48 | +0.5 |
| 2020 | 31 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 23 | 0 | 21 | 91 | 29 | 6 | 2 | 0% | 0.9 | 31.9% | 6.6% | 25.3% | 2.2% | 3.43 | 2.43 | +0.5 |
| 2021 | 32 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 64 | 0 | 64 | 250 | 81 | 12 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 32.4% | 4.8% | 27.6% | 1.6% | 2.25 | 1.88 | +2.1 |
| 2021 | 32 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 64 | 0 | 64 | 250 | 81 | 12 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 32.4% | 4.8% | 27.6% | 1.6% | 2.25 | 1.94 | +2.0 |
| 2022 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 51 | 0 | 49 | 185 | 65 | 13 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 35.7% | 7.1% | 28.6% | 2.3% | 2.92 | 2.23 | +1.4 |
| 2022 | 33 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 51 | 0 | 49 | 185 | 65 | 13 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 35.1% | 7.0% | 28.1% | 2.2% | 2.92 | 2.31 | +1.3 |
| 2023 | 34 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 65 | 0 | 65 | 268 | 74 | 16 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.6% | 6.0% | 21.6% | 3.1% | 3.58 | 3.21 | +1.0 |
| 2023 | 34 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 65 | 0 | 65 | 268 | 74 | 16 | 8 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.6% | 6.0% | 21.6% | 3.0% | 3.58 | 3.16 | +1.1 |
| 2024 | 35 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 59 | 0 | 57 | 244 | 58 | 18 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.8% | 7.4% | 16.4% | 1.7% | 3.49 | 2.95 | +1.1 |
| 2024 | 35 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 59 | 0 | 57 | 244 | 58 | 18 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.8% | 7.4% | 16.4% | 1.7% | 3.49 | 2.95 | +1.1 |
| 2024 | 35 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 59 | 0 | 57 | 244 | 58 | 18 | 4 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.8% | 7.4% | 16.4% | 1.6% | 3.49 | 2.92 | +1.1 |
| 2025 | 36 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 44 | 0 | 41 | 182 | 28 | 17 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 15.4% | 9.3% | 6.0% | 3.4% | 4.35 | 4.86 | -0.2 |
| 2025 | 36 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 44 | 0 | 41 | 182 | 28 | 17 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 15.4% | 9.3% | 6.0% | 3.4% | 4.35 | 4.86 | -0.2 |
| 2025 | 36 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 44 | 0 | 41 | 182 | 28 | 17 | 6 | 0% | 0.9 | 15.4% | 9.3% | 6.0% | 3.3% | 4.35 | 4.87 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 667 | 0 | 691 | 2856 | 721 | 193 | 66 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.2% | 6.8% | 18.5% | 2.3% | 3.33 | 3.09 | +12.0 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 38 | MLB | CHC | 50 | 0 | 53 | 224 | 42 | 19 | 7 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.8% | 8.6% | 10.2% | 3.0% | 4.42 | 4.63 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 39 | MLB MLE | CHC | 18 | 0 | 19 | 81 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.6% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 3.4% | 4.80 | 5.06 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 40 | MLB MLE | CHC | 6 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.1 | 16.5% | 10.0% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 5.21 | 5.49 | -0.1 |
| 2028 | 39 | MLB CTX | CHC | 18 | 0 | 19 | 80 | 14 | 7 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 17.6% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 3.4% | 4.80 | 5.06 | -0.1 |
| 2029 | 40 | MLB CTX | CHC | 7 | 0 | 7 | 30 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.5% | 10.0% | 6.5% | 3.9% | 5.21 | 5.49 | -0.1 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 692 | 0 | 717 | 2965 | 740 | 203 | 70 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.0% | 6.9% | 18.1% | 2.4% | 3.39 | 3.15 | +11.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 193 | 0 | 200 | 827 | 206 | 57 | 20 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.0% | 6.9% | 18.1% | 2.4% | 3.39 | 3.15 | +3.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 683 | 1 | 713 | 2943 | 740 | 199 | 69 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.2% | 6.8% | 18.4% | 2.3% | 3.31 | 3.12 | +11.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 191 | 0 | 200 | 825 | 208 | 56 | 19 | 0% | 1.0 | 25.2% | 6.8% | 18.4% | 2.3% | 3.31 | 3.12 | +3.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 AAARochester Red Wings · 10 IPFIP 1.52 → 1.98 (+0.46)K% 37.5% → 33.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 37.50% | — | ×0.880 | 33.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.50% | — | ×1.050 | 13.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.956 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 1.52 → 1.98, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAARochester Red Wings · 10 IPFIP 3.20 → 3.87 (+0.66)K% 36.6% → 32.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.59% | — | ×0.880 | 32.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.63% | — | ×1.050 | 15.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.44% | ÷0.956 | ×1.100 | 2.81% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 3.20 → 3.87, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Career Comps
Completed MLB careers (no pro action in 2+ yrs) whose totals — actual + projected — most resemble this player's. Pool: 1,234 reliever careers (754 from 1990-2025 + 480 historical, 1901-2023), also matched on career-to-date at the same age. * Historical (Lahman) careers: rates era-adjusted to 2001-24 league levels; WAR is an OGILVIE proxy.
| Player | 162s | IP/yr | K% | BB% | HR/9 | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OGILVIE CAREER PROJECTION | 3.9 | 48 | 24.5% | 7.4% | 0.93 | 3.46 |
| Joakim Soria ('21) | 3.8 | 54 | 26.4% | 7.3% | 0.79 | 3.11 |
| Joe Smith ('22) | 3.8 | 51 | 21.1% | 8.1% | 0.78 | 3.14 |
| Huston Street ('17) | 3.4 | 57 | 24.5% | 6.7% | 0.93 | 2.95 |
| Paul Assenmacher ('86-'99, 12 WAR*) | 4.3 | 61 | 27.8%* | 8.3%* | 0.98* | 3.61* |
| Jay Howell ('80-'94, 14 WAR*) | 4.2 | 60 | 25.4%* | 8.2%* | 0.80* | 3.74* |
| Larry Andersen ('75-'94, 14 WAR*) | 5.0 | 71 | 24.2%* | 7.4%* | 0.75* | 3.53* |