Chris Jacobs

Pos1B

B/TR/R

Born1988-11-25

Age (2027)38

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	25	A+LAA	548	.266/.390/.499	25	1	101	—	.218/.315/.420
2015	26	AAA/AA/A+CWS	346	.271/.358/.386	5	2	58	—	.221/.282/.300
2016	27	AASTL	121	.212/.258/.336	4	0	26	—	.183/.217/.278

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2007	18	ROK	GCL Dodgers	—	107	96	24	5	0	2	11	36	0	0	0	250	327	365	692	115	379	34	10	314	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	19	ROK	GCL Dodgers	—	171	144	39	5	2	3	24	35	2	1	2	271	382	396	778	125	336	20	14	353	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	ROK	Ogden Raptors	—	171	148	41	10	1	4	21	49	1	0	0	277	371	439	810	162	389	29	12	361	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A	Great Lakes Loons	—	160	149	32	8	0	7	10	50	0	0	0	215	264	409	674	195	269	31	6	295	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A	Great Lakes Loons	—	253	215	62	14	0	12	34	62	3	0	0	288	391	521	912	233	355	25	13	401	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	337	300	82	15	0	17	31	103	6	2	1	273	353	493	846	220	361	31	9	374	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	96	85	16	3	0	3	10	33	0	0	0	188	274	329	603	141	260	34	10	272	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	294	248	71	13	1	14	34	96	7	3	0	286	388	516	904	230	399	33	12	392	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	INTL	Adelaide Bite	—	166	144	35	5	0	5	15	44	5	3	0	243	335	382	717	139	309	27	9	323	105	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	548	451	120	28	1	25	75	117	17	1	2	266	390	499	889	233	303	21	14	391	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA	Charlotte Knights	—	56	49	11	1	0	2	5	13	2	0	0	224	321	367	689	143	265	23	9	315	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA	Birmingham Barons	—	56	49	13	3	1	0	6	17	1	1	0	265	357	367	724	102	406	30	11	331	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	A+	Winston-Salem Dash	—	234	205	58	12	1	3	24	47	3	1	0	283	366	395	762	112	355	20	10	343	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AA	Springfield Cardinals	—	121	113	24	2	0	4	6	39	1	0	1	212	258	336	595	124	282	32	5	265	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2007	18	ROK MLE	GCL Dodgers	—	107	100	15	3	0	1	7	52	0	0	0	150	206	210	416	60	307	49	7	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	19	ROK MLE	GCL Dodgers	—	171	153	31	4	1	2	15	50	2	1	2	203	282	281	563	78	280	29	9	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	171	156	30	7	1	3	13	71	1	0	0	192	259	308	567	115	315	42	8	238	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	160	152	25	6	0	5	7	64	0	0	0	164	201	303	504	138	243	40	4	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	253	228	52	12	0	10	22	88	3	0	0	228	304	412	717	184	320	35	9	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	337	311	65	12	0	12	20	140	6	2	1	209	270	363	633	154	330	42	6	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	96	89	14	3	0	2	6	40	0	0	0	157	211	258	469	101	233	42	6	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	294	258	57	9	1	12	24	126	7	3	0	221	304	403	708	182	346	43	8	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	548	476	104	22	1	24	50	151	17	1	2	218	315	420	735	202	255	28	9	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	56	51	9	1	0	1	3	16	2	0	0	176	250	255	505	78	245	29	5	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	AA MLE	Birmingham Barons	—	56	51	12	3	1	0	4	21	1	1	0	235	304	333	637	98	371	38	7	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	A+ MLE	Winston-Salem Dash	—	234	215	49	8	1	2	14	72	3	1	0	228	284	302	587	74	319	31	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AA MLE	Springfield Cardinals	—	121	115	21	2	0	3	4	47	1	0	1	183	217	278	495	96	265	39	3	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	18	ROK MLE	GCL Dodgers	—	107	100	15	3	0	1	7	52	0	0	0	150	206	210	416	60	298	49	7	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	18	ROK RAW	GCL Dodgers	—	107	96	24	5	0	2	11	36	0	0	0	250	327	365	692	115	379	34	10	314	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	19	ROK MLE	GCL Dodgers	—	171	153	31	4	1	2	15	50	2	1	2	203	282	281	563	78	284	29	9	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	19	ROK RAW	GCL Dodgers	—	171	144	39	5	2	3	24	35	2	1	2	271	382	396	778	125	336	20	14	353	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	171	156	30	7	1	3	13	71	1	0	0	192	259	308	567	115	329	42	8	238	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	ROK RAW	Ogden Raptors	—	171	148	41	10	1	4	21	49	1	0	0	277	371	439	810	162	389	29	12	361	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	160	152	25	6	0	5	7	64	0	0	0	164	201	303	504	138	238	40	4	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A RAW	Great Lakes Loons	—	160	149	32	8	0	7	10	50	0	0	0	215	264	409	674	195	269	31	6	295	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	253	228	52	12	0	10	22	88	3	0	0	228	304	412	717	184	323	35	9	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A RAW	Great Lakes Loons	—	253	215	62	14	0	12	34	62	3	0	0	288	391	521	912	233	355	25	13	401	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	337	311	65	12	0	12	20	140	6	2	1	209	270	363	633	154	333	42	6	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ RAW	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	337	300	82	15	0	17	31	103	6	2	1	273	353	493	846	220	361	31	9	374	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	556	493	101	17	1	20	43	237	12	6	0	205	285	365	650	160	332	43	8	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	556	477	122	21	1	22	59	173	12	6	0	256	352	442	795	187	345	31	11	351	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	548	476	104	22	1	24	50	151	17	1	2	218	315	420	735	202	261	28	9	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ RAW	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	548	451	120	28	1	25	75	117	17	1	2	266	390	499	889	233	303	21	14	391	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	346	317	68	11	1	3	21	109	6	2	0	215	276	284	560	69	317	32	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	346	303	82	16	2	5	35	77	6	2	0	271	358	386	744	116	348	22	10	336	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AA MLE	Springfield Cardinals	—	121	115	21	2	0	3	4	47	1	0	1	183	217	278	495	96	273	39	3	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AA RAW	Springfield Cardinals	—	121	113	24	2	0	4	6	39	1	0	1	212	258	336	595	124	282	32	5	265	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	18	ROK MLE	GCL Dodgers	—	107	99	15	3	0	1	7	52	0	0	0	152	206	212	418	61	307	49	7	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	19	ROK MLE	GCL Dodgers	—	171	152	31	4	1	2	15	50	2	1	2	204	282	283	565	79	280	29	9	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	20	ROK MLE	Ogden Raptors	—	171	155	30	7	1	3	13	71	1	0	0	194	259	310	569	116	315	42	8	238	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	21	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	160	152	25	6	0	5	7	64	0	0	0	164	201	303	504	138	243	40	4	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	22	A MLE	Great Lakes Loons	—	253	226	52	12	0	10	22	88	3	0	0	230	304	416	720	186	320	35	9	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	23	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	337	308	65	12	0	12	20	140	6	2	1	211	270	367	637	156	330	42	6	276	73	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	24	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	556	496	101	17	1	20	43	237	12	6	0	204	285	363	648	159	318	43	8	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	25	A+ MLE	Rancho Cucamonga Quakes	—	548	476	104	22	1	24	50	151	17	1	2	218	315	420	735	202	255	28	9	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	26	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	346	316	68	11	1	3	21	109	6	2	0	215	276	285	561	70	315	32	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	27	AA MLE	Springfield Cardinals	—	121	115	21	2	0	3	4	47	1	0	1	183	217	278	495	96	265	39	3	207	26	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2770	2501	512	96	5	83	202	1009	48	12	6	205	277	347	624	142	301	36	7	272	70	-98	+0	+0	-49	+60	-8.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	587	120	23	1	19	47	237	11	3	1	204	276	344	620	140	301	36	7	272	70	-23	+0	+0	-12	+14	-2.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 AASpringfield Cardinals · 121 PAwOBA .260 → .207 (−53)K% 32.2% → 38.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	32.23%	÷1.019	×1.220	—	—	38.57%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.96%	÷0.999	×0.700	—	×0.968	3.36%
HBP% /PA	0.83%	—	×0.870	—	×0.968	0.70%
Singles /BIP	24.32%	÷0.966	×0.920	×1.049	×0.968	23.54%
Doubles /BIP	2.70%	÷0.986	×0.840	×1.049	×0.968	2.34%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.049	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.41%	÷1.155	×0.800	—	×0.968	3.62%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 131, 1B 93, 2B 97, 3B 80, K 104, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.049.

Result: wOBA .260 → .207; ISO .124 → .081; BABIP .282 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 234 PAwOBA .334 → .254 (−81)K% 20.1% → 30.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.09%	÷0.932	×1.420	—	—	30.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.26%	÷1.060	×0.630	—	×0.958	5.84%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.860	—	×0.958	1.06%
Singles /BIP	26.58%	÷0.963	×0.940	×1.033	×0.958	25.68%
Doubles /BIP	7.59%	÷1.175	×0.830	×1.033	×0.958	5.31%
Triples /BIP	0.63%	÷1.150	×0.800	×1.033	×0.958	0.44%
Home runs /BIP	1.90%	÷1.090	×0.900	—	×0.958	1.50%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 93, 2B 135, 3B 130, K 86, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 22.8 → −4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.033.

Result: wOBA .334 → .254; ISO .112 → .076; BABIP .355 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAACharlotte Knights · 56 PAwOBA .307 → .245 (−62)K% 23.2% → 28.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.21%	÷0.971	×1.200	—	—	28.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.93%	÷1.017	×0.690	—	×1.003	6.08%
HBP% /PA	3.57%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	3.37%
Singles /BIP	22.22%	÷0.973	×0.930	—	×1.003	21.31%
Doubles /BIP	2.78%	÷0.993	×0.830	—	×1.003	2.33%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	—	×1.003	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.56%	÷1.306	×0.840	—	×1.003	3.58%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 161, 1B 95, 2B 99, 3B 130, K 94, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .307 → .245; ISO .143 → .092; BABIP .265 → .245. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AABirmingham Barons · 56 PAwOBA .323 → .263 (−60)K% 30.4% → 37.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	30.36%	÷0.981	×1.220	—	—	37.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.71%	÷1.019	×0.680	—	×0.978	6.99%
HBP% /PA	1.79%	—	×0.840	—	×0.978	1.47%
Singles /BIP	28.12%	÷1.007	×0.920	—	×0.978	25.13%
Doubles /BIP	9.38%	÷0.875	×0.910	—	×0.978	9.53%
Triples /BIP	3.12%	÷1.087	×0.880	—	×0.978	2.48%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.102	×0.800	—	×0.978	0.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 120, 1B 101, 2B 75, 3B 117, K 96, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .323 → .263; ISO .102 → .089; BABIP .406 → .371. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 548 PAwOBA .383 → .317 (−66)K% 21.4% → 27.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.35%	÷1.036	×1.340	—	—	27.62%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.14%	÷0.979	×0.710	—	×0.968	9.22%
HBP% /PA	3.10%	—	×0.790	—	×0.968	2.37%
Singles /BIP	19.76%	÷1.034	×0.910	×1.014	×0.968	17.06%
Doubles /BIP	8.38%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.014	×0.968	6.75%
Triples /BIP	0.30%	÷0.998	×0.760	×1.014	×0.968	0.22%
Home runs /BIP	7.49%	÷0.934	×0.920	—	×0.968	7.14%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 107, 2B 100, 3B 100, K 107, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.

Result: wOBA .383 → .317; ISO .233 → .211; BABIP .303 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 294 PAwOBA .388 → .304 (−84)K% 32.7% → 43.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	32.65%	÷1.018	×1.340	—	—	42.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.56%	÷0.971	×0.710	—	×0.978	8.27%
HBP% /PA	2.38%	—	×0.790	—	×0.978	1.84%
Singles /BIP	28.29%	÷0.993	×0.910	×1.014	×0.978	25.70%
Doubles /BIP	8.55%	÷1.038	×0.820	×1.014	×0.978	6.70%
Triples /BIP	0.66%	÷1.027	×0.760	×1.014	×0.978	0.48%
Home runs /BIP	9.21%	÷0.980	×0.920	—	×0.978	8.45%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 99, 2B 108, 3B 105, K 104, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.

Result: wOBA .388 → .304; ISO .230 → .184; BABIP .399 → .346. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 96 PAwOBA .268 → .207 (−61)K% 34.4% → 41.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	34.38%	÷1.006	×1.220	—	—	41.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.42%	÷1.118	×0.680	—	×0.998	6.32%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	19.23%	÷1.053	×0.920	×1.050	×0.998	17.61%
Doubles /BIP	5.77%	÷1.080	×0.910	×1.050	×0.998	5.09%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.135	×0.880	×1.050	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.77%	÷1.001	×0.800	—	×0.998	4.60%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 111, 2B 116, 3B 127, K 101, BB 124 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .268 → .207; ISO .141 → .111; BABIP .260 → .233. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 337 PAwOBA .362 → .276 (−86)K% 30.6% → 41.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	30.56%	÷0.985	×1.340	—	—	41.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.90%	÷1.038	×0.710	—	×0.988	6.02%
HBP% /PA	1.78%	—	×0.790	—	×0.988	1.39%
Singles /BIP	25.38%	÷1.007	×0.910	×1.047	×0.988	23.71%
Doubles /BIP	7.61%	÷0.941	×0.820	×1.047	×0.988	6.86%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.993	×0.760	×1.047	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	8.63%	÷1.086	×0.920	—	×0.988	7.23%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 101, 2B 88, 3B 99, K 97, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.

Result: wOBA .362 → .276; ISO .220 → .163; BABIP .361 → .330. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .