Josh Collmenter

P Atlanta Braves
Age 41 RHP 6'3" / 240 lbs MLB
Overview
MLBRPLAST SEASON 2017
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
201529MLBARI44121213.794.5412.6%4.4%0.0
201630MIX3 levels2812723.864.5117.2%9.9%0.0K 16.8% · BB 10.0% · FIP 4.71
201731MIX3 levels184435.444.7323.2%5.2%-0.1K 21.3% · BB 5.4% · FIP 5.32
201832No MLB games played
201933No MLB games played
202034No MLB games played
202135No MLB games played
202236No MLB games played
202337No MLB games played
202438No MLB games played
202539No MLB games played
202640No MLB games played
Last 3 seasons WAR -0.0
Contract
No contract data on file.
Skills · percentileStatcast 2017
K%40
FB Velo10
xwOBA vs10
ERA—
FIP—
K%—
BB%—
K-BB%—
Proj IP—
Statcast · Contract
Statcast Percentiles
FB Velo
p1084.1
Whiff%
p3723.5%
K%
p4020.7%
xwOBA vs
p100.375

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
201125MLB MLEArizona Diamondbacks3124154621100261777%5.016.1%4.2%11.9%2.7%3.383.76+3.0
201125MLB RAWArizona Diamondbacks3124154621100261777%5.016.1%4.2%11.9%2.7%3.383.74+3.1
201226MLB MLEArizona Diamondbacks28119037580201339%3.221.3%5.3%16.0%3.4%3.693.86+0.7
201226MLB RAWArizona Diamondbacks28119037580201339%3.221.3%5.3%16.0%3.5%3.693.86+0.7
201327MLB MLEArizona Diamondbacks49092384852580%1.922.1%6.5%15.6%2.1%3.133.19+1.5
201327MLB RAWArizona Diamondbacks49092384852580%1.922.1%6.5%15.6%2.1%3.133.20+1.5
201428MLB MLEArizona Diamondbacks3328179719115371885%5.416.0%5.1%10.8%2.5%3.463.76+3.5
201428MLB RAWArizona Diamondbacks3328179719115371885%5.416.0%5.1%10.8%2.5%3.463.74+3.6
201529MLB MLEArizona Diamondbacks441212149963221827%2.812.6%4.4%8.2%3.6%3.794.55-0.0
201529MLB RAWArizona Diamondbacks441212149963221827%2.812.6%4.4%8.2%3.6%3.794.54+0.0
201630MIX MLE3 levels2812723145431943%2.616.8%10.0%6.8%3.2%3.864.71-0.1
201630MIX RAW3 levels2812723145431943%2.617.2%9.9%7.3%2.9%3.864.51+0.0
201731MIX MLE3 levels1844319445101022%2.421.3%5.4%15.9%6.1%5.445.32-0.4
201731MIX RAW3 levels1844319445101022%2.423.2%5.2%18.0%5.2%5.444.73-0.1
▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded)
MLB Career—2147869528584941498836%3.217.3%5.2%12.1%3.1%3.643.97+4.8
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW2147869528584941498836%3.217.3%5.2%12.1%3.1%3.643.99+4.6
/ 200 IP— RAW6222200822142432536%3.217.3%5.2%12.1%3.1%3.643.99+1.3
Career— MLE2319175231065371729539%3.317.3%5.5%11.8%3.1%3.644.02+4.8
/ 200 IP— MLE6124200826143462539%3.317.3%5.5%11.8%3.1%3.644.02+1.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAAGwinnett Braves · 20 IPFIP 3.70 → 4.25 (+0.55)K% 25.0% → 22.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF25.00%—×0.88022.00%
BB% (unintentional) /BF5.95%—×1.0506.25%
HR / BF /BF3.57%÷0.972×1.1004.04%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).

Result: FIP 3.70 → 4.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ROKGCL Braves · 6 IPFIP 1.45 → 2.29 (+0.84)K% 26.1% → 17.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF26.09%—×0.68017.74%
BB% (unintentional) /BF4.35%—×1.2505.43%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 1.45 → 2.29, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAIowa Cubs · 23 IPFIP 3.89 → 4.24 (+0.35)K% 14.7% → 12.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF14.71%—×0.88012.94%
BB% (unintentional) /BF11.76%—×1.05012.35%
HR / BF /BF0.98%÷0.890×1.1001.21%

Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).

Result: FIP 3.89 → 4.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Visalia Rawhide · 8 IPFIP 4.51 → 5.15 (+0.64)K% 15.4% → 11.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.38%—×0.77011.85%
BB% (unintentional) /BF10.26%—×1.15011.79%
HR / BF /BF2.56%÷1.134×1.2502.83%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 127).

Result: FIP 4.51 → 5.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).