Paul Clemens
P Chattanooga Lookouts| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 27 | MIX3 levels | 17 | 8 | 49 | 5.73 | 4.95 | 16.4% | 12.8% | — | K 14.3% · BB 14.1% · FIP 5.37 | |
| 2016 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 32 | 28 | 147 | 4.17 | 4.40 | 18.9% | 8.9% | 1.7 | K 17.6% · BB 9.1% · FIP 4.58 | |
| 2017 | 29 | AACIN | 17 | 8 | 53 | 2.87 | 4.04 | 18.3% | 10.0% | — | K 14.9% · BB 11.0% · FIP 4.72 | |
| 2018 | 30 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 31 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2020 | 32 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 25 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 35 | 5 | 73 | 323 | 49 | 25 | 16 | 14% | 2.1 | 15.2% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 5.1% | 5.40 | 5.60 | -0.9 |
| 2013 | 25 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 35 | 5 | 73 | 323 | 49 | 25 | 16 | 14% | 2.1 | 15.2% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 5.0% | 5.40 | 5.62 | -0.9 |
| 2014 | 26 | MLB MLE | Houston Astros | 13 | 0 | 25 | 118 | 16 | 12 | 5 | 0% | 1.9 | 13.6% | 10.2% | 3.4% | 4.4% | 5.84 | 5.63 | -0.3 |
| 2014 | 26 | MLB RAW | Houston Astros | 13 | 0 | 25 | 118 | 16 | 12 | 5 | 0% | 1.9 | 13.6% | 10.2% | 3.4% | 4.2% | 5.84 | 5.90 | -0.4 |
| 2015 | 27 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 17 | 8 | 49 | 219 | 36 | 28 | 6 | 47% | 2.9 | 14.3% | 14.1% | 0.2% | 3.1% | 5.73 | 5.37 | — |
| 2015 | 27 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 17 | 8 | 49 | 219 | 36 | 28 | 6 | 47% | 2.9 | 16.4% | 12.8% | 3.7% | 2.7% | 5.73 | 4.95 | — |
| 2016 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 32 | 28 | 147 | 630 | 119 | 56 | 20 | 88% | 4.6 | 17.6% | 9.1% | 8.5% | 3.3% | 4.17 | 4.58 | +1.4 |
| 2016 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 32 | 28 | 147 | 630 | 119 | 56 | 20 | 88% | 4.6 | 18.9% | 8.9% | 10.0% | 3.2% | 4.17 | 4.40 | +1.7 |
| 2017 | 29 | AA MLE | Chattanooga Lookouts | 17 | 8 | 53 | 229 | 42 | 23 | 5 | 47% | 3.1 | 14.9% | 11.0% | 3.8% | 2.7% | 2.87 | 4.72 | — |
| 2017 | 29 | AA RAW | Chattanooga Lookouts | 17 | 8 | 53 | 229 | 42 | 23 | 5 | 47% | 3.1 | 18.3% | 10.0% | 8.3% | 2.2% | 2.87 | 4.04 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 66 | 19 | 169 | 755 | 118 | 68 | 35 | 29% | 2.6 | 15.6% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 4.6% | 4.89 | 5.60 | -2.0 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 66 | 19 | 169 | 755 | 118 | 68 | 35 | 29% | 2.6 | 15.6% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 4.6% | 4.89 | 5.47 | -1.8 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 78 | 22 | 200 | 892 | 139 | 80 | 41 | 29% | 2.6 | 15.6% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 4.6% | 4.89 | 5.47 | -2.1 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 114 | 49 | 347 | 1519 | 241 | 150 | 55 | 43% | 3.0 | 15.9% | 9.9% | 6.0% | 3.6% | 4.57 | 5.01 | -2.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 66 | 28 | 200 | 876 | 139 | 87 | 32 | 43% | 3.0 | 15.9% | 9.9% | 6.0% | 3.6% | 4.57 | 5.01 | -2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 53 IPFIP 4.02 → 4.72 (+0.70)K% 18.3% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.34% | — | ×0.810 | 14.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.04% | — | ×1.100 | 11.05% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.18% | ÷0.975 | ×1.200 | 2.69% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 95).
Result: FIP 4.02 → 4.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAANew Orleans Zephyrs · 75 IPFIP 3.38 → 3.85 (+0.47)K% 20.9% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.89% | — | ×0.880 | 18.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.91% | — | ×1.050 | 8.31% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.90% | ÷0.919 | ×1.100 | 2.27% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 3.38 → 3.85, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAOmaha Storm Chasers · 31 IPFIP 5.04 → 5.24 (+0.20)K% 18.1% → 15.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 18.06% | — | ×0.880 | 15.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.28% | — | ×1.050 | 16.04% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.78% | ÷1.157 | ×1.100 | 2.64% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 131).
Result: FIP 5.04 → 5.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 16 IPFIP 4.74 → 5.65 (+0.92)K% 13.4% → 10.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.43% | — | ×0.810 | 10.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.96% | — | ×1.100 | 9.85% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.99% | ÷0.883 | ×1.200 | 4.05% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 77).
Result: FIP 4.74 → 5.65, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).