Luis Castillo
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 23 | A+/ADET | 413 | .243/.309/.341 | 3 | 2 | 49 | — | .208/.260/.298 |
| 2013 | 24 | AADET | 336 | .242/.331/.334 | 2 | 0 | 71 | — | .234/.298/.319 |
| 2025 | 36 | INTLPanama | 16 | .286/.375/.500 | 1 | 0 | 150 | — |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 18 | ROK | VSL Tigers | — | 278 | 241 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 232 | 317 | 311 | 629 | 79 | 250 | 9 | 10 | 284 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 19 | ROK | DSL Tigers | — | 245 | 212 | 52 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 24 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 245 | 336 | 292 | 629 | 47 | 271 | 10 | 11 | 291 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 20 | ROK | GCL Tigers | — | 196 | 178 | 39 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 25 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 219 | 276 | 270 | 546 | 51 | 248 | 13 | 7 | 248 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 21 | A+ | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 62 | 54 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 167 | 211 | 167 | 377 | 196 | 15 | 5 | 165 | -10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2010 | 21 | ROK | GCL Tigers | — | 68 | 65 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 323 | 343 | 369 | 713 | 46 | 375 | 13 | 3 | 317 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 530 | 468 | 125 | 26 | 2 | 3 | 40 | 69 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 267 | 327 | 350 | 678 | 83 | 303 | 13 | 8 | 297 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A+ | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 356 | 308 | 73 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 62 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 237 | 307 | 305 | 612 | 68 | 290 | 17 | 8 | 269 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 57 | 50 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 280 | 321 | 560 | 881 | 280 | 273 | 11 | 5 | 352 | 102 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 24 | AA | Erie SeaWolves | — | 336 | 293 | 71 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 57 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 242 | 331 | 334 | 666 | 92 | 291 | 17 | 10 | 303 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 36 | INTL | Panama | — | 16 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 286 | 375 | 500 | 875 | 214 | 333 | 25 | 6 | 389 | 150 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2007 | 18 | ROK MLE | VSL Tigers | — | 278 | 249 | 40 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 29 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 161 | 229 | 209 | 438 | 48 | 171 | 10 | 7 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers | — | 245 | 220 | 36 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 29 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 164 | 237 | 186 | 423 | 23 | 183 | 12 | 7 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Tigers | — | 196 | 183 | 31 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 36 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 169 | 208 | 208 | 416 | 38 | 201 | 18 | 4 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 62 | 55 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 164 | 193 | 164 | 357 | 187 | 21 | 3 | 154 | -10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2010 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Tigers | — | 68 | 66 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 242 | 254 | 273 | 526 | 30 | 298 | 19 | 1 | 231 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 530 | 482 | 116 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 97 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 241 | 282 | 315 | 598 | 75 | 275 | 18 | 5 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A+ MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 356 | 315 | 64 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 23 | 88 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 203 | 260 | 267 | 526 | 63 | 257 | 25 | 6 | 227 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 57 | 51 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 235 | 264 | 490 | 754 | 255 | 234 | 14 | 4 | 319 | 102 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 24 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 336 | 304 | 71 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 69 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 234 | 298 | 319 | 617 | 86 | 289 | 21 | 7 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 18 | ROK MLE | VSL Tigers | — | 278 | 249 | 40 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 29 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 161 | 229 | 209 | 438 | 48 | 177 | 10 | 7 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 18 | ROK RAW | VSL Tigers | — | 278 | 241 | 56 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 27 | 24 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 232 | 317 | 311 | 629 | 79 | 250 | 9 | 10 | 284 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers | — | 245 | 220 | 36 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 29 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 164 | 237 | 186 | 423 | 23 | 188 | 12 | 7 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Tigers | — | 245 | 212 | 52 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 24 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 245 | 336 | 292 | 629 | 47 | 271 | 10 | 11 | 291 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Tigers | — | 196 | 183 | 31 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 36 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 169 | 208 | 208 | 416 | 38 | 204 | 18 | 4 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 20 | ROK RAW | GCL Tigers | — | 196 | 178 | 39 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 25 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 219 | 276 | 270 | 546 | 51 | 248 | 13 | 7 | 248 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 21 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 130 | 120 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 208 | 234 | 225 | 459 | 17 | 263 | 20 | 3 | 194 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 21 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 130 | 119 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 18 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 252 | 282 | 277 | 560 | 25 | 294 | 14 | 4 | 244 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 530 | 482 | 116 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 97 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 241 | 282 | 315 | 598 | 75 | 291 | 18 | 5 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | A RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 530 | 468 | 125 | 26 | 2 | 3 | 40 | 69 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 267 | 327 | 350 | 678 | 83 | 303 | 13 | 8 | 297 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 413 | 366 | 78 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 96 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 213 | 265 | 306 | 571 | 93 | 276 | 23 | 6 | 240 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 413 | 358 | 87 | 22 | 2 | 3 | 33 | 68 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 243 | 309 | 341 | 649 | 98 | 288 | 16 | 8 | 280 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 24 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 336 | 304 | 71 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 69 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 234 | 298 | 319 | 617 | 86 | 292 | 21 | 7 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 24 | AA RAW | Erie SeaWolves | — | 336 | 293 | 71 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 35 | 57 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 242 | 331 | 334 | 666 | 92 | 291 | 17 | 10 | 303 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 36 | INTL MLE | Panama | — | 16 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 286 | 375 | 500 | 875 | 214 | 333 | 25 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 36 | INTL RAW | Panama | — | 16 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 286 | 375 | 500 | 875 | 214 | 333 | 25 | 6 | 389 | 150 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 18 | ROK MLE | VSL Tigers | — | 278 | 254 | 40 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 29 | 3 | 8 | 5 | 157 | 229 | 205 | 434 | 47 | 171 | 10 | 7 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Tigers | — | 245 | 222 | 36 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 29 | 3 | 14 | 6 | 162 | 237 | 185 | 421 | 23 | 183 | 12 | 7 | 197 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Tigers | — | 196 | 185 | 31 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 36 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 168 | 208 | 205 | 414 | 38 | 201 | 18 | 4 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 21 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 130 | 125 | 25 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 200 | 234 | 216 | 450 | 16 | 245 | 20 | 3 | 194 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 530 | 497 | 116 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 26 | 97 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 233 | 282 | 306 | 588 | 72 | 275 | 18 | 5 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 413 | 384 | 78 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 25 | 96 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 203 | 265 | 292 | 557 | 89 | 254 | 23 | 6 | 240 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 24 | AA MLE | Erie SeaWolves | — | 336 | 305 | 71 | 16 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 69 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 233 | 298 | 318 | 616 | 85 | 289 | 21 | 7 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 2144 | 1938 | 401 | 76 | 8 | 11 | 125 | 386 | 15 | 39 | 27 | 207 | 260 | 271 | 532 | 64 | 250 | 18 | 6 | 228 | 40 | -152 | -3 | +0 | +8 | +46 | -10.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 588 | 121 | 23 | 2 | 3 | 38 | 117 | 5 | 12 | 8 | 206 | 260 | 267 | 527 | 61 | 249 | 18 | 6 | 228 | 40 | -46 | -1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -3.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2013 AAErie SeaWolves · 336 PAwOBA .298 → .273 (−26)K% 17.0% → 20.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.96% | ÷1.004 | ×1.220 | — | — | 20.62% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.42% | ÷1.034 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.012 | 7.14% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.19% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×1.012 | 1.02% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.19% | ÷0.998 | ×0.970 | ×1.029 | ×1.012 | 21.46% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.20% | ÷0.965 | ×0.860 | ×1.029 | ×1.012 | 6.69% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.85% | ÷0.902 | ×0.950 | ×1.029 | ×1.012 | 0.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.85% | ÷1.020 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.012 | 0.66% |
Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 100, 2B 93, 3B 80, K 101, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.029.
Result: wOBA .298 → .273; ISO .092 → .086; BABIP .291 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 A+Lakeland Flying Tigers · 356 PAwOBA .264 → .227 (−38)K% 17.4% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.42% | ÷1.004 | ×1.420 | — | — | 24.64% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.43% | ÷0.982 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.998 | 6.42% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.28% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.998 | 0.26% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.95% | ÷1.040 | ×0.920 | ×0.973 | ×0.998 | 18.86% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.32% | ÷0.970 | ×0.960 | ×0.973 | ×0.998 | 7.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×0.973 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.41% | ÷1.122 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.998 | 0.32% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 124, 1B 108, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 101, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.
Result: wOBA .264 → .227; ISO .068 → .063; BABIP .290 → .257. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 57 PAwOBA .354 → .319 (−35)K% 10.5% → 14.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.53% | ÷0.978 | ×1.360 | — | — | 14.64% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.26% | ÷1.034 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 3.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.64% | ÷1.020 | ×0.920 | ×0.967 | ×0.990 | 11.77% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.09% | ÷0.990 | ×0.830 | ×0.967 | ×0.990 | 7.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 4.55% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.967 | ×0.990 | 4.40% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.55% | ÷0.865 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 4.16% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 104, 2B 98, 3B 80, K 96, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.967.
Result: wOBA .354 → .319; ISO .280 → .267; BABIP .273 → .234. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2011 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 530 PAwOBA .293 → .253 (−39)K% 13.0% → 18.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.02% | ÷0.970 | ×1.360 | — | — | 18.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.55% | ÷1.062 | ×0.690 | — | — | 4.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.38% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.29% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.56% | ÷1.026 | ×0.920 | ×1.022 | — | 21.60% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.52% | ÷0.972 | ×0.830 | ×1.022 | — | 5.69% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.50% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.022 | — | 0.41% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.75% | ÷0.919 | ×0.800 | — | — | 0.65% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 105, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 94, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.
Result: wOBA .293 → .253; ISO .083 → .073; BABIP .303 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2010 ROKGCL Tigers · 68 PAwOBA .308 → .231 (−77)K% 13.2% → 19.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.24% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 19.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 2.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 1.80% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 32.14% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.003 | ×0.985 | 26.03% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.36% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.003 | ×0.985 | 3.81% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.003 | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.003.
Result: wOBA .308 → .231; ISO .046 → .032; BABIP .375 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2010 A+Lakeland Flying Tigers · 62 PAwOBA .164 → .154 (−10)K% 14.5% → 21.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.52% | ÷0.967 | ×1.420 | — | — | 21.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.84% | ÷0.987 | ×0.750 | — | ×1.027 | 3.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.040 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 19.07% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.063 | ×0.960 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×1.050 | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.772 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.027 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 54, 1B 108, 2B 113, 3B 130, K 93, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .164 → .154; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .196 → .187. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2009 ROKGCL Tigers · 196 PAwOBA .243 → .184 (−58)K% 12.8% → 18.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.76% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 18.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 4.09% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.51% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.37% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.013 | ×0.995 | 17.28% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.013 | ×0.995 | 2.85% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.013 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.65% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.51% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.
Result: wOBA .243 → .184; ISO .051 → .037; BABIP .248 → .201. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2008 DSLDSL Tigers · 245 PAwOBA .285 → .197 (−87)K% 9.8% → 12.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 9.80% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 11.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.61% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 7.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.22% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 0.85% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.015 | ×0.995 | 16.45% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.015 | ×0.995 | 1.61% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.015 | ×0.995 | 0.32% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 0.25% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.
Result: wOBA .285 → .197; ISO .047 → .028; BABIP .271 → .183. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .