Yunesky Sanchez

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1984-05-03

Age (2027)43

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	30	AAA/INTL2 orgs	705	.324/.367/.455	15	10	94	—	.273/.307/.362
2015	31	AAA/INTL2 orgs	441	.311/.375/.415	5	5	96	—	.259/.302/.313
2016	32	AAA/INTL2 orgs	139	.206/.235/.267	1	1	28	—	.184/.205/.211

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2007	23	A	South Bend Silver Hawks	—	445	408	115	16	2	3	25	36	2	6	6	282	326	353	679	71	300	8	6	301	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	24	AA	Mobile BayBears	—	523	494	146	20	3	0	23	41	5	8	13	296	333	348	682	53	322	8	4	309	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	25	AA	Mobile BayBears	—	213	199	53	7	2	2	14	26	0	3	4	266	315	352	666	85	298	12	7	301	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	26	AAA	Reno Aces	—	368	338	96	18	2	7	26	45	0	5	4	284	335	411	746	127	308	12	7	330	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	26	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	24	24	5	0	0	0	0	3	0	0	0	208	208	208	417		238	12	0	189	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	27	AA	Altoona Curve	—	145	134	40	6	0	2	6	18	2	0	1	299	338	388	726	90	325	12	4	321	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	29	AAA	Guerreros de Oaxaca	—	261	243	84	9	1	6	15	27	1	1	2	346	386	465	851	119	368	10	6	377	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	29	INTL	Mexico	—	230	220	58	9	1	7	7	30	1	1	1	264	289	409	699	145	279	13	3	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	30	AAA	Guerreros de Oaxaca	—	428	392	132	22	1	12	28	49	3	8	5	337	385	490	875	153	358	11	7	384	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	30	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	277	259	79	12	2	3	9	31	4	2	1	305	338	402	740	97	330	11	3	326	107	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	31	AAA	Guerreros de Oaxaca	—	300	267	82	11	2	2	23	29	5	5	5	307	373	386	759	79	332	10	8	340	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	31	INTL	Venados de Mazatlan	—	141	128	41	11	0	3	11	13	1	0	0	320	379	477	855	156	339	9	8	377	142	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	32	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	40	38	9	2	0	0	1	6	0	0	0	237	256	289	546	53	273	15	2	240	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	32	INTL	Venados de Mazatlan	—	99	93	18	3	0	1	4	13	0	1	0	194	227	258	485	65	212	13	4	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2007	23	A MLE	South Bend Silver Hawks	—	445	417	109	14	2	2	16	49	2	6	6	261	292	319	611	58	280	11	4	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	24	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	523	502	143	19	3	0	15	50	5	8	13	285	312	335	647	50	314	10	3	284	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	25	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	213	205	51	7	2	2	8	32	0	3	4	249	277	332	609	83	285	15	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	26	AAA MLE	Reno Aces	—	368	347	84	14	1	5	17	62	0	5	4	242	277	331	609	89	275	17	5	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	27	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	145	135	39	5	0	2	5	22	2	0	1	289	324	370	694	81	314	15	3	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	29	AAA MLE	Guerreros de Oaxaca	—	261	249	75	7	1	3	9	34	1	1	2	301	328	373	702	72	332	13	3	311	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	30	AAA MLE	Guerreros de Oaxaca	—	428	403	110	16	1	6	17	62	3	8	5	273	307	362	670	89	303	14	4	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	31	AAA MLE	Guerreros de Oaxaca	—	300	278	72	8	2	1	12	36	5	5	5	259	302	313	615	54	282	12	4	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	32	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	40	38	7	1	0	0	1	7	0	0	0	184	205	211	416	26	226	18	2	193	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	23	A MLE	South Bend Silver Hawks	—	445	417	109	14	2	2	16	49	2	6	6	261	292	319	611	58	289	11	4	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	23	A RAW	South Bend Silver Hawks	—	445	408	115	16	2	3	25	36	2	6	6	282	326	353	679	71	300	8	6	301	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	24	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	523	502	143	19	3	0	15	50	5	8	13	285	312	335	647	50	316	10	3	284	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	24	AA RAW	Mobile BayBears	—	523	494	146	20	3	0	23	41	5	8	13	296	333	348	682	53	322	8	4	309	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	25	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	213	205	51	7	2	2	8	32	0	3	4	249	277	332	609	83	287	15	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	25	AA RAW	Mobile BayBears	—	213	199	53	7	2	2	14	26	0	3	4	266	315	352	666	85	298	12	7	301	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	392	370	90	14	2	6	18	66	0	5	4	243	278	341	619	97	279	17	5	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	392	362	101	18	2	7	26	48	0	5	4	279	327	398	725	119	303	12	7	321	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	27	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	145	135	39	5	0	2	5	22	2	0	1	289	324	370	694	81	325	15	3	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	27	AA RAW	Altoona Curve	—	145	134	40	6	0	2	6	18	2	0	1	299	338	388	726	90	325	12	4	321	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	491	468	142	14	2	6	17	64	2	2	3	303	331	380	711	77	340	13	3	311	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	491	463	142	18	2	13	22	57	2	2	3	307	341	438	779	132	327	12	4	344	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	705	661	183	27	1	11	27	102	7	10	6	277	312	371	683	94	309	14	4	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	30	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	705	651	211	34	3	15	37	80	7	10	6	324	367	455	822	131	347	11	5	361	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	441	412	106	12	3	2	17	53	6	5	5	257	297	316	612	58	287	12	4	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	31	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	441	395	123	22	2	5	34	42	6	5	5	311	375	415	790	104	334	10	8	352	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	32	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	139	133	26	5	0	0	3	26	0	1	0	195	213	233	446	38	239	19	2	193	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	32	INTL RAW	2 teams	—	139	131	27	5	0	1	5	19	0	1	0	206	235	267	502	61	230	14	4	223	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	23	A MLE	South Bend Silver Hawks	—	445	424	109	14	2	2	16	49	2	6	6	257	292	314	606	57	280	11	4	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	24	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	523	498	143	19	3	0	15	50	5	8	13	287	312	337	650	50	314	10	3	284	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	25	AA MLE	Mobile BayBears	—	213	203	51	7	2	2	8	32	0	3	4	251	277	335	612	84	285	15	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	392	371	90	14	2	6	18	66	0	5	4	243	278	340	618	97	275	17	5	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	27	AA MLE	Altoona Curve	—	145	137	39	5	0	2	5	22	2	0	1	285	324	365	689	80	314	15	3	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	491	469	142	14	2	6	17	64	2	2	3	303	331	380	710	77	332	13	3	311	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	705	665	183	27	1	11	27	102	7	10	6	275	312	368	681	93	303	14	4	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	441	415	106	12	3	2	17	53	6	5	5	255	297	313	610	58	282	12	4	277	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	32	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	139	135	26	5	0	0	3	26	0	1	0	193	213	230	443	37	226	19	2	193	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	3494	3303	889	117	15	31	126	464	24	40	42	269	301	342	643	73	303	13	4	280	76	-100	-9	+0	+37	+76	0.5
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	614	166	22	3	6	23	86	4	7	8	270	300	345	645	75	304	13	4	280	76	-19	-2	+0	+7	+14	0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 40 PAwOBA .239 → .193 (−46)K% 15.0% → 18.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.00%	÷0.977	×1.200	—	—	18.42%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.50%	÷0.933	×0.690	—	×0.952	1.76%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.952	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.88%	÷1.022	×0.930	—	×0.952	18.95%
Doubles /BIP	6.25%	÷1.142	×0.830	—	×0.952	4.32%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.920	—	×0.952	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.872	×0.700	—	×0.952	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 104, 2B 128, 3B 100, K 95, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 32 vs a level average of 27.2 → −4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .239 → .193; ISO .053 → .036; BABIP .273 → .226. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAGuerreros de Oaxaca · 300 PAwOBA .330 → .277 (−53)K% 9.7% → 12.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.67%	÷0.966	×1.200	—	—	12.01%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.00%	÷1.029	×0.690	—	×0.962	3.87%
HBP% /PA	1.67%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	1.51%
Singles /BIP	28.15%	÷1.059	×0.930	×1.031	×0.962	24.51%
Doubles /BIP	4.62%	÷1.117	×0.830	×1.031	×0.962	3.41%
Triples /BIP	0.84%	÷1.017	×0.920	×1.031	×0.962	0.75%
Home runs /BIP	0.84%	÷1.244	×0.700	—	×0.962	0.46%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 112, 2B 123, 3B 103, K 93, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.

Result: wOBA .330 → .277; ISO .079 → .058; BABIP .332 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAGuerreros de Oaxaca · 428 PAwOBA .377 → .294 (−83)K% 11.4% → 14.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.45%	÷0.948	×1.200	—	—	14.49%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.54%	÷1.120	×0.690	—	×0.972	3.92%
HBP% /PA	0.70%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	0.64%
Singles /BIP	28.28%	÷1.067	×0.930	×1.050	×0.972	25.16%
Doubles /BIP	6.41%	÷1.167	×0.830	×1.050	×0.972	4.66%
Triples /BIP	0.29%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.050	×0.972	0.24%
Home runs /BIP	3.50%	÷1.287	×0.700	—	×0.972	1.85%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 157, 1B 113, 2B 133, 3B 130, K 90, BB 124 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .377 → .294; ISO .153 → .094; BABIP .358 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAGuerreros de Oaxaca · 261 PAwOBA .367 → .311 (−56)K% 10.3% → 13.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.34%	÷0.952	×1.200	—	—	13.04%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.98%	÷0.992	×0.690	—	×0.982	3.40%
HBP% /PA	0.38%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	0.35%
Singles /BIP	31.48%	÷1.022	×0.930	×1.042	×0.982	29.30%
Doubles /BIP	4.17%	÷1.064	×0.830	×1.042	×0.982	3.33%
Triples /BIP	0.46%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.042	×0.982	0.38%
Home runs /BIP	2.78%	÷1.221	×0.700	—	×0.982	1.56%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 144, 1B 104, 2B 113, 3B 130, K 90, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.042.

Result: wOBA .367 → .311; ISO .119 → .078; BABIP .368 → .332. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAltoona Curve · 145 PAwOBA .318 → .297 (−22)K% 12.4% → 15.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.41%	÷0.977	×1.220	—	—	15.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.14%	÷0.897	×0.700	—	×0.978	3.16%
HBP% /PA	1.38%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	1.15%
Singles /BIP	27.59%	÷0.986	×0.970	×1.021	×0.978	27.10%
Doubles /BIP	5.17%	÷0.949	×0.860	×1.021	×0.978	4.68%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.949	×0.950	×1.021	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.72%	÷0.931	×0.780	—	×0.978	1.41%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 97, 2B 90, 3B 90, K 95, BB 79 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.

Result: wOBA .318 → .297; ISO .090 → .077; BABIP .325 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAReno Aces · 368 PAwOBA .323 → .267 (−56)K% 12.2% → 16.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.23%	÷0.938	×1.290	—	—	16.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.79%	÷1.093	×0.710	—	×1.018	4.49%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.55%	÷0.984	×0.900	×1.007	×1.018	22.07%
Doubles /BIP	6.14%	÷1.087	×0.810	×1.007	×1.018	4.69%
Triples /BIP	0.68%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.007	×1.018	0.49%
Home runs /BIP	2.39%	÷1.061	×0.780	—	×1.018	1.79%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 97, 2B 117, 3B 130, K 88, BB 119 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.

Result: wOBA .323 → .267; ISO .127 → .095; BABIP .308 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 AAMobile BayBears · 213 PAwOBA .290 → .263 (−27)K% 12.2% → 14.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.21%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	14.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.63%	÷1.000	×0.680	—	×0.998	3.82%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	24.28%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.046	×0.998	23.31%
Doubles /BIP	4.05%	÷1.000	×0.910	×1.046	×0.998	3.84%
Triples /BIP	1.16%	÷1.000	×0.880	×1.046	×0.998	1.06%
Home runs /BIP	1.16%	÷1.000	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.92%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.

Result: wOBA .290 → .263; ISO .085 → .076; BABIP .298 → .285. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AAMobile BayBears · 523 PAwOBA .299 → .284 (−16)K% 7.8% → 9.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	7.84%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	9.56%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.02%	÷1.000	×0.680	—	×1.012	2.76%
HBP% /PA	0.96%	—	×0.840	—	×1.012	0.81%
Singles /BIP	27.15%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.050	×1.012	26.54%
Doubles /BIP	4.42%	÷1.000	×0.910	×1.050	×1.012	4.27%
Triples /BIP	0.66%	÷1.000	×0.880	×1.050	×1.012	0.62%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.800	—	×1.012	0.00%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .299 → .284; ISO .053 → .051; BABIP .322 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .