Ozzie Martínez

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1988-05-07

Age (2027)39

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLROOKIE

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR
2023	35	INTLLeones de Pon…	35	.156/.229/.250	1	0	37	—
2024	36	INTLLeones de Pon…	124	.248/.336/.276	0	0	74	—
2025	37	INTLLeones de Pon…	18	.118/.167/.118	0	1	-20	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2006	18	ROK	GCL Marlins	—	194	171	45	4	1	1	19	21	0	7	4	263	337	316	653	53	293	11	10	296	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	A	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	331	304	90	11	3	6	13	46	4	5	5	296	333	411	745	115	331	14	4	323	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	485	433	110	16	5	1	41	51	4	16	4	254	324	321	645	67	285	11	8	293	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	MLB	Florida Marlins	—	48	43	14	4	1	0	4	6	0	1	0	326	383	465	848	140	378	12	8	368	146	+3	+0	+1	+7	+1	1.2
2010	22	AA	Jacksonville Suns	—	587	516	156	28	4	5	49	64	9	13	9	302	373	401	774	99	336	11	8	343	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	INTL	Phoenix Desert Dogs	—	26	25	4	1	0	1	0	4	1	0	1	160	192	320	512	160	150	15	0	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	MLB	Florida Marlins	—	23	23	3	0	0	0	0	9	0	0	0	130	130	130	261		214	39	0	118	-33	-4	+0	-0	+6	+0	0.3
2011	23	AAA	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	371	339	83	15	1	3	21	57	5	11	4	245	299	322	620	77	284	15	6	279	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	165	143	37	2	3	0	20	16	1	4	1	259	354	315	668	56	289	10	12	309	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	340	316	64	13	0	0	16	48	2	4	0	203	246	244	489	41	239	14	5	222	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	133	123	36	7	1	0	6	15	1	0	0	293	331	366	697	73	330	11	5	307	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	50	43	10	4	1	0	7	6	0	1	0	233	340	372	712	140	270	12	14	323	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	277	253	63	11	0	4	19	35	2	5	4	249	307	340	646	91	276	13	7	291	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	INTL	Puerto Rico	—	151	134	38	9	2	2	13	26	1	1	2	284	351	425	777	142	333	17	9	340	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	269	243	70	11	2	0	20	29	0	4	0	288	342	350	692	62	324	11	7	308	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	122	108	19	2	1	2	9	20	1	1	0	176	246	269	514	93	193	16	7	230	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	INTL	Puerto Rico	—	167	146	51	9	3	3	16	23	2	0	1	349	421	514	934	164	397	14	10	406	161	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	477	433	109	14	1	2	36	65	2	9	4	252	312	303	615	51	290	14	8	280	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	INTL	Puerto Rico	—	177	151	22	0	2	0	21	19	1	3	3	146	254	172	427	26	165	11	12	207	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	365	343	81	9	2	4	17	54	0	7	2	236	272	309	581	73	268	15	5	259	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	162	145	36	10	0	1	10	17	3	2	1	248	310	338	648	90	273	10	6	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	154	144	32	2	0	1	7	28	0	3	0	222	258	257	515	35	267	18	5	232	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	51	48	14	4	0	1	3	2	0	0	0	292	333	438	771	146	289	4	6	342	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	125	107	27	4	0	1	17	6	0	6	2	252	355	318	673	65	257	5	14	312	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	INTL	Puerto Rico	—	151	135	33	4	0	4	13	24	1	2	2	244	315	363	678	119	266	16	9	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	32	INTL	Atenienses de Manati	—	56	43	12	0	0	0	8	6	2	0	0	279	415	279	694		308	11	14	320	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	124	109	22	4	0	3	13	17	0	0	1	202	285	321	606	119	211	14	10	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	34	INTL	Gigantes de Carolina	—	113	103	24	1	0	0	7	13	1	2	1	233	288	243	531	10	267	12	6	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	35	INTL	Leones de Ponce	—	35	32	5	0	0	1	3	6	0	0	0	156	229	250	479	94	160	17	9	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	36	INTL	Leones de Ponce	—	124	105	26	3	0	0	13	22	1	0	0	248	336	276	612	29	302	18	10	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	37	INTL	Leones de Ponce	—	18	17	2	0	0	0	1	7	0	1	0	118	167	118	284		200	39	6	139	-20	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	71	66	17	4	1	0	4	15	0	1	0	258	300	348	648	91	333	21	6	287	81	-2	+0	+0	+13	+2	1.4
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2006	18	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	—	194	178	40	3	1	1	12	30	0	7	4	225	274	270	543	45	254	15	6	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	331	308	87	10	3	5	9	62	4	5	5	282	312	383	695	101	321	19	3	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	485	442	107	16	4	1	32	72	4	16	4	242	299	303	602	61	283	15	7	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	MLB MLE	Florida Marlins	—	48	43	14	4	1	0	4	6	0	1	0	326	383	465	848	140	378	12	8	383	146	+3	+0	+1	+7	+1	1.2
2010	22	AA MLE	Jacksonville Suns	—	587	532	157	30	4	5	33	76	9	13	9	295	347	395	741	100	324	13	6	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	MLB MLE	Florida Marlins	—	23	23	3	0	0	0	0	9	0	0	0	130	130	130	261		214	39	0	120	-33	-4	+0	-0	+6	+0	0.3
2011	23	AAA MLE	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	371	344	80	13	1	3	16	73	5	11	4	233	277	302	579	70	278	20	4	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	340	320	56	10	0	0	12	66	2	4	0	175	210	206	416	31	213	19	4	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	50	45	9	3	1	0	5	8	0	1	0	200	280	311	591	111	225	16	10	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	277	260	57	10	0	3	12	42	2	5	4	219	259	292	551	73	249	15	4	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	269	251	70	10	2	0	12	36	0	4	0	279	312	335	646	56	311	13	4	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	122	111	19	2	1	2	6	25	1	1	0	171	220	261	482	90	178	20	5	194	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	477	445	102	12	1	1	24	80	2	9	4	229	272	267	539	38	270	17	5	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	365	349	76	8	2	4	11	66	0	7	2	218	242	287	528	69	248	18	3	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	154	147	29	2	0	1	4	33	0	3	0	197	219	231	450	34	241	21	3	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	51	49	12	3	0	1	2	2	0	0	0	245	275	367	642	122	247	4	4	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	18	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	—	194	178	40	3	1	1	12	30	0	7	4	225	274	270	543	45	264	15	6	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	18	ROK RAW	GCL Marlins	—	194	171	45	4	1	1	19	21	0	7	4	263	337	316	653	53	293	11	10	296	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	331	308	87	10	3	5	9	62	4	5	5	282	312	383	695	101	337	19	3	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	A RAW	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	331	304	90	11	3	6	13	46	4	5	5	296	333	411	745	115	331	14	4	323	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	485	442	107	16	4	1	32	72	4	16	4	242	299	303	602	61	286	15	7	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ RAW	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	485	433	110	16	5	1	41	51	4	16	4	254	324	321	645	67	285	11	8	293	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA MLE	3 teams	—	661	598	178	35	6	5	39	85	10	14	10	298	351	401	752	104	339	13	6	321	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA RAW	3 teams	—	661	584	174	33	5	6	53	74	10	14	10	298	366	402	769	104	332	11	8	340	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	559	523	117	19	1	4	23	116	6	15	5	224	264	287	551	63	278	21	4	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	559	505	123	17	4	3	41	82	6	15	5	244	308	311	619	67	283	15	7	281	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	473	444	77	13	0	0	17	92	3	4	0	173	209	203	412	29	218	19	4	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	473	439	100	20	1	0	22	63	3	4	0	228	269	278	547	50	265	13	5	246	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	3 teams	—	478	445	97	19	1	5	24	74	3	7	6	218	263	299	562	81	250	15	5	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA RAW	3 teams	—	478	430	111	24	3	6	39	67	3	7	6	258	324	370	694	112	292	14	8	310	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	558	516	124	17	4	2	26	87	3	5	1	240	281	300	581	60	282	16	5	255	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	558	497	140	22	6	5	45	72	3	5	1	282	345	380	725	99	318	13	8	320	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	2 teams	—	654	608	140	17	1	2	33	110	3	12	7	230	273	271	545	41	276	17	5	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA RAW	2 teams	—	654	584	131	14	3	2	57	84	3	12	7	224	297	269	565	45	257	13	9	260	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	527	499	109	11	3	6	16	95	3	9	3	218	247	289	536	70	257	18	3	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	527	488	117	19	2	5	27	71	3	9	3	240	284	318	601	78	270	13	5	268	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	205	196	41	5	0	2	6	36	0	3	0	209	233	265	498	56	245	18	3	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	205	192	46	6	0	2	10	30	0	3	0	240	277	302	579	62	273	15	5	260	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	INTL MLE	Gigantes de Carolina	—	125	107	27	4	0	1	17	6	0	6	2	252	355	318	673	65	257	5	14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	INTL RAW	Gigantes de Carolina	—	125	107	27	4	0	1	17	6	0	6	2	252	355	318	673	65	257	5	14	312	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	INTL MLE	Puerto Rico	—	151	135	33	4	0	4	13	24	1	2	2	244	315	363	678	119	266	16	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	INTL RAW	Puerto Rico	—	151	135	33	4	0	4	13	24	1	2	2	244	315	363	678	119	266	16	9	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	32	INTL MLE	Atenienses de Manati	—	56	43	12	0	0	0	8	6	2	0	0	279	415	279	694		308	11	14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	32	INTL RAW	Atenienses de Manati	—	56	43	12	0	0	0	8	6	2	0	0	279	415	279	694		308	11	14	320	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	INTL MLE	Gigantes de Carolina	—	124	109	22	4	0	3	13	17	0	0	1	202	285	321	606	119	211	14	10	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	INTL RAW	Gigantes de Carolina	—	124	109	22	4	0	3	13	17	0	0	1	202	285	321	606	119	211	14	10	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	34	INTL MLE	Gigantes de Carolina	—	113	103	24	1	0	0	7	13	1	2	1	233	288	243	531	10	267	12	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	34	INTL RAW	Gigantes de Carolina	—	113	103	24	1	0	0	7	13	1	2	1	233	288	243	531	10	267	12	6	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	35	INTL MLE	Leones de Ponce	—	35	32	5	0	0	1	3	6	0	0	0	156	229	250	479	94	160	17	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	35	INTL RAW	Leones de Ponce	—	35	32	5	0	0	1	3	6	0	0	0	156	229	250	479	94	160	17	9	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	36	INTL MLE	Leones de Ponce	—	124	105	26	3	0	0	13	22	1	0	0	248	336	276	612	29	302	18	10	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	36	INTL RAW	Leones de Ponce	—	124	105	26	3	0	0	13	22	1	0	0	248	336	276	612	29	302	18	10	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	37	INTL MLE	Leones de Ponce	—	18	17	2	0	0	0	1	7	0	1	0	118	167	118	284		200	39	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	37	INTL RAW	Leones de Ponce	—	18	17	2	0	0	0	1	7	0	1	0	118	167	118	284		200	39	6	139	-20	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	18	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	—	194	180	40	3	1	1	12	30	0	7	4	222	274	267	540	44	254	15	6	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	20	A MLE	Greensboro Grasshoppers	—	331	315	87	10	3	5	9	62	4	5	5	276	312	375	686	98	321	19	3	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	485	446	107	16	4	1	32	72	4	16	4	240	299	300	600	61	283	15	7	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA MLE	3 teams	—	661	607	178	35	6	5	39	85	10	14	10	293	351	395	746	102	328	13	6	321	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	559	525	117	19	1	4	23	116	6	15	5	223	264	286	550	63	274	21	4	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	473	450	77	13	0	0	17	92	3	4	0	171	209	200	409	29	213	19	4	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	3 teams	—	478	448	97	19	1	5	24	74	3	7	6	217	263	297	560	80	245	15	5	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	558	524	124	17	4	2	26	87	3	5	1	237	281	296	577	59	270	16	5	255	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	AA MLE	2 teams	—	654	613	140	17	1	2	33	110	3	12	7	228	273	269	542	41	270	17	5	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	527	503	109	11	3	6	16	95	3	9	3	217	247	286	533	70	248	18	3	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	205	197	41	5	0	2	6	36	0	3	0	208	233	264	497	56	242	18	3	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	71	66	17	4	1	0	4	15	0	1	0	258	300	348	648	91	333	21	6	287	35	-2	+0	+0	+13	+2	1.4
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	604	156	37	9	0	37	137	0	9	0	258	301	349	650	91	334	21	6	287	35	-15	+2	+3	+120	+14	12.6
Career	—	MLE		—	5871	5408	1268	181	24	42	312	960	44	108	51	234	282	300	582	66	276	16	5	219	35	-2	+0	+0	+13	+2	1.4
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	599	141	20	3	5	35	106	5	12	6	235	284	304	588	68	276	16	5	219	35	-15	+2	+3	+120	+14	12.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAAIowa Cubs · 154 PAwOBA .225 → .197 (−28)K% 18.2% → 21.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.18%	÷1.083	×1.290	—	—	21.66%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.90%	÷0.965	×0.710	—	×0.982	2.81%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×0.982	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷0.991	×0.900	×1.022	×0.982	22.78%
Doubles /BIP	1.72%	÷1.056	×0.810	×1.022	×0.982	1.33%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.042	×0.810	×1.022	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.86%	÷0.899	×0.780	—	×0.982	0.73%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 98, 2B 111, 3B 108, K 117, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .225 → .197; ISO .035 → .029; BABIP .267 → .241. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AATennessee Smokies · 51 PAwOBA .333 → .281 (−52)K% 3.9% → 4.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	3.92%	÷0.981	×1.220	—	—	4.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.88%	÷0.976	×0.680	—	×0.958	3.93%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.958	0.00%
Singles /BIP	19.57%	÷1.016	×0.920	×0.988	×0.958	16.77%
Doubles /BIP	8.70%	÷1.000	×0.910	×0.988	×0.958	7.49%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.880	×0.988	×0.958	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.17%	÷0.882	×0.800	—	×0.958	1.89%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 103, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 96, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 24.8 → −4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.

Result: wOBA .333 → .281; ISO .146 → .127; BABIP .289 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAANorfolk Tides · 365 PAwOBA .254 → .227 (−27)K% 14.8% → 18.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.79%	÷0.983	×1.200	—	—	18.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.66%	÷1.046	×0.690	—	×0.992	3.05%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.84%	÷1.027	×0.930	×1.041	×0.992	21.37%
Doubles /BIP	3.11%	÷1.021	×0.830	×1.041	×0.992	2.62%
Triples /BIP	0.69%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.041	×0.992	0.60%
Home runs /BIP	1.38%	÷0.776	×0.840	—	×0.992	1.49%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 55, 1B 105, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.041.

Result: wOBA .254 → .227; ISO .073 → .070; BABIP .268 → .248. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AABowie Baysox · 477 PAwOBA .274 → .240 (−34)K% 13.6% → 16.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.63%	÷0.989	×1.220	—	—	16.81%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.34%	÷1.014	×0.700	—	×0.978	4.95%
HBP% /PA	0.42%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.35%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.023	×0.970	×1.018	×0.978	23.60%
Doubles /BIP	3.80%	÷0.999	×0.860	×1.018	×0.978	3.26%
Triples /BIP	0.27%	÷1.123	×0.950	×1.018	×0.978	0.23%
Home runs /BIP	0.54%	÷1.197	×0.780	—	×0.978	0.35%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 139, 1B 105, 2B 100, 3B 125, K 98, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.

Result: wOBA .274 → .240; ISO .051 → .041; BABIP .290 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAGwinnett Braves · 269 PAwOBA .298 → .282 (−16)K% 10.8% → 13.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.78%	÷0.975	×1.200	—	—	13.26%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.32%	÷0.984	×0.690	—	×1.018	4.51%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	0.00%
Singles /BIP	26.64%	÷1.012	×0.930	×1.043	×1.018	26.00%
Doubles /BIP	5.14%	÷0.992	×0.830	×1.043	×1.018	4.57%
Triples /BIP	0.93%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.043	×1.018	0.84%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.120	×0.840	—	×1.018	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 124, 1B 102, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 95, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.043.

Result: wOBA .298 → .282; ISO .062 → .057; BABIP .324 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 122 PAwOBA .228 → .194 (−34)K% 16.4% → 20.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.39%	÷0.972	×1.220	—	—	20.59%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.38%	÷1.036	×0.680	—	×0.988	4.79%
HBP% /PA	0.82%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	0.68%
Singles /BIP	15.91%	÷1.014	×0.920	×1.050	×0.988	14.97%
Doubles /BIP	2.27%	÷1.053	×0.910	×1.050	×0.988	2.04%
Triples /BIP	1.14%	÷1.150	×0.880	×1.050	×0.988	0.90%
Home runs /BIP	2.27%	÷1.026	×0.800	—	×0.988	1.75%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 103, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 94, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .228 → .194; ISO .093 → .076; BABIP .193 → .178. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 277 PAwOBA .283 → .242 (−41)K% 12.6% → 15.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.64%	÷1.006	×1.220	—	—	15.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.86%	÷1.118	×0.680	—	×0.998	4.16%
HBP% /PA	0.72%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.61%
Singles /BIP	22.02%	÷1.053	×0.920	×1.046	×0.998	20.09%
Doubles /BIP	5.05%	÷1.080	×0.910	×1.046	×0.998	4.44%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.135	×0.880	×1.046	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.83%	÷1.001	×0.800	—	×0.998	1.46%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 111, 2B 116, 3B 127, K 101, BB 124 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.046.

Result: wOBA .283 → .242; ISO .091 → .077; BABIP .276 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 50 PAwOBA .316 → .245 (−70)K% 12.0% → 16.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.00%	÷0.938	×1.290	—	—	16.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.00%	÷1.071	×0.710	—	×1.033	9.59%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	13.51%	÷1.029	×0.900	—	×1.033	12.21%
Doubles /BIP	10.81%	÷1.082	×0.810	—	×1.033	8.36%
Triples /BIP	2.70%	÷1.150	×0.810	—	×1.033	1.97%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.004	×0.780	—	×1.033	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 101, 1B 106, 2B 116, 3B 130, K 88, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .316 → .245; ISO .140 → .106; BABIP .270 → .225. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .