Tyson Ross
P Detroit Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 30 | MIX3 levels | 18 | 16 | 79 | 6.92 | 5.27 | 15.4% | 14.0% | 0.1 | K 14.1% · BB 15.0% · FIP 5.46 | |
| 2018 | 31 | MLBSTL | 31 | 23 | 150 | 4.15 | 4.11 | 19.2% | 9.1% | 2.3 | ||
| 2019 | 32 | MLBDET | 7 | 7 | 35 | 6.11 | 5.79 | 15.4% | 11.1% | -0.2 | ||
| 2020 | 33 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 34 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 23 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 26 | 2 | 39 | 169 | 32 | 20 | 4 | 8% | 1.5 | 18.9% | 11.8% | 7.1% | 2.6% | 5.49 | 4.43 | +0.1 |
| 2010 | 23 | MLB RAW | Oakland Athletics | 26 | 2 | 39 | 169 | 32 | 20 | 4 | 8% | 1.5 | 18.9% | 11.8% | 7.1% | 2.4% | 5.49 | 4.32 | +0.1 |
| 2011 | 24 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 9 | 6 | 36 | 145 | 24 | 12 | 1 | 67% | 4.0 | 16.6% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 0.8% | 2.75 | 3.17 | +1.0 |
| 2011 | 24 | MLB RAW | Oakland Athletics | 9 | 6 | 36 | 145 | 24 | 12 | 1 | 67% | 4.0 | 16.6% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 0.7% | 2.75 | 3.13 | +1.0 |
| 2012 | 25 | MLB MLE | Oakland Athletics | 18 | 13 | 73 | 342 | 46 | 34 | 7 | 72% | 4.1 | 13.5% | 9.9% | 3.5% | 2.2% | 6.50 | 4.46 | +0.8 |
| 2012 | 25 | MLB RAW | Oakland Athletics | 18 | 13 | 73 | 342 | 46 | 34 | 7 | 72% | 4.1 | 13.5% | 9.9% | 3.5% | 2.0% | 6.50 | 4.48 | +0.8 |
| 2013 | 26 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 35 | 16 | 125 | 504 | 119 | 40 | 8 | 46% | 3.6 | 23.6% | 7.9% | 15.7% | 1.5% | 3.17 | 2.96 | +2.4 |
| 2013 | 26 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 35 | 16 | 125 | 504 | 119 | 40 | 8 | 46% | 3.6 | 23.6% | 7.9% | 15.7% | 1.6% | 3.17 | 2.99 | +2.4 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 31 | 31 | 196 | 811 | 195 | 70 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 24.0% | 8.6% | 15.4% | 1.6% | 2.81 | 3.02 | +5.9 |
| 2014 | 27 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 31 | 31 | 196 | 811 | 195 | 70 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 24.0% | 8.6% | 15.4% | 1.6% | 2.81 | 3.04 | +5.8 |
| 2015 | 28 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 33 | 33 | 196 | 823 | 212 | 81 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 25.8% | 9.8% | 15.9% | 1.1% | 3.26 | 2.76 | +6.6 |
| 2015 | 28 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 33 | 33 | 196 | 823 | 212 | 81 | 9 | 100% | 5.9 | 25.8% | 9.8% | 15.9% | 1.1% | 3.26 | 2.77 | +6.6 |
| 2016 | 29 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 2 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 3.0 | 17.6% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 0.0% | 16.50 | 2.73 | +0.2 |
| 2016 | 29 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 2 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 100% | 3.0 | 17.6% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 0.0% | 16.50 | 2.60 | +0.2 |
| 2017 | 30 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 18 | 16 | 79 | 371 | 57 | 52 | 10 | 89% | 4.4 | 14.1% | 15.0% | -0.9% | 3.0% | 6.92 | 5.46 | -0.0 |
| 2017 | 30 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 18 | 16 | 79 | 371 | 57 | 52 | 10 | 89% | 4.4 | 15.4% | 14.0% | 1.3% | 2.7% | 6.92 | 5.27 | +0.1 |
| 2018 | 31 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 31 | 23 | 150 | 634 | 122 | 58 | 17 | 74% | 4.8 | 19.2% | 9.1% | 10.1% | 2.9% | 4.15 | 4.22 | +2.1 |
| 2018 | 31 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 31 | 23 | 150 | 634 | 122 | 58 | 17 | 74% | 4.8 | 19.2% | 9.1% | 10.1% | 2.7% | 4.15 | 4.11 | +2.3 |
| 2019 | 32 | MLB MLE | Detroit Tigers | 7 | 7 | 35 | 162 | 25 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 5.0 | 15.4% | 11.1% | 4.3% | 4.5% | 6.11 | 5.68 | -0.1 |
| 2019 | 32 | MLB RAW | Detroit Tigers | 7 | 7 | 35 | 162 | 25 | 18 | 7 | 100% | 5.0 | 15.4% | 11.1% | 4.3% | 4.3% | 6.11 | 5.79 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 203 | 142 | 905 | 3855 | 816 | 371 | 73 | 70% | 4.5 | 21.2% | 9.6% | 11.5% | 1.9% | 4.04 | 3.58 | +20.0 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 203 | 142 | 905 | 3855 | 816 | 371 | 73 | 70% | 4.5 | 21.2% | 9.6% | 11.5% | 1.9% | 4.04 | 3.57 | +20.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 45 | 31 | 200 | 852 | 180 | 82 | 16 | 70% | 4.5 | 21.2% | 9.6% | 11.5% | 1.9% | 4.04 | 3.57 | +4.4 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 210 | 149 | 936 | 3995 | 833 | 392 | 79 | 71% | 4.5 | 20.9% | 9.8% | 11.1% | 2.0% | 4.13 | 3.67 | +20.0 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 45 | 32 | 200 | 854 | 178 | 84 | 17 | 71% | 4.5 | 20.9% | 9.8% | 11.1% | 2.0% | 4.13 | 3.67 | +4.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 AAARound Rock Express · 19 IPFIP 5.58 → 5.77 (+0.18)K% 12.9% → 11.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.94% | — | ×0.880 | 11.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.94% | — | ×1.050 | 13.59% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.53% | ÷1.117 | ×1.100 | 3.48% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 123).
Result: FIP 5.58 → 5.77, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 12 IPFIP 2.40 → 2.84 (+0.44)K% 20.8% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.83% | — | ×0.810 | 16.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.33% | — | ×1.100 | 9.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.089 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 2.40 → 2.84, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).