Jonathan Mota

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1987-06-01

Age (2027)40

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	26	AA/INTL2 orgs	493	.271/.351/.406	10	2	86	—	.239/.289/.354
2014	27	AAA/AA/INTL3 orgs	448	.244/.277/.333	5	4	38	—	.208/.230/.276
2015	28	AAA/AA2 orgs	332	.252/.298/.340	4	2	39	—	.211/.242/.291

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2006	19	A+	Daytona Cubs	—	190	170	42	6	2	1	9	26	1	1	1	247	289	324	612	76	283	14	5	263	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A	Peoria Chiefs	—	100	91	25	2	1	0	6	14	1	2	3	275	327	319	645	44	321	14	6	290	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A+	Daytona Cubs	—	151	134	31	8	1	1	11	21	2	4	3	231	299	328	628	97	265	14	7	279	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A	Peoria Chiefs	—	251	220	61	17	1	2	24	42	1	9	5	277	351	391	742	114	333	17	10	327	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+	Daytona Cubs	—	365	323	84	17	2	4	26	59	4	6	6	260	323	362	685	102	304	16	7	300	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A	Peoria Chiefs	—	27	22	5	2	0	0	5	5	0	0	0	227	370	318	689	91	294	19	19	325	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	370	320	76	16	2	2	35	59	7	2	6	237	326	319	645	81	284	16	9	292	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	33	30	8	0	0	1	3	7	0	0	0	267	333	367	700	100	318	21	9	318	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	23	23	5	2	0	0	0	6	0	0	0	217	217	304	522	87	294	26	0	230	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A	Peoria Chiefs	—	177	160	45	8	0	2	10	21	4	0	0	281	339	369	708	88	309	12	6	317	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	220	204	59	15	1	5	9	32	2	1	1	289	326	446	772	157	318	15	4	334	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	81	77	17	4	0	2	2	14	1	0	1	221	250	351	601	130	246	17	2	264	29	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	18	17	4	1	1	1	1	3	0	0	0	235	278	588	866	353	231	17	6	366	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	63	58	17	4	0	3	5	16	0	0	0	293	349	517	866	224	359	25	8	380	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	341	301	83	15	2	7	31	61	4	2	1	276	351	409	760	133	322	18	9	337	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	INTL	Leones de Ponce	—	152	130	34	7	1	3	16	30	2	0	3	262	351	400	751	138	316	20	11	331	110	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	152	142	37	5	1	3	5	36	0	1	0	261	286	373	659	113	318	24	3	284	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	187	175	43	8	1	1	9	34	0	2	1	246	283	320	603	74	298	18	5	268	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	INTL	Senadores de San Juan	—	109	101	22	5	0	1	4	14	1	1	0	218	255	297	552	79	241	13	4	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	252	234	59	9	2	3	14	43	1	2	1	252	297	346	643	94	298	17	6	287	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	80	72	18	2	0	1	5	10	0	0	0	250	299	319	618	69	270	12	6	271	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2006	19	A+ MLE	Daytona Cubs	—	190	172	43	6	2	1	7	37	1	1	1	250	283	326	609	76	287	19	4	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	100	93	25	2	1	0	4	19	1	2	3	269	306	312	618	43	321	19	4	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A+ MLE	Daytona Cubs	—	151	136	30	8	1	1	9	30	2	4	3	221	279	316	595	96	266	20	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	251	227	55	14	1	2	17	57	1	9	5	242	298	339	637	97	306	23	7	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	Daytona Cubs	—	365	329	80	17	2	4	20	84	4	6	6	243	295	343	638	100	294	23	5	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	27	23	5	2	0	0	4	7	0	0	0	217	333	304	638	87	264	26	15	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	370	331	73	15	2	2	24	72	7	2	6	221	287	296	583	76	268	19	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	33	31	7	0	0	1	2	9	0	0	0	226	273	323	595	97	294	27	6	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	23	23	5	2	0	0	0	8	0	0	0	217	217	304	522	87	266	35	0	181	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	177	163	40	7	0	1	7	28	4	0	0	245	293	307	600	61	282	16	4	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	220	208	52	12	1	4	5	43	2	1	1	250	274	375	649	125	285	20	2	284	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	81	78	14	3	0	2	1	18	1	0	1	179	200	295	495	115	211	22	1	211	29	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	18	17	4	1	1	1	1	4	0	0	0	235	278	588	866	353	197	22	6	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	63	60	14	3	0	2	3	20	0	0	0	233	270	383	653	150	322	32	5	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	341	314	75	14	2	6	18	77	4	2	1	239	289	354	642	115	287	23	5	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	152	144	29	3	1	2	3	47	0	1	0	201	218	278	495	76	261	31	2	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	187	178	38	6	1	1	6	42	0	2	1	213	239	275	514	62	263	22	3	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	252	239	50	7	2	3	9	53	1	2	1	209	241	293	534	84	250	21	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	80	74	16	2	0	1	3	13	0	0	0	216	247	284	531	68	231	16	4	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	290	265	68	8	3	1	11	56	2	3	4	257	291	321	612	64	318	19	4	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	290	261	67	8	3	1	15	40	2	3	4	257	302	322	624	65	296	14	5	272	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	402	363	86	22	2	3	26	87	3	13	8	237	293	333	627	96	302	22	6	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A RAW	2 teams	—	402	354	92	25	2	3	35	63	3	13	8	260	332	367	699	107	307	16	9	309	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	392	352	84	18	2	4	24	91	4	6	6	239	295	335	630	97	308	23	6	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	392	345	89	19	2	4	31	64	4	6	6	258	326	359	686	101	304	16	8	302	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	370	331	73	15	2	2	24	72	7	2	6	221	287	296	583	76	274	19	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA RAW	Tennessee Smokies	—	370	320	76	16	2	2	35	59	7	2	6	237	326	319	645	81	284	16	9	292	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A MLE	3 teams	—	233	217	51	8	0	2	9	45	4	0	0	235	278	300	578	65	285	19	4	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A RAW	3 teams	—	233	213	58	10	0	3	13	34	4	0	0	272	326	362	688	89	309	15	6	308	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	301	286	66	15	1	6	6	61	3	1	2	231	254	353	607	122	270	20	2	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	301	281	76	19	1	7	11	46	3	1	2	270	305	420	725	149	299	15	4	315	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	81	77	18	4	1	3	4	24	0	0	0	234	272	429	700	195	300	30	5	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	81	75	21	5	1	4	6	19	0	0	0	280	333	533	867	253	327	23	7	377	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	493	451	109	20	3	9	27	111	6	2	4	242	293	359	653	118	299	23	5	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA RAW	2 teams	—	493	431	117	22	3	10	47	91	6	2	4	271	351	406	757	135	320	18	10	335	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	3 teams	—	448	425	88	12	2	4	11	118	1	4	1	207	229	273	502	66	272	26	2	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA RAW	3 teams	—	448	418	102	18	2	5	18	84	1	4	1	244	277	333	609	89	290	19	4	267	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	332	312	65	9	2	3	13	65	1	2	1	208	242	279	521	71	252	20	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	332	306	77	11	2	4	19	53	1	2	1	252	298	340	637	88	291	16	6	283	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	290	275	68	8	3	1	11	56	2	3	4	247	291	309	600	62	299	19	4	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	402	370	86	22	2	3	26	87	3	13	8	232	293	327	620	95	291	22	6	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	392	361	84	18	2	4	24	91	4	6	6	233	295	327	622	94	292	23	6	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	370	336	73	15	2	2	24	72	7	2	6	217	287	292	579	74	268	19	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A MLE	3 teams	—	233	218	51	8	0	2	9	45	4	0	0	234	278	298	576	64	282	19	4	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	301	289	66	15	1	6	6	61	3	1	2	228	254	349	604	121	265	20	2	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	81	77	18	4	1	3	4	24	0	0	0	234	272	429	700	195	294	30	5	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	493	457	109	20	3	9	27	111	6	2	4	239	293	354	648	116	287	23	5	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	3 teams	—	448	433	88	12	2	4	11	118	1	4	1	203	229	268	497	65	262	26	2	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	332	315	65	9	2	3	13	65	1	2	1	206	242	276	519	70	245	20	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	3342	3079	708	131	18	37	155	730	31	33	32	230	274	320	594	90	287	22	5	257	60	-159	-6	+0	+36	+72	-5.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	599	138	25	4	7	30	142	6	6	6	230	274	321	595	90	288	22	5	257	60	-31	-1	+0	+7	+14	-1.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAAIowa Cubs · 252 PAwOBA .277 → .226 (−51)K% 17.1% → 20.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.06%	÷1.051	×1.290	—	—	20.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.16%	÷0.996	×0.710	—	×0.992	3.65%
HBP% /PA	0.40%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	0.39%
Singles /BIP	23.56%	÷1.008	×0.900	×0.965	×0.992	20.14%
Doubles /BIP	4.71%	÷0.984	×0.810	×0.965	×0.992	3.71%
Triples /BIP	1.05%	÷0.948	×0.810	×0.965	×0.992	0.86%
Home runs /BIP	1.57%	÷0.916	×0.780	—	×0.992	1.33%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 83, 1B 102, 2B 97, 3B 90, K 110, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.

Result: wOBA .277 → .226; ISO .094 → .076; BABIP .298 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AATennessee Smokies · 80 PAwOBA .271 → .228 (−43)K% 12.5% → 15.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.50%	÷0.967	×1.220	—	—	15.77%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.25%	÷0.959	×0.680	—	×0.968	4.29%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	24.19%	÷1.026	×0.920	×0.988	×0.968	20.75%
Doubles /BIP	3.23%	÷0.998	×0.910	×0.988	×0.968	2.81%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.058	×0.880	×0.988	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.61%	÷1.048	×0.800	—	×0.968	1.19%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 105, 2B 100, 3B 112, K 93, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.

Result: wOBA .271 → .228; ISO .069 → .057; BABIP .270 → .231. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AATennessee Smokies · 187 PAwOBA .260 → .219 (−41)K% 18.2% → 22.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.18%	÷0.980	×1.220	—	—	22.63%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.28%	÷0.948	×0.680	—	×0.978	3.00%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.978	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.40%	÷0.958	×0.920	×0.978	×0.978	21.49%
Doubles /BIP	5.67%	÷1.140	×0.910	×0.978	×0.978	4.33%
Triples /BIP	0.71%	÷1.065	×0.880	×0.978	×0.978	0.56%
Home runs /BIP	0.71%	÷1.009	×0.800	—	×0.978	0.55%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 92, 2B 128, 3B 113, K 96, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .260 → .219; ISO .074 → .056; BABIP .298 → .263. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAIowa Cubs · 152 PAwOBA .283 → .219 (−64)K% 23.7% → 30.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.68%	÷0.996	×1.290	—	—	30.67%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.29%	÷1.249	×0.710	—	×1.003	1.88%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	26.42%	÷1.021	×0.900	×0.963	×1.003	22.50%
Doubles /BIP	4.72%	÷1.111	×0.810	×0.963	×1.003	3.32%
Triples /BIP	0.94%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.963	×1.003	0.64%
Home runs /BIP	2.83%	÷0.929	×0.780	—	×1.003	2.38%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 104, 2B 122, 3B 130, K 99, BB 150 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.

Result: wOBA .283 → .219; ISO .113 → .085; BABIP .318 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AATennessee Smokies · 341 PAwOBA .329 → .280 (−50)K% 17.9% → 22.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.89%	÷0.968	×1.220	—	—	22.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.50%	÷1.060	×0.680	—	×0.988	5.39%
HBP% /PA	1.17%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	0.97%
Singles /BIP	24.58%	÷0.990	×0.920	×0.972	×0.988	21.94%
Doubles /BIP	6.25%	÷0.970	×0.910	×0.972	×0.988	5.63%
Triples /BIP	0.83%	÷0.935	×0.880	×0.972	×0.988	0.75%
Home runs /BIP	2.92%	÷0.920	×0.800	—	×0.988	2.51%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 98, 2B 94, 3B 87, K 94, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.972.

Result: wOBA .329 → .280; ISO .133 → .118; BABIP .322 → .287. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AATennessee Smokies · 63 PAwOBA .364 → .297 (−67)K% 25.4% → 31.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.40%	÷0.976	×1.220	—	—	31.75%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.35%	÷0.983	×0.680	—	×0.998	4.38%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.81%	÷0.991	×0.920	—	×0.998	22.07%
Doubles /BIP	9.52%	÷1.033	×0.910	—	×0.998	8.37%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.082	×0.880	—	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.14%	÷1.028	×0.800	—	×0.998	5.55%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 106, 1B 98, 2B 107, 3B 116, K 95, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .364 → .297; ISO .224 → .174; BABIP .359 → .322. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAAIowa Cubs · 18 PAwOBA .355 → .297 (−58)K% 16.7% → 21.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.67%	÷1.004	×1.290	—	—	21.42%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.56%	÷0.938	×0.710	—	×1.033	4.34%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	7.14%	÷1.028	×0.900	—	×1.033	6.46%
Doubles /BIP	7.14%	÷1.049	×0.810	—	×1.033	5.70%
Triples /BIP	7.14%	÷0.953	×0.810	—	×1.033	6.27%
Home runs /BIP	7.14%	÷0.863	×0.780	—	×1.033	6.67%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 106, 2B 110, 3B 91, K 101, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .355 → .297; ISO .353 → .301; BABIP .231 → .197. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAIowa Cubs · 220 PAwOBA .325 → .284 (−42)K% 14.5% → 19.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.55%	÷0.965	×1.290	—	—	19.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.18%	÷1.043	×0.710	—	×1.048	2.27%
HBP% /PA	0.91%	—	×0.980	—	×1.048	0.93%
Singles /BIP	22.09%	÷0.980	×0.900	×0.977	×1.048	20.77%
Doubles /BIP	8.72%	÷1.017	×0.810	×0.977	×1.048	7.11%
Triples /BIP	0.58%	÷1.086	×0.810	×0.977	×1.048	0.44%
Home runs /BIP	2.91%	÷0.934	×0.780	—	×1.048	2.54%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 96, 2B 103, 3B 117, K 93, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.977.

Result: wOBA .325 → .284; ISO .157 → .130; BABIP .318 → .285. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .