Mario Ivan Santana

PosC

B/TR/R

Born1976-05-23

Age (2027)51

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2017

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2015	39	AAA/INTL2 orgs	275	.235/.305/.319	5	1	43	—	.222/.272/.291
2016	40	AAAPericos de Pu…	87	.295/.353/.397	2	0	60	—	.250/.294/.312
2017	41	AAAAcereros del …	31	.192/.276/.269	0	0	24	—	.192/.276/.269

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	29	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	342	293	90	10	0	2	38	27	2	2	6	307	390	362	752	55	328	8	11	338	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	30	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	381	330	92	18	0	3	45	33	3	5	4	279	370	361	731	82	302	9	12	334	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	31	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	448	389	128	23	2	5	36	31	2	4	5	329	389	437	826	108	346	7	8	354	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	32	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	422	378	111	17	4	1	25	37	2	0	5	294	340	368	708	74	322	9	6	308	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	33	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	354	311	84	14	0	1	27	28	1	0	3	270	329	325	654	55	292	8	8	288	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	34	AAA	Sultanes de Monterrey	—	202	165	42	4	0	0	21	18	2	1	1	255	346	279	625	24	284	9	10	275	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	34	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	90	83	21	8	0	0	6	8	0	1	0	253	303	349	653	96	276	9	7	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	35	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	357	300	90	20	1	5	41	39	1	3	2	300	386	423	809	123	331	11	11	350	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	35	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	55	45	13	2	0	0	7	6	0	1	1	289	385	333	718	44	333	11	13	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	36	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	324	283	68	11	1	4	31	31	1	2	0	240	317	329	646	88	258	10	10	289	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	36	INTL	Venados de Mazatlan	—	180	147	33	3	0	2	23	19	3	0	3	224	341	286	627	61	244	11	13	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	37	AAA	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	276	235	59	10	0	1	25	28	3	0	1	251	331	306	637	55	280	10	9	283	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	37	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	92	83	19	4	0	0	8	8	0	1	1	229	297	277	574	48	253	9	9	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	38	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	293	256	61	7	0	3	25	33	4	1	0	238	316	301	617	62	262	11	9	279	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	38	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	60	55	10	0	0	1	3	4	0	0	0	182	224	236	461	55	180	7	5	205	25	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	39	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	176	153	40	3	0	4	13	15	3	1	0	261	331	359	691	98	269	9	7	303	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	39	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	99	85	16	2	0	1	7	14	1	0	0	188	258	247	505	59	208	14	7	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	40	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	87	78	23	2	0	2	6	9	1	0	0	295	353	397	750	103	313	10	7	332	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	41	AAA	Acereros del Norte	—	31	26	5	2	0	0	1	5	2	0	1	192	276	269	545	77	238	16	3	240	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	29	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	342	305	89	9	0	1	26	32	2	2	6	292	351	331	682	39	309	9	8	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	30	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	381	346	88	16	0	2	29	40	3	5	4	254	317	318	635	64	279	10	8	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	31	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	448	404	127	21	2	4	21	37	2	4	5	314	351	406	757	92	318	8	5	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	32	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	422	390	108	15	4	1	14	44	2	0	5	277	305	344	649	67	294	10	3	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	33	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	354	323	81	12	0	1	16	34	1	0	3	251	288	297	585	46	264	10	5	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	34	AAA MLE	Sultanes de Monterrey	—	202	174	43	4	0	0	12	21	2	1	1	247	303	270	573	23	256	10	6	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	35	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	357	317	86	18	1	4	24	48	1	3	2	271	325	372	697	101	291	13	7	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	36	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	324	296	63	10	1	3	18	38	1	2	0	213	260	284	544	71	227	12	6	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	37	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	276	245	55	8	0	1	15	34	3	0	1	224	278	269	547	45	244	12	5	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	38	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	293	266	52	5	0	2	15	43	4	1	0	195	249	237	486	41	221	15	5	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	39	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	176	158	35	2	0	3	8	20	3	1	0	222	272	291	563	70	224	11	5	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	40	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	87	80	20	2	0	1	4	12	1	0	0	250	294	312	607	62	262	14	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	41	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	31	26	5	2	0	0	1	6	2	0	1	192	276	269	545	77	199	19	3	204	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	29	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	342	305	89	9	0	1	26	32	2	2	6	292	351	331	682	39	319	9	8	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	29	AAA RAW	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	342	293	90	10	0	2	38	27	2	2	6	307	390	362	752	55	328	8	11	338	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	30	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	381	346	88	16	0	2	29	40	3	5	4	254	317	318	635	64	282	10	8	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	30	AAA RAW	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	381	330	92	18	0	3	45	33	3	5	4	279	370	361	731	82	302	9	12	334	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	31	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	448	404	127	21	2	4	21	37	2	4	5	314	351	406	757	92	337	8	5	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	31	AAA RAW	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	448	389	128	23	2	5	36	31	2	4	5	329	389	437	826	108	346	7	8	354	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	32	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	422	390	108	15	4	1	14	44	2	0	5	277	305	344	649	67	308	10	3	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	32	AAA RAW	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	422	378	111	17	4	1	25	37	2	0	5	294	340	368	708	74	322	9	6	308	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	33	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	354	323	81	12	0	1	16	34	1	0	3	251	288	297	585	46	276	10	5	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	33	AAA RAW	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	354	311	84	14	0	1	27	28	1	0	3	270	329	325	654	55	292	8	8	288	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	292	258	62	5	0	0	17	31	2	2	1	240	292	260	552	19	271	11	6	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	34	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	292	248	63	12	0	0	27	26	2	2	1	254	332	302	635	48	281	9	9	280	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	35	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	412	365	99	21	1	5	28	56	1	4	3	271	325	375	700	104	308	14	7	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	35	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	412	345	103	22	1	5	48	45	1	4	3	299	386	412	797	113	331	11	12	346	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	36	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	504	456	99	15	2	5	28	59	4	2	3	217	268	292	560	75	239	12	6	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	36	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	504	430	101	14	1	6	54	50	4	2	3	235	326	314	640	79	253	10	11	288	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	37	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	368	330	73	11	0	1	21	46	3	1	2	221	274	264	538	42	254	12	6	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	37	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	368	318	78	14	0	1	33	36	3	1	2	245	322	299	621	53	273	10	9	278	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	38	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	353	321	64	6	0	3	18	52	4	1	0	199	251	246	497	47	228	15	5	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	38	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	353	311	71	7	0	4	28	37	4	1	0	228	300	289	590	61	247	10	8	267	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	39	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	275	246	55	4	0	4	12	31	4	1	0	224	271	289	560	65	239	11	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	39	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	275	238	56	5	0	5	20	29	4	1	0	235	305	319	625	84	248	11	7	274	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	40	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	87	80	20	2	0	1	4	12	1	0	0	250	294	312	607	62	284	14	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	40	AAA RAW	Pericos de Puebla	—	87	78	23	2	0	2	6	9	1	0	0	295	353	397	750	103	313	10	7	332	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	41	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	31	26	5	2	0	0	1	6	2	0	1	192	276	269	545	77	250	19	3	204	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	41	AAA RAW	Acereros del Norte	—	31	26	5	2	0	0	1	5	2	0	1	192	276	269	545	77	238	16	3	240	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	29	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	342	311	89	9	0	1	26	32	2	2	6	286	351	325	676	39	309	9	8	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	30	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	381	346	88	16	0	2	29	40	3	5	4	254	317	318	635	64	279	10	8	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	31	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	448	422	127	21	2	4	21	37	2	4	5	301	351	389	740	88	318	8	5	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	32	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	422	403	108	15	4	1	14	44	2	0	5	268	305	333	638	65	294	10	3	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	33	AAA MLE	Olmecas de Tabasco	—	354	334	81	12	0	1	16	34	1	0	3	243	288	287	576	45	264	10	5	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	292	271	62	5	0	0	17	31	2	2	1	229	292	247	540	18	256	11	6	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	35	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	412	380	99	21	1	5	28	56	1	4	3	261	325	361	685	100	291	14	7	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	36	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	504	467	99	15	2	5	28	59	4	2	3	212	268	285	553	73	227	12	6	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	37	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	368	341	73	11	0	1	21	46	3	1	2	214	274	255	529	41	244	12	6	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	38	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	353	328	64	6	0	3	18	52	4	1	0	195	251	241	492	46	221	15	5	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	39	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	275	257	55	4	0	4	12	31	4	1	0	214	271	276	547	62	224	11	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	40	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	87	82	20	2	0	1	4	12	1	0	0	244	294	305	599	61	262	14	5	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	41	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	31	28	5	2	0	0	1	6	2	0	1	179	276	250	526	71	199	19	3	204	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4269	3850	970	139	9	28	235	480	31	22	33	252	300	315	615	63	280	11	6	265	66	-175	-9	+0	+76	+92	-1.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	586	147	21	1	4	36	73	5	3	5	251	300	311	610	60	279	11	6	265	66	-27	-1	+0	+12	+14	-0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAAAcereros del Norte · 31 PAwOBA .234 → .204 (−30)K% 16.1% → 19.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.13%	÷0.996	×1.200	—	—	19.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.23%	÷0.985	×0.690	—	×0.940	2.12%
HBP% /PA	6.45%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	5.70%
Singles /BIP	14.29%	÷1.025	×0.930	—	×0.940	12.18%
Doubles /BIP	9.52%	÷0.958	×0.830	—	×0.940	7.75%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.109	×0.920	—	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.969	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 105, 2B 92, 3B 122, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 41 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (13.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .234 → .204; ISO .077 → .067; BABIP .238 → .199. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAPericos de Puebla · 87 PAwOBA .323 → .257 (−66)K% 10.3% → 13.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.34%	÷0.921	×1.200	—	—	13.48%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.90%	÷1.091	×0.690	—	×0.940	4.10%
HBP% /PA	1.15%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	1.02%
Singles /BIP	27.54%	÷1.048	×0.930	×1.027	×0.940	23.59%
Doubles /BIP	2.90%	÷1.075	×0.830	×1.027	×0.940	2.16%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.008	×0.920	×1.027	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.90%	÷1.024	×0.700	—	×0.940	1.86%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 110, 2B 115, 3B 102, K 84, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 40 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (12.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.027.

Result: wOBA .323 → .257; ISO .103 → .070; BABIP .313 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAPericos de Puebla · 176 PAwOBA .295 → .237 (−58)K% 8.5% → 11.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.52%	÷0.913	×1.200	—	—	11.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.39%	÷1.080	×0.690	—	×0.940	4.44%
HBP% /PA	1.70%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	1.51%
Singles /BIP	23.91%	÷1.075	×0.930	×1.050	×0.940	20.41%
Doubles /BIP	2.17%	÷1.100	×0.830	×1.050	×0.940	1.62%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.050	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.90%	÷1.062	×0.700	—	×0.940	1.80%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 115, 2B 120, 3B 130, K 83, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 39 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (11.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .295 → .237; ISO .098 → .067; BABIP .269 → .224. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAPericos de Puebla · 293 PAwOBA .273 → .219 (−54)K% 11.3% → 14.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.26%	÷0.914	×1.200	—	—	14.79%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.53%	÷1.071	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.17%
HBP% /PA	1.37%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	1.21%
Singles /BIP	22.87%	÷1.068	×0.930	×1.050	×0.940	19.65%
Doubles /BIP	3.14%	÷1.108	×0.830	×1.050	×0.940	2.32%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.050	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.35%	÷0.957	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.92%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 114, 2B 122, 3B 130, K 83, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 38 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (10.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .273 → .219; ISO .062 → .046; BABIP .262 → .221. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 276 PAwOBA .277 → .237 (−40)K% 10.1% → 12.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.14%	÷0.972	×1.200	—	—	12.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.06%	÷1.050	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.59%
HBP% /PA	1.09%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.96%
Singles /BIP	23.19%	÷1.034	×0.930	×1.050	×0.940	20.59%
Doubles /BIP	4.83%	÷1.040	×0.830	×1.050	×0.940	3.80%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.920	×1.050	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.48%	÷0.875	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.36%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 107, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 94, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 37 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (9.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .277 → .237; ISO .055 → .047; BABIP .280 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 324 PAwOBA .279 → .236 (−43)K% 9.6% → 11.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.57%	÷0.982	×1.200	—	—	11.70%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.95%	÷1.046	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.55%
HBP% /PA	0.31%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.27%
Singles /BIP	20.63%	÷1.029	×0.930	×1.050	×0.940	18.41%
Doubles /BIP	4.37%	÷0.984	×0.830	×1.050	×0.940	3.63%
Triples /BIP	0.40%	÷0.952	×0.920	×1.050	×0.940	0.38%
Home runs /BIP	1.59%	÷0.933	×0.700	—	×0.940	1.12%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 106, 2B 97, 3B 90, K 96, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 36 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (8.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .279 → .236; ISO .088 → .073; BABIP .258 → .227. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAOlmecas de Tabasco · 357 PAwOBA .339 → .297 (−42)K% 10.9% → 13.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.92%	÷0.974	×1.200	—	—	13.46%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.64%	÷1.032	×0.690	—	×0.940	6.69%
HBP% /PA	0.28%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.25%
Singles /BIP	24.52%	÷1.019	×0.930	×1.050	×0.940	22.09%
Doubles /BIP	7.66%	÷0.991	×0.830	×1.050	×0.940	6.34%
Triples /BIP	0.38%	÷1.040	×0.920	×1.050	×0.940	0.33%
Home runs /BIP	1.92%	÷0.828	×0.700	—	×0.940	1.52%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 66, 1B 104, 2B 98, 3B 108, K 95, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 35 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .339 → .297; ISO .123 → .110; BABIP .331 → .291. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAASultanes de Monterrey · 202 PAwOBA .266 → .245 (−21)K% 8.9% → 10.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.91%	÷1.006	×1.200	—	—	10.63%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.41%	÷1.030	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.92%
HBP% /PA	0.99%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.87%
Singles /BIP	25.85%	÷1.009	×0.930	×1.050	×0.940	23.51%
Doubles /BIP	2.72%	÷0.984	×0.830	×1.050	×0.940	2.27%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.137	×0.920	×1.050	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.947	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 102, 2B 97, 3B 127, K 101, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 34 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .266 → .245; ISO .024 → .023; BABIP .284 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .