Trent Oeltjen

PosLF

B/TL/L

Born1983-02-28

Age (2027)44

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	30	AAA/INTL2 orgs	445	.277/.366/.527	18	22	90	—	.186/.261/.342
2014	31	AAA/INTL2 orgs	259	.252/.328/.448	8	5	98	—	.125/.192/.181
2016	33	INTLBrisbane Band…	64	.167/.286/.407	4	0	92	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	22	A+	Fort Myers Miracle	—	395	341	98	17	4	4	26	77	20	21	9	287	372	396	768	109	357	19	7	343	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	464	401	120	16	10	3	36	58	16	23	11	299	380	411	791	112	342	12	8	349	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	271	244	58	9	5	2	10	44	13	14	7	238	303	340	644	102	283	16	4	289	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	AAA	Tucson Sidewinders	—	491	442	140	28	10	6	24	68	10	15	7	317	366	466	832	149	354	14	5	358	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	MLB	Arizona Diamondbacks	—	73	70	17	4	1	3	1	13	0	3	1	243	254	457	711	214	255	18	1	299	89	-1	+0	+1	-6	+2	-0.4
2009	26	AAA	Reno Aces	—	488	442	134	29	14	10	31	101	10	22	8	303	362	500	862	197	373	21	6	375	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	MLB	Los Angeles Dodgers	—	30	23	5	1	1	0	4	8	1	0	0	217	357	348	705	130	333	27	13	305	104	+0	+0	-2	+2	+1	0.1
2010	27	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	523	465	149	42	7	13	44	102	5	27	7	320	385	525	910	204	383	20	8	393	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	MLB	Los Angeles Dodgers	—	91	71	14	1	1	2	13	30	1	6	0	197	329	324	653	127	293	33	14	285	79	-2	+1	-1	-5	+2	-0.4
2011	28	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	212	180	61	14	3	8	25	50	4	7	4	339	431	583	1.014	244	431	24	12	436	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	122	104	36	6	1	6	10	30	5	6	1	346	429	596	1.025	250	435	25	8	437	182	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	456	402	118	22	8	13	35	106	7	14	9	294	360	485	845	192	363	23	8	363	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	50	44	10	2	0	1	4	14	2	2	0	227	320	341	661	114	310	28	8	305	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	387	333	85	30	2	14	37	110	10	21	7	255	347	483	831	228	335	28	10	360	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	INTL	Sydney Blue Sox	—	58	50	21	6	1	4	4	11	3	1	3	420	491	820	1.311	400	472	19	7	546	256	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA	Reno Aces	—	80	68	12	1	0	2	10	25	0	2	1	176	282	279	561	103	238	31	12	257	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	INTL	Sydney Blue Sox	—	179	162	46	16	2	6	13	44	3	3	0	284	348	519	867	235	354	25	7	377	141	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	INTL	Brisbane Bandits	—	64	54	9	1	0	4	9	18	0	0	1	167	286	407	693	241	152	28	14	305	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	194	164	36	6	3	5	18	51	2	9	1	220	304	384	688	165	279	26	9	293	85	-4	+1	-2	-9	+4	-0.8
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	22	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	395	347	87	16	3	3	20	109	20	21	9	251	328	340	668	89	340	28	5	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	464	412	123	15	10	2	25	71	16	23	11	299	362	398	760	100	341	15	5	328	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	271	247	57	8	5	2	7	53	13	14	7	231	288	328	616	97	283	20	3	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	AAA MLE	Tucson Sidewinders	—	491	449	129	24	9	5	17	88	10	15	7	287	328	414	742	127	322	18	3	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	MLB MLE	Arizona Diamondbacks	—	73	70	17	4	1	3	1	13	0	3	1	243	254	457	711	214	255	18	1	299	89	-1	+0	+1	-6	+2	-0.4
2009	26	AAA MLE	Reno Aces	—	488	453	116	24	11	8	20	130	10	22	8	256	302	411	713	155	337	27	4	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	MLB MLE	Los Angeles Dodgers	—	30	23	5	1	1	0	4	8	1	0	0	217	357	348	705	130	333	27	13	323	104	+0	+0	-2	+2	+1	0.1
2010	27	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	523	481	118	31	5	8	28	137	5	27	7	245	294	380	674	135	314	26	5	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	MLB MLE	Los Angeles Dodgers	—	91	72	14	1	1	2	12	30	1	6	0	194	318	319	637	125	293	33	13	284	79	-2	+1	-1	-5	+2	-0.4
2011	28	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	212	191	46	11	2	5	14	70	4	7	4	241	306	398	704	157	334	33	7	307	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	456	414	92	15	6	9	23	146	7	14	9	222	275	353	627	130	300	32	5	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	387	345	64	22	1	10	25	147	10	21	7	186	261	342	603	157	276	38	6	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA MLE	Reno Aces	—	80	72	9	1	0	1	6	33	0	2	1	125	192	181	373	56	185	41	8	172	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	395	347	87	16	3	3	20	109	20	21	9	251	328	340	668	89	353	28	5	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ RAW	Fort Myers Miracle	—	395	341	98	17	4	4	26	77	20	21	9	287	372	396	768	109	357	19	7	343	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	464	412	123	15	10	2	25	71	16	23	11	299	362	398	760	100	355	15	5	328	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	AA RAW	New Britain Rock Cats	—	464	401	120	16	10	3	36	58	16	23	11	299	380	411	791	112	342	12	8	349	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	271	247	57	8	5	2	7	53	13	14	7	231	288	328	616	97	286	20	3	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AAA RAW	Rochester Red Wings	—	271	244	58	9	5	2	10	44	13	14	7	238	303	340	644	102	283	16	4	289	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	AAA MLE	Tucson Sidewinders	—	491	449	129	24	9	5	17	88	10	15	7	287	328	414	742	127	338	18	3	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	AAA RAW	Tucson Sidewinders	—	491	442	140	28	10	6	24	68	10	15	7	317	366	466	832	149	354	14	5	358	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	561	523	133	28	12	11	21	143	10	25	9	254	296	417	713	163	329	25	4	305	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	561	512	151	33	15	13	32	114	10	25	9	295	348	494	843	199	357	20	6	365	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	553	504	124	32	7	8	32	145	6	27	7	246	299	385	684	139	326	26	6	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	553	488	154	43	8	13	48	110	6	27	7	316	384	516	900	201	381	20	9	388	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	425	367	83	16	4	10	36	140	10	19	5	226	312	373	686	147	330	33	8	300	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	425	355	111	21	5	16	48	110	10	19	5	313	409	535	944	223	408	26	11	404	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	506	459	102	17	6	10	26	162	9	16	9	222	277	351	628	129	314	32	5	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	506	446	128	24	8	14	39	120	9	16	9	287	356	471	827	184	358	24	8	358	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	445	395	74	25	1	12	29	169	13	22	10	187	265	347	612	159	284	38	7	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	445	383	106	36	3	18	41	121	13	22	10	277	366	527	894	251	355	27	9	384	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	259	234	28	2	0	4	19	108	3	5	1	120	195	179	375	60	194	42	7	172	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	INTL RAW	2 teams	—	259	230	58	17	2	8	23	69	3	5	1	252	328	448	776	196	323	27	9	340	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	INTL MLE	Brisbane Bandits	—	64	54	9	1	0	4	9	18	0	0	1	167	286	407	693	241	152	28	14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	INTL RAW	Brisbane Bandits	—	64	54	9	1	0	4	9	18	0	0	1	167	286	407	693	241	152	28	14	305	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	395	352	87	16	3	3	20	109	20	21	9	247	328	335	663	88	340	28	5	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	464	420	123	15	10	2	25	71	16	23	11	293	362	390	753	98	341	15	5	328	108	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	271	249	57	8	5	2	7	53	13	14	7	229	288	325	614	96	283	20	3	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	AAA MLE	Tucson Sidewinders	—	491	461	129	24	9	5	17	88	10	15	7	280	328	403	731	124	322	18	3	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	561	525	133	28	12	11	21	143	10	25	9	253	296	415	711	162	326	25	4	305	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	553	510	124	32	7	8	32	145	6	27	7	243	299	380	679	137	315	26	6	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	425	376	83	16	4	10	36	140	10	19	5	221	312	364	677	144	322	33	8	300	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	506	466	102	17	6	10	26	162	9	16	9	219	277	345	623	127	300	32	5	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	445	400	74	25	1	12	29	169	13	22	10	185	265	343	608	158	276	38	7	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	259	235	28	2	0	4	19	108	3	5	1	119	195	179	374	60	185	42	7	172	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	194	164	36	6	3	5	18	51	2	9	1	220	304	384	688	165	279	26	9	293	78	-4	+1	-2	-9	+4	-0.8
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	549	121	20	10	17	60	171	7	30	3	220	305	386	691	166	280	26	9	293	78	-12	+5	-5	-29	+14	-2.8
Career	—	MLE		—	4434	3991	949	184	57	71	241	1206	110	187	76	238	299	366	665	128	319	27	5	284	78	-4	+1	-2	-9	+4	-0.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	585	138	27	8	10	35	177	16	27	11	236	297	361	658	125	317	27	5	284	78	-12	+5	-5	-29	+14	-2.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2014 AAAReno Aces · 80 PAwOBA .248 → .172 (−76)K% 31.2% → 41.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.25%	÷0.965	×1.290	—	—	41.78%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.25%	÷1.049	×0.710	—	×0.962	7.33%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×0.962	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.93%	÷1.047	×0.900	×0.966	×0.962	16.72%
Doubles /BIP	2.33%	÷1.047	×0.810	×0.966	×0.962	1.67%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.966	×0.962	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.65%	÷1.116	×0.780	—	×0.962	3.13%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 109, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 93, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.966.

Result: wOBA .248 → .172; ISO .103 → .066; BABIP .238 → .185. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAASalt Lake Bees · 387 PAwOBA .353 → .264 (−89)K% 28.4% → 38.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.42%	÷0.964	×1.290	—	—	38.02%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.56%	÷1.016	×0.710	—	×0.972	6.50%
HBP% /PA	2.58%	—	×0.980	—	×0.972	2.46%
Singles /BIP	17.49%	÷0.997	×0.900	×0.995	×0.972	15.26%
Doubles /BIP	13.45%	÷0.977	×0.810	×0.995	×0.972	10.78%
Triples /BIP	0.90%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.995	×0.972	0.61%
Home runs /BIP	6.28%	÷0.973	×0.780	—	×0.972	4.89%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 99, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 93, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.995.

Result: wOBA .353 → .264; ISO .228 → .164; BABIP .335 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 456 PAwOBA .356 → .272 (−84)K% 23.2% → 32.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.25%	÷0.935	×1.290	—	—	32.06%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.02%	÷0.962	×0.710	—	×0.982	5.08%
HBP% /PA	1.54%	—	×0.980	—	×0.982	1.48%
Singles /BIP	25.34%	÷1.034	×0.900	×1.025	×0.982	22.18%
Doubles /BIP	7.43%	÷1.135	×0.810	×1.025	×0.982	5.34%
Triples /BIP	2.70%	÷1.055	×0.810	×1.025	×0.982	2.09%
Home runs /BIP	4.39%	÷1.018	×0.780	—	×0.982	3.31%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 107, 2B 127, 3B 111, K 87, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.

Result: wOBA .356 → .272; ISO .192 → .135; BABIP .363 → .300. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 212 PAwOBA .420 → .307 (−113)K% 23.6% → 32.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.58%	÷0.928	×1.290	—	—	32.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.43%	÷1.012	×0.710	—	×0.992	6.56%
HBP% /PA	1.89%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	1.83%
Singles /BIP	27.69%	÷1.096	×0.900	×0.987	×0.992	22.26%
Doubles /BIP	10.77%	÷1.012	×0.810	×0.987	×0.992	8.43%
Triples /BIP	2.31%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.987	×0.992	1.59%
Home runs /BIP	6.15%	÷1.173	×0.780	—	×0.992	4.06%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 135, 1B 119, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 86, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.

Result: wOBA .420 → .307; ISO .244 → .165; BABIP .431 → .334. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 523 PAwOBA .383 → .294 (−90)K% 19.5% → 26.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.50%	÷0.961	×1.290	—	—	26.18%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.65%	÷1.019	×0.710	—	×1.003	5.35%
HBP% /PA	0.96%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.94%
Singles /BIP	23.97%	÷1.056	×0.900	×1.016	×1.003	20.81%
Doubles /BIP	11.57%	÷1.082	×0.810	×1.016	×1.003	8.83%
Triples /BIP	1.93%	÷1.053	×0.810	×1.016	×1.003	1.51%
Home runs /BIP	3.58%	÷1.223	×0.780	—	×1.003	2.29%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 145, 1B 111, 2B 116, 3B 111, K 92, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.016.

Result: wOBA .383 → .294; ISO .204 → .142; BABIP .383 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 AAAReno Aces · 488 PAwOBA .363 → .306 (−58)K% 20.7% → 26.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.70%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	26.70%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.74%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.018	4.15%
HBP% /PA	2.05%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	2.04%
Singles /BIP	23.75%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.026	×1.018	22.33%
Doubles /BIP	8.50%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.026	×1.018	7.20%
Triples /BIP	4.11%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.026	×1.018	3.47%
Home runs /BIP	2.93%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.018	2.33%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.

Result: wOBA .363 → .306; ISO .197 → .157; BABIP .373 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AAATucson Sidewinders · 491 PAwOBA .355 → .317 (−38)K% 13.8% → 17.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.85%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	17.87%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.68%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.033	3.44%
HBP% /PA	2.04%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	2.06%
Singles /BIP	25.67%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.012	×1.033	24.16%
Doubles /BIP	7.49%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.012	×1.033	6.34%
Triples /BIP	2.67%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.012	×1.033	2.26%
Home runs /BIP	1.60%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.033	1.29%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.

Result: wOBA .355 → .317; ISO .149 → .126; BABIP .354 → .322. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2007 AAARochester Red Wings · 271 PAwOBA .280 → .270 (−10)K% 16.2% → 19.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.24%	÷1.000	×1.200	—	—	19.48%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.32%	÷1.000	×0.690	—	×1.048	2.40%
HBP% /PA	4.80%	—	×0.940	—	×1.048	4.73%
Singles /BIP	21.00%	÷1.000	×0.930	×1.041	×1.048	21.31%
Doubles /BIP	4.50%	÷1.000	×0.830	×1.041	×1.048	4.08%
Triples /BIP	2.50%	÷1.000	×0.970	×1.041	×1.048	2.65%
Home runs /BIP	1.00%	÷1.000	×0.840	—	×1.048	0.88%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.041.

Result: wOBA .280 → .270; ISO .102 → .098; BABIP .283 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .