Amadeo Zazueta

Pos2B

B/TR/R

Born1986-01-31

Age (2027)41

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2023

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR
2021	35	INTLMexico	188	.259/.291/.333	1	1	71	—
2022	36	INTLCharros de Ja…	298	.311/.334/.385	1	0	101	—
2023	37	INTLCharros de Ja…	37	.091/.189/.121	0	0	-6	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	19	ROK	VSL Astros	—	227	202	62	19	2	7	19	29	2	2	5	307	371	525	895	218	325	13	8	386	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	ROK	Greeneville Astros	—	57	53	9	2	0	1	3	9	0	0	0	170	214	264	478	94	186	16	5	214	-8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	A+	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	97	92	15	4	0	2	2	11	1	2	0	163	189	272	461	109	165	11	2	202	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	124	116	31	4	1	3	8	17	0	0	0	267	315	397	711	129	292	14	6	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AA	San Antonio Missions	—	54	53	15	1	1	1	0	9	0	1	0	283	283	396	679	113	318	17	0	293	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	INTL	Mayos de Navojoa	—	188	169	47	4	0	1	9	22	2	0	1	278	322	320	642	41	315	12	5	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA	Tucson Padres	—	121	115	21	4	1	0	1	19	1	0	0	183	197	235	431	52	216	16	1	187	-3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	A+	Dunedin Blue Jays	—	23	21	9	2	1	1	0	3	0	0	0	429	429	762	1.190	333	421	13	0	469	185	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	INTL	Mayos de Navojoa	—	67	60	18	2	2	0	4	7	2	1	0	300	364	400	764	100	333	10	6	339	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AA	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	160	155	33	8	0	1	2	17	1	0	0	213	228	284	512	71	234	11	1	226	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	77	69	22	3	0	1	4	3	0	1	0	319	356	406	762	87	313	4	5	325	106	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	233	212	71	7	5	2	10	14	1	9	5	335	368	443	811	108	347	6	4	346	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA	Acereros del Norte	—	471	418	129	18	3	3	27	42	3	13	6	309	355	388	742	79	336	9	6	319	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	261	244	71	10	2	2	8	23	1	3	2	291	316	373	689	82	314	9	3	299	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA	Acereros del Norte	—	432	405	138	26	2	9	21	42	1	8	4	341	375	481	856	141	361	10	5	375	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	273	259	73	14	2	2	12	14	0	4	1	282	314	375	688	93	291	5	4	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	32	INTL	Mexico	—	307	277	80	14	0	6	16	24	4	2	3	289	337	404	741	116	294	8	5	322	104	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA	Sultanes de Monterrey	—	434	387	126	28	3	7	27	29	9	6	3	326	383	468	851	142	334	7	6	370	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	275	257	82	11	0	1	9	24	4	1	0	319	352	374	725	54	348	9	3	323	105	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	34	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	176	160	53	7	0	4	10	19	1	1	3	331	372	450	822	119	350	11	6	358	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	35	INTL	Mexico	—	188	174	45	10	0	1	6	20	2	1	0	259	291	333	625	75	284	11	3	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	36	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	298	283	88	14	2	1	9	22	1	0	1	311	334	385	720	74	332	7	3	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	37	INTL	Charros de Jalisco	—	37	33	3	1	0	0	3	5	1	0	0	91	189	121	310	30	107	14	8	160	-6	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	19	ROK MLE	VSL Astros	—	227	210	38	11	1	3	12	35	2	2	5	181	232	286	518	105	201	15	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	57	54	7	1	0	1	2	13	0	0	0	130	161	204	364	74	151	23	4	156	-8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	A+ MLE	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	97	93	15	4	0	2	1	16	1	2	0	161	179	269	448	108	163	16	1	178	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	54	53	13	1	1	1	0	12	0	1	0	245	245	358	604	113	289	22	0	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	Tucson Padres	—	121	115	19	3	1	0	1	25	1	0	0	165	179	209	388	43	200	21	1	164	-3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	A+ MLE	Dunedin Blue Jays	—	23	21	8	2	1	1	0	4	0	0	0	381	381	714	1.095	333	355	17	0	441	185	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AA MLE	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	160	156	32	7	0	1	1	21	1	0	0	205	215	269	484	64	226	13	1	203	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	471	429	126	16	3	2	16	51	3	13	6	294	324	359	683	65	308	11	3	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA MLE	Acereros del Norte	—	432	413	123	23	2	6	13	51	1	8	4	298	321	407	728	109	319	12	3	313	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA MLE	Sultanes de Monterrey	—	434	399	102	19	2	5	15	38	9	6	3	256	298	351	649	95	261	9	3	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	19	ROK MLE	VSL Astros	—	227	210	38	11	1	3	12	35	2	2	5	181	232	286	518	105	200	15	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	19	ROK RAW	VSL Astros	—	227	202	62	19	2	7	19	29	2	2	5	307	371	525	895	218	325	13	8	386	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	57	54	7	1	0	1	2	13	0	0	0	130	161	204	364	74	150	23	4	156	-8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	ROK RAW	Greeneville Astros	—	57	53	9	2	0	1	3	9	0	0	0	170	214	264	478	94	186	16	5	214	-8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	221	215	32	8	0	4	3	36	1	2	0	149	164	242	406	93	160	16	1	178	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	INTL RAW	2 teams	—	221	208	46	8	1	5	10	28	1	2	0	221	260	341	602	120	234	13	5	267	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	242	231	60	4	5	4	0	52	2	1	1	260	266	372	638	113	318	21	0	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	INTL RAW	2 teams	—	242	222	62	5	1	2	9	31	2	1	1	279	313	338	651	59	316	13	4	284	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	211	200	39	7	2	1	1	43	3	1	0	195	211	265	476	70	237	20	0	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	211	196	48	8	4	1	5	29	3	1	0	245	275	342	616	97	276	14	2	266	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AA MLE	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	160	156	32	7	0	1	1	21	1	0	0	205	215	269	484	64	231	13	1	203	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AA RAW	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	160	155	33	8	0	1	2	17	1	0	0	213	228	284	512	71	234	11	1	226	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	INTL MLE	Charros de Jalisco	—	77	69	22	3	0	1	4	3	0	1	0	319	356	406	762	87	313	4	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	INTL RAW	Charros de Jalisco	—	77	69	22	3	0	1	4	3	0	1	0	319	356	406	762	87	313	4	5	325	106	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	INTL MLE	Charros de Jalisco	—	233	212	71	7	5	2	10	14	1	9	5	335	368	443	811	108	347	6	4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	INTL RAW	Charros de Jalisco	—	233	212	71	7	5	2	10	14	1	9	5	335	368	443	811	108	347	6	4	346	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	732	672	196	25	4	4	25	79	4	16	8	292	321	359	680	67	324	11	3	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	732	662	200	28	5	5	35	65	4	16	8	302	341	382	723	80	328	9	5	312	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	705	676	200	37	3	10	21	82	1	12	5	296	318	404	722	108	323	12	3	313	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	705	664	211	40	4	11	33	56	1	12	5	318	351	440	791	122	333	8	5	348	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	32	INTL MLE	Mexico	—	307	277	80	14	0	6	16	24	4	2	3	289	337	404	741	116	294	8	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	32	INTL RAW	Mexico	—	307	277	80	14	0	6	16	24	4	2	3	289	337	404	741	116	294	8	5	322	104	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	709	655	167	31	4	8	25	62	13	7	3	255	296	351	647	96	269	9	4	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	709	644	208	39	3	8	36	53	13	7	3	323	371	430	801	107	340	7	5	352	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	34	INTL MLE	Charros de Jalisco	—	176	160	53	7	0	4	10	19	1	1	3	331	372	450	822	119	350	11	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	34	INTL RAW	Charros de Jalisco	—	176	160	53	7	0	4	10	19	1	1	3	331	372	450	822	119	350	11	6	358	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	35	INTL MLE	Mexico	—	188	174	45	10	0	1	6	20	2	1	0	259	291	333	625	75	284	11	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	35	INTL RAW	Mexico	—	188	174	45	10	0	1	6	20	2	1	0	259	291	333	625	75	284	11	3	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	36	INTL MLE	Charros de Jalisco	—	298	283	88	14	2	1	9	22	1	0	1	311	334	385	720	74	332	7	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	36	INTL RAW	Charros de Jalisco	—	298	283	88	14	2	1	9	22	1	0	1	311	334	385	720	74	332	7	3	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	37	INTL MLE	Charros de Jalisco	—	37	33	3	1	0	0	3	5	1	0	0	91	189	121	310	30	107	14	8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	37	INTL RAW	Charros de Jalisco	—	37	33	3	1	0	0	3	5	1	0	0	91	189	121	310	30	107	14	8	160	-6	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	19	ROK MLE	VSL Astros	—	227	211	38	11	1	3	12	35	2	2	5	180	232	284	517	104	201	15	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	57	55	7	1	0	1	2	13	0	0	0	127	161	200	361	73	151	23	4	156	-8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	221	215	32	8	0	4	3	36	1	2	0	149	164	242	406	93	163	16	1	178	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	242	238	60	4	5	4	0	52	2	1	1	252	266	361	627	109	289	21	0	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	211	205	39	7	2	1	1	43	3	1	0	190	211	259	469	68	225	20	0	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	AA MLE	New Hampshire Fisher Cats	—	160	157	32	7	0	1	1	21	1	0	0	204	215	268	483	64	226	13	1	203	24	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	732	697	196	25	4	4	25	79	4	16	8	281	321	346	667	65	308	11	3	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	705	677	200	37	3	10	21	82	1	12	5	295	318	403	721	108	319	12	3	313	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	709	665	167	31	4	8	25	62	13	7	3	251	296	346	642	95	261	9	4	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4580	4277	1133	187	26	51	148	530	37	55	34	265	295	357	652	92	290	12	3	190	15	-464	-3	+0	+16	+99	-35.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	607	161	27	4	7	21	75	5	8	5	265	295	357	652	92	291	12	3	190	15	-66	-0	+0	+2	+14	-5.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AAASultanes de Monterrey · 434 PAwOBA .362 → .282 (−81)K% 6.7% → 8.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	6.68%	÷0.922	×1.200	—	—	8.70%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.76%	÷1.058	×0.690	—	×0.942	3.54%
HBP% /PA	2.07%	—	×0.940	—	×0.942	1.84%
Singles /BIP	24.58%	÷1.002	×0.930	×0.950	×0.942	20.42%
Doubles /BIP	7.82%	÷1.149	×0.830	×0.950	×0.942	5.06%
Triples /BIP	0.84%	÷1.091	×0.920	×0.950	×0.942	0.63%
Home runs /BIP	1.96%	÷0.997	×0.700	—	×0.942	1.29%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 100, 2B 130, 3B 118, K 84, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 33 vs a level average of 27.2 → −5.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .362 → .282; ISO .142 → .098; BABIP .334 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAAAcereros del Norte · 432 PAwOBA .366 → .313 (−53)K% 9.7% → 11.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.72%	÷0.996	×1.200	—	—	11.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.40%	÷0.985	×0.690	—	×0.962	2.96%
HBP% /PA	0.23%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	0.21%
Singles /BIP	27.82%	÷1.025	×0.930	×1.030	×0.962	25.00%
Doubles /BIP	7.16%	÷0.958	×0.830	×1.030	×0.962	6.14%
Triples /BIP	0.55%	÷1.109	×0.920	×1.030	×0.962	0.45%
Home runs /BIP	2.48%	÷0.969	×0.700	—	×0.962	1.72%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 105, 2B 92, 3B 122, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .366 → .313; ISO .141 → .111; BABIP .361 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAAcereros del Norte · 471 PAwOBA .310 → .287 (−23)K% 8.9% → 10.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.92%	÷0.989	×1.200	—	—	10.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.31%	÷1.059	×0.690	—	×0.972	3.36%
HBP% /PA	0.64%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	0.58%
Singles /BIP	27.93%	÷1.011	×0.930	×1.048	×0.972	26.16%
Doubles /BIP	4.79%	÷1.013	×0.830	×1.048	×0.972	4.00%
Triples /BIP	0.80%	÷1.124	×0.920	×1.048	×0.972	0.67%
Home runs /BIP	0.80%	÷0.941	×0.700	—	×0.972	0.58%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 102, 2B 103, 3B 125, K 98, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.048.

Result: wOBA .310 → .287; ISO .079 → .068; BABIP .336 → .308. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AANew Hampshire Fisher Cats · 160 PAwOBA .220 → .203 (−17)K% 10.6% → 13.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.62%	÷0.969	×1.220	—	—	13.38%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	1.25%	÷1.007	×0.700	—	×0.978	0.85%
HBP% /PA	0.62%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.52%
Singles /BIP	17.39%	÷0.986	×0.970	×1.050	×0.978	17.57%
Doubles /BIP	5.80%	÷1.042	×0.860	×1.050	×0.978	4.91%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.068	×0.950	×1.050	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.72%	÷0.975	×0.780	—	×0.978	0.57%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 97, 2B 108, 3B 114, K 94, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .220 → .203; ISO .071 → .058; BABIP .234 → .226. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAATucson Padres · 121 PAwOBA .184 → .164 (−19)K% 15.7% → 20.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.70%	÷0.979	×1.290	—	—	20.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.83%	÷1.052	×0.710	—	×1.018	0.57%
HBP% /PA	0.83%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.82%
Singles /BIP	16.67%	÷1.007	×0.900	×1.050	×1.018	15.91%
Doubles /BIP	4.17%	÷1.013	×0.810	×1.050	×1.018	3.56%
Triples /BIP	1.04%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.050	×1.018	0.78%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.050	×0.780	—	×1.018	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 101, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 96, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .184 → .164; ISO .052 → .042; BABIP .216 → .200. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Dunedin Blue Jays · 23 PAwOBA .498 → .441 (−57)K% 13.0% → 18.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.04%	÷1.001	×1.420	—	—	18.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.00%	÷1.020	×0.750	—	×0.968	0.00%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	27.78%	÷1.034	×0.920	—	×0.968	23.92%
Doubles /BIP	11.11%	÷1.111	×0.960	—	×0.968	9.29%
Triples /BIP	5.56%	÷1.014	×0.810	—	×0.968	4.30%
Home runs /BIP	5.56%	÷0.944	×0.880	—	×0.968	5.01%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 107, 2B 122, 3B 103, K 100, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .498 → .441; ISO .333 → .294; BABIP .421 → .355. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AASan Antonio Missions · 54 PAwOBA .290 → .257 (−34)K% 16.7% → 21.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.67%	÷0.950	×1.220	—	—	21.41%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.00%	÷1.128	×0.700	—	×0.998	0.00%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	27.27%	÷1.069	×0.920	×1.050	×0.998	24.60%
Doubles /BIP	2.27%	÷1.037	×0.840	×1.050	×0.998	1.93%
Triples /BIP	2.27%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.050	×0.998	2.49%
Home runs /BIP	2.27%	÷0.889	×0.800	—	×0.998	2.04%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 114, 2B 107, 3B 80, K 90, BB 126 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .290 → .257; ISO .113 → .104; BABIP .318 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 A+Myrtle Beach Pelicans · 97 PAwOBA .196 → .178 (−18)K% 11.3% → 16.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.34%	÷0.985	×1.420	—	—	16.35%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.06%	÷1.009	×0.630	—	×0.988	1.27%
HBP% /PA	1.03%	—	×0.860	—	×0.988	0.88%
Singles /BIP	11.11%	÷0.954	×0.940	×1.050	×0.988	11.36%
Doubles /BIP	4.94%	÷0.916	×0.830	×1.050	×0.988	4.64%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.800	×1.050	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.47%	÷1.048	×0.900	—	×0.988	2.10%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 91, 2B 83, 3B 130, K 97, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .196 → .178; ISO .109 → .094; BABIP .165 → .163. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .