Jose Gil

PosC

B/TR/R

Born1986-09-04

Age (2027)40

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	27	AAA/INTL2 orgs	190	.329/.409/.488	6	3	145	—	.261/.370/.304
2015	28	AAA/INTL2 orgs	201	.254/.333/.379	4	1	98	—	.071/.188/.071
2016	29	INTLTiburones de …	120	.304/.408/.451	3	1	149	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	18	ROK	GCL Yankees	—	162	140	39	11	0	1	19	18	1	1	1	279	369	379	747	100	309	11	12	337	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	80	74	14	1	0	0	4	15	1	0	0	189	241	203	443	14	233	19	5	207	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	148	136	30	4	0	5	10	32	0	0	1	221	274	360	634	140	250	22	7	281	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	270	246	59	17	0	1	14	41	4	8	4	240	292	321	613	81	282	15	5	273	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	37	36	7	2	0	2	0	7	0	0	0	194	194	417	611	222	185	19	0	255	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	104	96	20	4	0	0	5	24	0	0	0	208	248	250	498	42	278	23	5	222	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	119	106	25	6	1	5	9	23	2	0	0	236	308	453	761	217	253	19	8	330	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	156	141	36	4	0	5	11	31	2	4	0	255	318	390	708	135	292	20	7	315	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	INTL	Venezuela	—	86	80	19	6	0	2	3	14	1	0	0	237	274	388	661	150	262	16	3	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA	Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Yankees	—	17	16	4	1	0	0	0	4	0	0	0	250	250	312	562	62	333	24	0	235	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	290	249	63	17	0	6	33	40	3	2	1	253	347	394	741	141	277	14	11	330	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	90	81	22	8	1	1	7	16	0	1	0	272	330	432	762	160	323	18	8	330	110	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	284	248	53	12	0	6	23	48	3	6	2	214	288	335	623	121	237	17	8	274	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	130	120	37	8	0	1	8	25	1	1	0	308	357	400	757	92	379	19	6	339	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AAA	Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders	—	25	23	7	0	0	0	2	3	0	0	0	304	360	304	664		350	12	8	309	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	59	53	12	2	0	0	5	13	1	1	1	226	305	264	569	38	300	22	8	268	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	142	114	32	6	1	4	22	21	3	1	3	281	410	456	866	175	311	15	15	382	144	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA	Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders	—	27	22	6	1	0	0	4	6	1	0	0	273	407	318	726	45	375	22	15	346	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	INTL	Venezuela	—	163	142	48	7	0	6	16	32	1	3	1	338	409	514	923	176	400	20	10	399	156	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	16	13	1	0	0	0	3	4	0	0	0	77	250	77	327		111	25	19	187	-23	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	185	164	44	8	1	4	16	21	2	1	1	268	341	402	743	134	286	11	9	329	109	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	INTL	Tiburones de La Guaira	—	120	102	31	6	0	3	14	17	4	1	2	304	408	451	859	147	341	14	12	388	149	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	162	147	32	8	0	1	12	26	1	1	1	218	281	293	574	75	249	16	7	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	80	75	13	1	0	0	3	20	1	0	0	173	215	187	402	13	224	25	4	178	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	148	139	26	3	0	4	7	43	0	0	1	187	226	295	521	108	228	29	5	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	270	251	55	16	0	1	9	58	4	8	4	219	258	295	552	76	272	21	3	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	37	36	7	2	0	2	0	9	0	0	0	194	194	417	611	222	174	24	0	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	104	97	18	4	0	0	4	34	0	0	0	186	218	227	445	41	270	33	4	189	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	119	109	25	6	1	4	6	27	2	0	0	229	282	413	695	183	253	23	5	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	156	145	31	4	0	4	7	44	2	4	0	214	260	324	584	110	272	28	4	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA MLE	Scranton/Wilkes-Barre Yankees	—	17	16	4	1	0	0	0	5	0	0	0	250	250	312	562	62	323	29	0	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	290	260	62	15	0	6	22	50	3	2	1	238	305	365	671	127	265	17	8	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	284	254	51	10	0	5	17	59	3	6	2	201	259	299	558	98	225	21	6	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AAA MLE	Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders	—	25	24	7	0	0	0	1	4	0	0	0	292	320	292	612		336	16	4	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	59	55	10	1	0	0	3	16	1	1	1	182	237	200	437	18	273	27	5	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA MLE	Scranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders	—	27	23	6	1	0	0	3	7	1	0	0	261	370	304	675	43	348	26	11	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	16	14	1	0	0	0	2	5	0	0	0	71	188	71	259		97	31	12	134	-23	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	162	147	32	8	0	1	12	26	1	1	1	218	281	293	574	75	254	16	7	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	18	ROK RAW	GCL Yankees	—	162	140	39	11	0	1	19	18	1	1	1	279	369	379	747	100	309	11	12	337	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	80	75	13	1	0	0	3	20	1	0	0	173	215	187	402	13	232	25	4	178	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A RAW	Charleston RiverDogs	—	80	74	14	1	0	0	4	15	1	0	0	189	241	203	443	14	233	19	5	207	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	148	139	26	3	0	4	7	43	0	0	1	187	226	295	521	108	237	29	5	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A RAW	Charleston RiverDogs	—	148	136	30	4	0	5	10	32	0	0	1	221	274	360	634	140	250	22	7	281	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	270	251	55	16	0	1	9	58	4	8	4	219	258	295	552	76	278	21	3	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ RAW	Tampa Yankees	—	270	246	59	17	0	1	14	41	4	8	4	240	292	321	613	81	282	15	5	273	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	141	133	24	5	0	2	4	43	0	0	0	180	204	263	468	83	250	30	3	195	18	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	141	132	27	6	0	2	5	31	0	0	0	205	234	295	529	91	253	22	4	231	18	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	361	333	74	13	1	11	17	94	5	4	0	222	270	366	637	144	273	26	5	274	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	361	327	80	16	1	12	23	68	5	4	0	245	304	410	714	165	272	19	6	313	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	3 teams	—	397	357	86	21	0	8	29	72	3	3	1	241	303	367	670	126	278	18	7	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA RAW	3 teams	—	397	346	89	26	1	7	40	60	3	3	1	257	339	399	738	142	290	15	10	326	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	414	375	74	15	0	7	24	86	4	7	2	197	253	293	546	96	233	21	6	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	414	368	90	20	0	7	31	73	4	7	2	245	310	356	666	111	283	18	7	294	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	INTL MLE	3 teams	—	226	207	47	4	0	0	12	52	4	2	4	227	283	246	529	19	301	23	5	234	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	INTL RAW	3 teams	—	226	190	51	8	1	4	29	37	4	2	4	268	377	384	761	116	313	16	13	344	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	190	164	39	6	0	0	20	52	2	3	1	238	328	274	602	37	345	27	11	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	INTL RAW	2 teams	—	190	164	54	8	0	6	20	38	2	3	1	329	409	488	896	159	397	20	11	391	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	201	170	10	0	0	0	26	68	2	1	1	59	192	59	251		97	34	13	134	-23	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	INTL RAW	2 teams	—	201	177	45	8	1	4	19	25	2	1	1	254	333	379	712	124	275	12	9	318	-23	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	INTL MLE	Tiburones de La Guaira	—	120	102	31	6	0	3	14	17	4	1	2	304	408	451	859	147	341	14	12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	INTL RAW	Tiburones de La Guaira	—	120	102	31	6	0	3	14	17	4	1	2	304	408	451	859	147	341	14	12	388	149	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	18	ROK MLE	GCL Yankees	—	162	148	32	8	0	1	12	26	1	1	1	216	281	291	572	74	249	16	7	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	80	76	13	1	0	0	3	20	1	0	0	171	215	184	399	13	224	25	4	178	7	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	148	140	26	3	0	4	7	43	0	0	1	186	226	293	519	107	228	29	5	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	270	255	55	16	0	1	9	58	4	8	4	216	258	290	548	75	272	21	3	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	141	136	24	5	0	2	4	43	0	0	0	176	204	257	462	81	245	30	3	195	18	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	361	336	74	13	1	11	17	94	5	4	0	220	270	363	634	143	264	26	5	274	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	3 teams	—	397	362	86	21	0	8	29	72	3	3	1	238	303	362	665	124	268	18	7	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	414	383	74	15	0	7	24	86	4	7	2	193	253	287	540	94	225	21	6	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	INTL MLE	3 teams	—	226	208	47	4	0	0	12	52	4	2	4	226	283	245	528	19	292	23	5	234	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	190	166	39	6	0	0	20	52	2	3	1	235	328	271	599	36	348	27	11	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	INTL MLE	2 teams	—	201	171	10	0	0	0	26	68	2	1	1	58	192	58	250		97	34	13	134	-23	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2710	2453	511	98	1	37	177	631	30	30	17	208	270	294	564	86	262	23	7	232	43	-183	-1	+0	+48	+59	-7.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	588	123	24	0	9	42	151	7	7	4	209	270	296	566	87	263	23	6	232	43	-44	-0	+0	+12	+14	-1.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAASalt Lake Bees · 16 PAwOBA .184 → .134 (−51)K% 25.0% → 33.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.00%	÷0.952	×1.290	—	—	33.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	18.75%	÷1.025	×0.710	—	×0.982	12.76%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×0.982	0.00%
Singles /BIP	11.11%	÷1.012	×0.900	—	×0.982	9.70%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.001	×0.810	—	×0.982	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.987	×0.810	—	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.980	×0.780	—	×0.982	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 102, 2B 100, 3B 97, K 90, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .184 → .134; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .111 → .097. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAScranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders · 27 PAwOBA .338 → .288 (−50)K% 22.2% → 27.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.22%	÷0.970	×1.200	—	—	27.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.81%	÷0.985	×0.690	—	×0.992	10.29%
HBP% /PA	3.70%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	3.45%
Singles /BIP	31.25%	÷0.984	×0.930	—	×0.992	29.29%
Doubles /BIP	6.25%	÷0.936	×0.830	—	×0.992	5.50%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.954	×0.970	—	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.067	×0.840	—	×0.992	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 97, 2B 87, 3B 91, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .338 → .288; ISO .045 → .040; BABIP .375 → .348. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AATrenton Thunder · 59 PAwOBA .262 → .216 (−46)K% 22.0% → 26.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.03%	÷1.003	×1.220	—	—	26.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.47%	÷1.055	×0.700	—	×0.978	5.50%
HBP% /PA	1.69%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	1.41%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷0.996	×0.970	—	×0.978	23.81%
Doubles /BIP	5.00%	÷1.204	×0.860	—	×0.978	3.49%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.140	×0.950	—	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.979	×0.780	—	×0.978	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 99, 2B 141, 3B 128, K 101, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .262 → .216; ISO .038 → .026; BABIP .300 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAScranton/Wilkes-Barre RailRiders · 25 PAwOBA .302 → .275 (−26)K% 12.0% → 14.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.00%	÷1.010	×1.200	—	—	14.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.00%	÷1.015	×0.690	—	×1.003	5.45%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	35.00%	÷0.971	×0.930	—	×1.003	33.61%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.026	×0.830	—	×1.003	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.970	—	×1.003	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.976	×0.840	—	×1.003	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 94, 2B 105, 3B 100, K 102, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .302 → .275; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .350 → .336. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AATrenton Thunder · 284 PAwOBA .271 → .241 (−30)K% 16.9% → 20.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.90%	÷0.990	×1.220	—	—	20.83%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.10%	÷0.955	×0.700	—	×0.988	5.86%
HBP% /PA	1.06%	—	×0.850	—	×0.988	0.89%
Singles /BIP	17.50%	÷0.980	×0.970	×1.023	×0.988	17.49%
Doubles /BIP	6.00%	÷1.058	×0.860	×1.023	×0.988	4.93%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.950	×1.023	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.00%	÷0.975	×0.780	—	×0.988	2.37%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 96, 2B 112, 3B 80, K 98, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.023.

Result: wOBA .271 → .241; ISO .121 → .100; BABIP .237 → .225. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AATrenton Thunder · 290 PAwOBA .325 → .292 (−33)K% 13.8% → 17.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.79%	÷0.965	×1.220	—	—	17.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.38%	÷1.039	×0.700	—	×0.998	7.65%
HBP% /PA	1.03%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	0.88%
Singles /BIP	19.14%	÷0.982	×0.970	×1.015	×0.998	19.16%
Doubles /BIP	8.13%	÷1.017	×0.860	×1.015	×0.998	6.97%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.015	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.87%	÷0.809	×0.780	—	×0.998	2.76%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 62, 1B 96, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 93, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.

Result: wOBA .325 → .292; ISO .141 → .132; BABIP .277 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAScranton/Wilkes-Barre Yankees · 17 PAwOBA .229 → .223 (−5)K% 23.5% → 28.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.53%	÷0.990	×1.200	—	—	28.52%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.00%	÷1.005	×0.690	—	×1.033	0.00%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷0.976	×0.930	—	×1.033	24.61%
Doubles /BIP	8.33%	÷0.931	×0.830	—	×1.033	7.68%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.113	×0.970	—	×1.033	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.965	×0.840	—	×1.033	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 95, 2B 86, 3B 123, K 98, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .229 → .223; ISO .062 → .058; BABIP .333 → .323. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 A+Tampa Yankees · 156 PAwOBA .306 → .258 (−47)K% 19.9% → 28.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.87%	÷0.996	×1.420	—	—	28.32%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.41%	÷1.094	×0.750	—	×0.988	4.34%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	1.18%
Singles /BIP	24.55%	÷1.012	×0.920	×1.022	×0.988	22.53%
Doubles /BIP	3.64%	÷0.932	×0.960	×1.022	×0.988	3.78%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.022	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.55%	÷0.965	×0.880	—	×0.988	4.10%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 102, 2B 86, 3B 130, K 99, BB 119 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .306 → .258; ISO .135 → .118; BABIP .292 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .