Héctor Gómez

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1988-03-05

Age (2027)39

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2021

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR
2019	31	INTLTigres de Ara…	67	.213/.273/.295	0	2	59	—
2020	32	INTLPanama	28	.259/.286/.370	0	0	84	—
2021	33	INTLVenados de Ma…	79	.203/.253/.311	1	1	59	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Scouting grades · 20-80

Power39Speed63Eye22

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2006	18	ROK	Casper Rockies	—	221	202	66	9	4	5	11	26	3	5	3	327	370	485	856	158	349	12	5	370	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	19	A	Asheville Tourists	—	578	534	142	34	8	11	29	120	5	20	10	266	309	421	730	155	323	21	5	318	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+	Modesto Nuts	—	368	338	93	21	4	7	15	68	5	10	4	275	316	423	739	148	320	18	4	319	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA	Tulsa Drillers	—	35	35	11	4	0	0	0	8	0	0	0	314	314	429	743	114	407	23	0	328	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA	Tulsa Drillers	—	453	425	100	23	6	14	19	94	3	16	4	235	273	416	689	181	270	21	4	299	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	INTL	Toros del Este	—	37	37	8	3	0	0	0	9	0	1	0	216	216	297	514	81	286	24	0	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+	Brevard County Manatees	—	95	84	11	3	2	1	6	23	3	1	0	131	215	250	465	119	164	24	6	211	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	INTL	Toros del Este	—	55	49	12	6	0	0	5	15	0	1	0	245	315	367	682	122	353	27	9	302	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA	Huntsville Stars	—	406	368	72	12	2	2	18	77	3	6	9	196	239	255	495	60	241	19	4	217	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	INTL	Dominican Republic	—	158	151	42	5	2	4	4	32	3	3	2	278	310	417	727	139	330	20	3	323	105	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	MLB	Milwaukee Brewers	—	21	20	3	1	0	0	1	9	0	0	0	150	190	200	390	50	273	43	5	181	12	-2	+0	-0	+7	+0	0.5
2014	26	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	442	408	115	25	6	15	21	80	7	5	3	282	328	483	811	201	315	18	5	351	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	INTL	Dominican Republic	—	146	131	31	9	1	2	10	32	3	4	0	237	306	366	672	130	293	22	7	299	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	MLB	Milwaukee Brewers	—	134	127	23	11	2	1	3	40	2	0	0	181	212	323	535	142	256	30	2	232	48	-8	+0	-0	+1	+3	-0.5
2015	27	AAA	El Paso Chihuahuas	—	115	106	38	11	4	3	7	17	1	2	0	358	404	623	1.026	264	402	15	6	440	123	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	INTL	Toros del Este	—	51	43	9	2	0	0	6	2	1	2	0	209	320	256	576	47	214	4	12	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	INTL	Toros del Este	—	53	48	11	4	0	0	5	11	0	0	0	229	302	312	614	83	297	21	9	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	223	212	50	15	2	7	7	44	1	0	1	236	264	425	688	189	262	20	3	297	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	INTL	Dominican Republic	—	164	149	39	10	0	2	14	27	1	2	0	262	329	369	698	107	308	16	9	317	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	INTL	Estrellas Orientales	—	101	92	17	4	0	2	7	17	2	0	1	185	257	293	551	109	205	17	7	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	INTL	Tigres de Aragua	—	67	61	13	5	0	0	5	7	0	2	0	213	273	295	568	82	236	10	7	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	32	INTL	Panama	—	28	27	7	3	0	0	1	7	0	0	0	259	286	370	656	111	350	25	4	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	INTL	Venados de Mazatlan	—	79	74	15	3	1	1	3	17	2	1	0	203	253	311	564	108	250	22	4	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	155	147	26	12	2	1	4	49	2	0	0	177	209	306	515	129	258	32	3	225	39	-11	+0	-1	+8	+3	-0.1
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2006	18	ROK MLE	Casper Rockies	—	221	207	55	7	3	4	6	37	3	5	3	266	296	386	683	121	289	17	3	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	19	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	578	545	125	28	7	9	20	161	5	20	10	229	263	356	619	127	300	28	3	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ MLE	Modesto Nuts	—	368	343	81	17	3	6	10	91	5	10	4	236	268	356	624	120	284	25	3	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	35	35	11	4	0	0	0	10	0	0	0	314	314	429	743	114	407	29	0	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	453	431	92	20	6	10	13	116	3	16	4	213	242	357	599	144	264	26	3	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	Brevard County Manatees	—	95	86	10	3	2	1	4	33	3	1	0	116	183	233	415	116	152	35	4	173	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	Huntsville Stars	—	406	374	66	11	2	2	12	96	3	6	9	176	208	233	441	56	217	24	3	185	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	MLB MLE	Milwaukee Brewers	—	21	20	3	1	0	0	1	9	0	0	0	150	190	200	390	50	273	43	5	185	12	-2	+0	-0	+7	+0	0.5
2014	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	442	415	96	18	5	13	14	107	7	5	3	231	268	393	661	161	271	24	3	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	MLB MLE	Milwaukee Brewers	—	134	127	24	12	2	1	3	40	2	0	0	189	220	339	558	150	256	30	2	240	48	-8	+0	-0	+1	+3	-0.5
2015	27	AAA MLE	El Paso Chihuahuas	—	115	109	32	9	3	3	4	22	1	2	0	294	325	514	838	220	337	19	3	350	123	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	223	214	41	12	2	5	5	55	1	0	1	192	214	336	550	145	223	25	2	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	18	ROK MLE	Casper Rockies	—	221	207	55	7	3	4	6	37	3	5	3	266	296	386	683	121	300	17	3	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	18	ROK RAW	Casper Rockies	—	221	202	66	9	4	5	11	26	3	5	3	327	370	485	856	158	349	12	5	370	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	19	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	578	545	125	28	7	9	20	161	5	20	10	229	263	356	619	127	308	28	3	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	19	A RAW	Asheville Tourists	—	578	534	142	34	8	11	29	120	5	20	10	266	309	421	730	155	323	21	5	318	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ MLE	Modesto Nuts	—	368	343	81	17	3	6	10	91	5	10	4	236	268	356	624	120	298	25	3	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ RAW	Modesto Nuts	—	368	338	93	21	4	7	15	68	5	10	4	275	316	423	739	148	320	18	4	319	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	35	35	11	4	0	0	0	10	0	0	0	314	314	429	743	114	440	29	0	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA RAW	Tulsa Drillers	—	35	35	11	4	0	0	0	8	0	0	0	314	314	429	743	114	407	23	0	328	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	490	467	100	22	6	11	14	125	3	17	4	214	242	358	599	143	268	26	3	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	490	462	108	26	6	14	19	103	3	17	4	234	269	407	676	173	272	21	4	293	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	150	137	14	4	3	1	7	52	3	2	0	102	163	197	360	95	153	35	5	173	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	150	133	23	9	2	1	11	38	3	2	0	173	252	293	545	120	232	25	7	245	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	564	524	91	15	3	2	17	134	6	9	11	174	208	225	434	52	229	24	3	185	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	564	519	114	17	4	6	22	109	6	9	11	220	260	303	562	83	267	19	4	247	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	609	572	130	25	6	17	19	153	10	9	3	227	265	381	646	154	277	25	3	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	609	559	149	35	7	17	32	121	10	9	3	267	318	445	763	179	309	20	5	333	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	MLB MLE	3 teams	—	300	284	67	25	6	4	8	75	4	4	0	236	267	408	675	173	304	25	3	291	83	-6	+1	-0	+1	+6	0.2
2015	27	MLB RAW	3 teams	—	300	276	70	24	6	4	16	59	4	4	0	254	304	428	732	174	307	20	5	318	83	-6	+1	-0	+1	+6	0.2
2016	28	INTL MLE	Toros del Este	—	53	48	11	4	0	0	5	11	0	0	0	229	302	312	614	83	297	21	9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	28	INTL RAW	Toros del Este	—	53	48	11	4	0	0	5	11	0	0	0	229	302	312	614	83	297	21	9	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	387	374	71	21	3	9	8	95	2	2	1	190	211	334	545	144	227	25	2	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	387	361	89	25	2	9	21	71	2	2	1	247	292	402	693	155	282	18	5	305	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	INTL MLE	Estrellas Orientales	—	101	92	17	4	0	2	7	17	2	0	1	185	257	293	551	109	205	17	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	30	INTL RAW	Estrellas Orientales	—	101	92	17	4	0	2	7	17	2	0	1	185	257	293	551	109	205	17	7	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	INTL MLE	Tigres de Aragua	—	67	61	13	5	0	0	5	7	0	2	0	213	273	295	568	82	236	10	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	31	INTL RAW	Tigres de Aragua	—	67	61	13	5	0	0	5	7	0	2	0	213	273	295	568	82	236	10	7	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	32	INTL MLE	Panama	—	28	27	7	3	0	0	1	7	0	0	0	259	286	370	656	111	350	25	4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	32	INTL RAW	Panama	—	28	27	7	3	0	0	1	7	0	0	0	259	286	370	656	111	350	25	4	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	INTL MLE	Venados de Mazatlan	—	79	74	15	3	1	1	3	17	2	1	0	203	253	311	564	108	250	22	4	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	33	INTL RAW	Venados de Mazatlan	—	79	74	15	3	1	1	3	17	2	1	0	203	253	311	564	108	250	22	4	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	18	ROK MLE	Casper Rockies	—	221	210	55	7	3	4	6	37	3	5	3	262	296	381	677	119	289	17	3	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	19	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	578	548	125	28	7	9	20	161	5	20	10	228	263	354	617	126	300	28	3	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	21	A+ MLE	Modesto Nuts	—	368	350	81	17	3	6	10	91	5	10	4	231	268	349	617	117	284	25	3	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	22	AA MLE	Tulsa Drillers	—	35	35	11	4	0	0	0	10	0	0	0	314	314	429	743	114	407	29	0	292	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	490	470	100	22	6	11	14	125	3	17	4	213	242	355	597	143	264	26	3	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	150	139	14	4	3	1	7	52	3	2	0	101	163	194	358	94	152	35	5	173	3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	564	536	91	15	3	2	17	134	6	9	11	170	208	220	429	50	217	24	3	185	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	609	575	130	25	6	17	19	153	10	9	3	226	265	379	644	153	271	25	3	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	27	MLB MLE	3 teams	—	300	285	67	25	6	4	8	75	4	4	0	235	267	407	674	172	293	25	3	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	387	374	71	21	3	9	8	95	2	2	1	190	211	334	545	144	223	25	2	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	155	147	26	12	2	1	4	49	2	0	0	177	209	306	515	129	258	32	3	225	42	-11	+0	-1	+8	+3	-0.1
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	616	108	50	8	4	17	205	8	0	0	175	207	302	509	127	256	32	3	225	42	-47	+0	-3	+32	+14	-0.5
Career	—	MLE		—	4030	3790	808	187	41	66	130	992	45	81	37	213	248	336	584	123	269	25	3	230	42	-11	+0	-1	+8	+3	-0.1
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	611	131	30	7	11	21	160	7	13	6	214	248	340	589	126	270	25	3	230	42	-47	+0	-3	+32	+14	-0.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 223 PAwOBA .292 → .235 (−57)K% 19.7% → 24.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.73%	÷0.961	×1.200	—	—	24.63%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.14%	÷1.014	×0.690	—	×0.982	2.10%
HBP% /PA	0.45%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	0.41%
Singles /BIP	15.48%	÷1.055	×0.930	×0.997	×0.982	13.36%
Doubles /BIP	8.93%	÷0.969	×0.830	×0.997	×0.982	7.49%
Triples /BIP	1.19%	÷1.047	×0.970	×0.997	×0.982	1.08%
Home runs /BIP	4.17%	÷1.043	×0.840	—	×0.982	3.30%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 111, 2B 94, 3B 109, K 92, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.

Result: wOBA .292 → .235; ISO .189 → .150; BABIP .262 → .223. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 115 PAwOBA .426 → .350 (−77)K% 14.8% → 19.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.78%	÷0.980	×1.290	—	—	19.47%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.35%	÷0.972	×0.710	—	×1.003	3.19%
HBP% /PA	0.87%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.85%
Singles /BIP	22.47%	÷1.017	×0.900	×0.991	×1.003	19.76%
Doubles /BIP	12.36%	÷0.970	×0.810	×0.991	×1.003	10.25%
Triples /BIP	4.49%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.991	×1.003	3.15%
Home runs /BIP	3.37%	÷0.919	×0.780	—	×1.003	2.87%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 103, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 96, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.991.

Result: wOBA .426 → .350; ISO .264 → .209; BABIP .402 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAANashville Sounds · 442 PAwOBA .344 → .282 (−61)K% 18.1% → 24.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.10%	÷0.964	×1.290	—	—	24.22%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.52%	÷1.040	×0.710	—	×1.018	3.14%
HBP% /PA	1.58%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	1.58%
Singles /BIP	21.04%	÷0.975	×0.900	×0.968	×1.018	19.13%
Doubles /BIP	7.62%	÷1.051	×0.810	×0.968	×1.018	5.79%
Triples /BIP	1.83%	÷1.018	×0.810	×0.968	×1.018	1.43%
Home runs /BIP	4.57%	÷0.875	×0.780	—	×1.018	4.15%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 95, 2B 110, 3B 104, K 93, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.968.

Result: wOBA .344 → .282; ISO .201 → .162; BABIP .315 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAHuntsville Stars · 406 PAwOBA .212 → .185 (−27)K% 19.0% → 23.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.97%	÷0.977	×1.220	—	—	23.68%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.43%	÷1.001	×0.680	—	×0.998	3.00%
HBP% /PA	0.74%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	0.62%
Singles /BIP	19.24%	÷1.029	×0.920	×1.004	×0.998	17.23%
Doubles /BIP	4.12%	÷1.007	×0.910	×1.004	×0.998	3.73%
Triples /BIP	0.69%	÷0.900	×0.880	×1.004	×0.998	0.67%
Home runs /BIP	0.69%	÷1.040	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.53%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 106, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 95, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.

Result: wOBA .212 → .185; ISO .060 → .053; BABIP .241 → .217. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Brevard County Manatees · 95 PAwOBA .208 → .173 (−36)K% 24.2% → 34.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.21%	÷0.999	×1.420	—	—	34.40%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.32%	÷1.061	×0.750	—	×0.988	4.41%
HBP% /PA	3.16%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	2.90%
Singles /BIP	8.20%	÷1.032	×0.920	×1.016	×0.988	7.33%
Doubles /BIP	4.92%	÷0.969	×0.960	×1.016	×0.988	4.89%
Triples /BIP	3.28%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.016	×0.988	2.96%
Home runs /BIP	1.64%	÷0.863	×0.880	—	×0.988	1.65%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 106, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 100, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.016.

Result: wOBA .208 → .173; ISO .119 → .104; BABIP .164 → .152. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AATulsa Drillers · 453 PAwOBA .290 → .256 (−34)K% 20.8% → 25.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.75%	÷0.992	×1.220	—	—	25.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.97%	÷0.992	×0.700	—	×1.027	2.88%
HBP% /PA	0.66%	—	×0.870	—	×1.027	0.59%
Singles /BIP	17.22%	÷0.935	×0.920	×1.006	×1.027	17.52%
Doubles /BIP	6.95%	÷0.949	×0.840	×1.006	×1.027	6.35%
Triples /BIP	1.81%	÷1.029	×0.940	×1.006	×1.027	1.71%
Home runs /BIP	4.23%	÷1.071	×0.800	—	×1.027	3.24%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 114, 1B 87, 2B 90, 3B 106, K 98, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.

Result: wOBA .290 → .256; ISO .181 → .148; BABIP .270 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AATulsa Drillers · 35 PAwOBA .318 → .292 (−26)K% 22.9% → 28.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.86%	÷0.965	×1.220	—	—	28.90%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.00%	÷1.045	×0.700	—	×1.042	0.00%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.870	—	×1.042	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.93%	÷0.940	×0.920	—	×1.042	26.43%
Doubles /BIP	14.81%	÷0.907	×0.840	—	×1.042	14.30%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	—	×1.042	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.131	×0.800	—	×1.042	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 88, 2B 81, 3B 130, K 93, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .318 → .292; ISO .114 → .102; BABIP .407 → .407. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 A+Modesto Nuts · 368 PAwOBA .314 → .268 (−47)K% 18.5% → 24.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.48%	÷1.000	×1.340	—	—	24.76%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.80%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.027	2.77%
HBP% /PA	1.36%	—	×0.790	—	×1.027	1.10%
Singles /BIP	22.59%	÷1.000	×0.910	×0.983	×1.027	20.76%
Doubles /BIP	7.78%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.983	×1.027	6.44%
Triples /BIP	1.48%	÷1.000	×0.760	×0.983	×1.027	1.14%
Home runs /BIP	2.59%	÷1.000	×0.920	—	×1.027	2.45%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.

Result: wOBA .314 → .268; ISO .148 → .125; BABIP .320 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .