Sharlon Schoop

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1987-04-15

Age (2027)40

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2023

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2018	31	AAA/AA2 orgs	123	.221/.317/.327	2	49	—	.203/.275/.296
2022	35	INTLCuracao	29	.417/.517/.417	0	179	—
2023	36	INTLCuracao	18	.214/.353/.214	0	67	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	18	ROK	AZL Giants	—	196	169	43	4	0	1	14	18	5	10	4	254	330	296	626	41	278	9	7	281	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	ROK	AZL Giants	—	160	126	39	7	1	1	26	15	4	8	3	310	442	405	847	95	339	9	16	381	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A	Augusta GreenJackets	—	148	136	32	6	0	1	8	32	2	4	3	235	288	301	589	66	298	22	5	267	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+	San Jose Giants	—	450	398	98	18	1	7	35	88	2	7	3	246	310	349	660	103	294	20	8	290	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA	Connecticut Defenders	—	352	320	77	15	0	3	20	63	5	6	5	241	296	316	611	75	289	18	6	274	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	199	183	50	9	0	2	13	34	0	1	1	273	321	355	677	82	322	17	7	302	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A	Augusta GreenJackets	—	98	89	25	2	1	0	7	20	1	3	2	281	340	326	666	45	357	20	7	303	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	231	206	45	8	0	4	20	39	1	3	2	218	291	316	606	97	248	17	9	273	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA	Northwest Arkansas Naturals	—	186	165	44	7	0	7	17	41	2	2	1	267	342	436	779	170	314	22	9	344	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	298	267	58	13	0	3	24	56	3	0	3	217	289	300	589	82	263	19	8	268	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	184	166	36	3	0	1	15	34	0	1	0	217	282	253	535	36	265	18	8	247	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	94	85	19	5	0	0	7	17	0	0	0	224	280	282	562	59	275	18	7	255	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	183	165	39	6	1	4	13	40	1	0	1	236	291	358	649	121	289	22	7	288	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	162	140	30	6	2	1	16	31	1	0	1	214	297	307	605	93	266	19	10	271	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	30	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	95	88	17	6	0	5	5	19	2	0	0	193	253	432	684	239	188	20	5	300	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	30	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	26	23	8	0	1	0	3	3	0	0	0	348	423	435	858	87	400	12	12	386	107	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	31	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	98	86	18	5	0	1	7	22	2	0	2	209	281	302	584	93	266	22	7	262	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	31	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	25	18	5	0	0	1	5	7	1	0	1	278	458	444	903	167	400	28	20	397	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	35	INTL	Curacao	—	29	24	10	0	0	0	5	2	0	0	0	417	517	417	934		455	7	17	432	179	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	36	INTL	Curacao	—	18	14	3	0	0	0	3	3	0	0	0	214	353	214	567		250	17	17	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	18	ROK MLE	AZL Giants	—	196	174	38	3	0	1	9	26	5	10	4	218	277	253	529	34	232	13	5	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	ROK MLE	AZL Giants	—	160	137	36	6	1	1	15	22	4	8	3	263	353	343	696	80	285	14	9	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	—	148	139	30	5	0	1	5	43	2	4	3	216	253	273	527	58	290	29	3	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	450	407	93	16	1	7	26	118	2	7	3	229	278	324	602	96	281	26	6	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA MLE	Connecticut Defenders	—	352	326	78	14	0	2	14	77	5	6	5	239	281	301	582	61	298	22	4	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	199	188	49	8	0	2	8	42	0	1	1	261	291	335	626	74	321	21	4	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	—	98	92	24	2	1	0	4	25	1	3	2	261	299	304	603	43	341	26	4	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	231	214	42	7	0	3	12	49	1	3	2	196	242	271	513	75	230	21	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	Northwest Arkansas Naturals	—	186	169	38	7	0	5	13	51	2	2	1	225	288	355	643	130	283	27	7	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	298	276	57	12	0	2	15	70	3	0	3	207	255	272	527	65	262	23	5	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	184	172	35	3	0	1	9	43	0	1	0	203	243	238	481	35	253	23	5	210	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	94	88	17	4	0	0	5	21	0	0	0	193	237	239	475	45	247	22	5	213	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	183	173	36	5	1	4	8	49	1	0	1	208	247	318	565	110	265	27	4	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	162	147	29	5	2	1	10	38	1	0	1	197	253	279	532	82	250	23	6	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	30	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	95	89	16	5	0	5	4	23	2	0	0	180	232	404	636	225	169	24	4	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	30	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	26	24	8	0	1	0	2	4	0	0	0	333	385	417	801	83	368	15	8	327	107	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	31	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	98	89	17	4	0	1	5	26	2	0	2	191	250	270	520	79	240	27	5	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	31	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	25	20	5	0	0	1	3	9	1	0	1	250	375	400	775	150	355	36	12	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	18	ROK MLE	AZL Giants	—	196	174	38	3	0	1	9	26	5	10	4	218	277	253	529	34	250	13	5	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	18	ROK RAW	AZL Giants	—	196	169	43	4	0	1	14	18	5	10	4	254	330	296	626	41	278	9	7	281	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	ROK MLE	AZL Giants	—	160	137	36	6	1	1	15	22	4	8	3	263	353	343	696	80	302	14	9	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	ROK RAW	AZL Giants	—	160	126	39	7	1	1	26	15	4	8	3	310	442	405	847	95	339	9	16	381	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	—	148	139	30	5	0	1	5	43	2	4	3	216	253	273	527	58	302	29	3	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A RAW	Augusta GreenJackets	—	148	136	32	6	0	1	8	32	2	4	3	235	288	301	589	66	298	22	5	267	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	450	407	93	16	1	7	26	118	2	7	3	229	278	324	602	96	298	26	6	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ RAW	San Jose Giants	—	450	398	98	18	1	7	35	88	2	7	3	246	310	349	660	103	294	20	8	290	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA MLE	Connecticut Defenders	—	352	326	78	14	0	2	14	77	5	6	5	239	281	301	582	61	305	22	4	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA RAW	Connecticut Defenders	—	352	320	77	15	0	3	20	63	5	6	5	241	296	316	611	75	289	18	6	274	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	297	280	73	10	1	2	12	67	1	4	3	261	294	325	619	64	332	23	4	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	297	272	75	11	1	2	20	54	1	4	3	276	328	346	673	70	333	18	7	302	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	231	214	42	7	0	3	12	49	1	3	2	196	242	271	513	75	238	21	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA RAW	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	231	206	45	8	0	4	20	39	1	3	2	218	291	316	606	97	248	17	9	273	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	Northwest Arkansas Naturals	—	186	169	38	7	0	5	13	51	2	2	1	225	288	355	643	130	289	27	7	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA RAW	Northwest Arkansas Naturals	—	186	165	44	7	0	7	17	41	2	2	1	267	342	436	779	170	314	22	9	344	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	298	276	57	12	0	2	15	70	3	0	3	207	255	272	527	65	268	23	5	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA RAW	Bowie Baysox	—	298	267	58	13	0	3	24	56	3	0	3	217	289	300	589	82	263	19	8	268	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	278	260	52	7	0	1	14	63	0	1	0	200	241	238	479	38	258	23	5	211	29	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	278	251	55	8	0	1	22	51	0	1	0	219	281	263	544	44	269	18	8	249	29	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	345	320	65	10	3	5	18	87	2	0	2	203	250	300	550	97	262	25	5	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	345	305	69	12	3	5	29	71	2	0	2	226	294	334	629	108	278	21	8	280	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	121	114	23	5	1	5	5	27	2	0	0	202	248	395	643	193	220	22	4	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	30	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	121	111	25	6	1	5	8	22	2	0	0	225	289	432	722	207	238	18	7	319	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	123	109	22	4	0	2	8	35	3	0	3	202	275	294	569	92	274	28	7	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	31	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	123	104	23	5	0	2	12	29	3	0	3	221	317	327	644	106	284	24	10	290	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	35	INTL MLE	Curacao	—	29	24	10	0	0	0	5	2	0	0	0	417	517	417	934		455	7	17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	35	INTL RAW	Curacao	—	29	24	10	0	0	0	5	2	0	0	0	417	517	417	934		455	7	17	432	179	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	36	INTL MLE	Curacao	—	18	14	3	0	0	0	3	3	0	0	0	214	353	214	567		250	17	17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	36	INTL RAW	Curacao	—	18	14	3	0	0	0	3	3	0	0	0	214	353	214	567		250	17	17	267	67	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	18	ROK MLE	AZL Giants	—	196	180	38	3	0	1	9	26	5	10	4	211	277	244	521	33	232	13	5	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	19	ROK MLE	AZL Giants	—	160	140	36	6	1	1	15	22	4	8	3	257	353	336	688	79	285	14	9	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	20	A MLE	Augusta GreenJackets	—	148	140	30	5	0	1	5	43	2	4	3	214	253	271	525	57	290	29	3	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	21	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	450	419	93	16	1	7	26	118	2	7	3	222	278	315	593	93	281	26	6	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	AA MLE	Connecticut Defenders	—	352	330	78	14	0	2	14	77	5	6	5	236	281	297	578	61	298	22	4	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	297	282	73	10	1	2	12	67	1	4	3	259	294	323	616	64	328	23	4	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Richmond Flying Squirrels	—	231	216	42	7	0	3	12	49	1	3	2	194	242	269	511	74	230	21	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	Northwest Arkansas Naturals	—	186	169	38	7	0	5	13	51	2	2	1	225	288	355	643	130	283	27	7	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	298	278	57	12	0	2	15	70	3	0	3	205	255	270	525	65	262	23	5	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	278	262	52	7	0	1	14	63	0	1	0	198	241	237	478	38	251	23	5	211	29	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	345	322	65	10	3	5	18	87	2	0	2	202	250	298	548	96	258	25	5	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	121	113	23	5	1	5	5	27	2	0	0	204	248	398	646	195	212	22	4	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	123	111	22	4	0	2	8	35	3	0	3	198	275	288	563	90	263	28	7	241	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	3232	2963	660	106	7	37	174	740	32	45	32	223	273	301	574	78	282	23	5	245	52	-185	-4	+0	+35	+70	-8.5
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	596	132	21	1	7	35	149	6	9	6	221	272	295	567	74	281	23	5	245	52	-37	-1	+0	+7	+14	-1.7

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2018 AAANorfolk Tides · 98 PAwOBA .258 → .222 (−36)K% 22.4% → 26.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.45%	÷1.009	×1.200	—	—	26.70%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.14%	÷0.997	×0.690	—	×0.962	4.76%
HBP% /PA	2.04%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	1.85%
Singles /BIP	18.75%	÷0.984	×0.930	×1.050	×0.962	17.90%
Doubles /BIP	7.81%	÷1.063	×0.830	×1.050	×0.962	6.16%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.050	×0.962	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.56%	÷0.964	×0.840	—	×0.962	1.31%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 97, 2B 113, 3B 130, K 102, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .258 → .222; ISO .093 → .077; BABIP .266 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AABowie Baysox · 25 PAwOBA .388 → .316 (−72)K% 28.0% → 35.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.00%	÷0.960	×1.220	—	—	35.58%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	20.00%	÷0.978	×0.700	—	×0.940	13.45%
HBP% /PA	4.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.940	3.20%
Singles /BIP	36.36%	÷0.996	×0.970	—	×0.940	33.28%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.971	×0.860	—	×0.940	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.950	—	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	9.09%	÷1.060	×0.780	—	×0.940	6.29%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 99, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 92, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 24.8 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .388 → .316; ISO .167 → .125; BABIP .400 → .355. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAANorfolk Tides · 95 PAwOBA .291 → .252 (−40)K% 20.0% → 24.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.00%	÷0.995	×1.200	—	—	24.13%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.26%	÷0.948	×0.690	—	×0.972	3.72%
HBP% /PA	2.11%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	1.92%
Singles /BIP	8.70%	÷0.989	×0.930	×1.050	×0.972	8.34%
Doubles /BIP	8.70%	÷1.001	×0.830	×1.050	×0.972	7.36%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.050	×0.972	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.25%	÷0.866	×0.840	—	×0.972	6.83%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 98, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 99, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .291 → .252; ISO .239 → .211; BABIP .188 → .169. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AABowie Baysox · 26 PAwOBA .377 → .327 (−50)K% 11.5% → 14.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.54%	÷0.970	×1.220	—	—	14.51%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.54%	÷1.061	×0.700	—	×0.948	7.22%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.948	0.00%
Singles /BIP	35.00%	÷0.993	×0.970	—	×0.948	32.40%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.043	×0.860	—	×0.948	0.00%
Triples /BIP	5.00%	÷1.016	×0.950	—	×0.948	4.43%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.998	×0.780	—	×0.948	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 99, 2B 109, 3B 103, K 94, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 24.8 → −5.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .377 → .327; ISO .087 → .078; BABIP .400 → .368. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAANorfolk Tides · 183 PAwOBA .281 → .249 (−32)K% 21.9% → 26.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.86%	÷0.983	×1.200	—	—	26.67%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.10%	÷1.046	×0.690	—	×0.982	4.60%
HBP% /PA	0.55%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	0.50%
Singles /BIP	22.40%	÷1.027	×0.930	×1.050	×0.982	20.92%
Doubles /BIP	4.80%	÷1.021	×0.830	×1.050	×0.982	4.02%
Triples /BIP	0.80%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.050	×0.982	0.70%
Home runs /BIP	3.20%	÷0.776	×0.840	—	×0.982	3.40%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 55, 1B 105, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 97, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .281 → .249; ISO .121 → .118; BABIP .289 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AABowie Baysox · 162 PAwOBA .266 → .231 (−35)K% 19.1% → 23.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.14%	÷0.984	×1.220	—	—	23.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.88%	÷1.084	×0.700	—	×0.958	6.11%
HBP% /PA	0.62%	—	×0.850	—	×0.958	0.50%
Singles /BIP	19.27%	÷0.992	×0.970	×1.036	×0.958	18.70%
Doubles /BIP	5.50%	÷1.053	×0.860	×1.036	×0.958	4.46%
Triples /BIP	1.83%	÷0.900	×0.950	×1.036	×0.958	1.92%
Home runs /BIP	0.92%	÷1.057	×0.780	—	×0.958	0.65%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 111, 1B 98, 2B 111, 3B 80, K 97, BB 117 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 24.8 → −4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.

Result: wOBA .266 → .231; ISO .093 → .083; BABIP .266 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAANorfolk Tides · 184 PAwOBA .239 → .210 (−29)K% 18.5% → 23.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.48%	÷0.961	×1.200	—	—	23.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.61%	÷1.060	×0.690	—	×0.992	4.91%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.00%
Singles /BIP	24.24%	÷0.989	×0.930	×1.032	×0.992	23.34%
Doubles /BIP	2.27%	÷0.979	×0.830	×1.032	×0.992	1.97%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.032	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.76%	÷1.097	×0.840	—	×0.992	0.58%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 98, 2B 96, 3B 130, K 92, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.

Result: wOBA .239 → .210; ISO .036 → .030; BABIP .265 → .253. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AABowie Baysox · 94 PAwOBA .251 → .213 (−38)K% 18.1% → 22.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.09%	÷0.989	×1.220	—	—	22.31%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.45%	÷1.014	×0.700	—	×0.968	4.97%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.59%	÷1.023	×0.970	×1.002	×0.968	18.94%
Doubles /BIP	7.35%	÷0.999	×0.860	×1.002	×0.968	6.14%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.123	×0.950	×1.002	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.197	×0.780	—	×0.968	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 139, 1B 105, 2B 100, 3B 125, K 98, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.002.

Result: wOBA .251 → .213; ISO .059 → .049; BABIP .275 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .