Gilberto Mejia

Pos2B

B/TS/R

Born1982-09-01

Age (2027)44

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2017

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2015	32	AAA/INTL2 orgs	535	.310/.392/.418	4	43	89	—	.264/.322/.366
2016	33	AAADelfines de C…	458	.265/.317/.351	3	30	53	—	.235/.273/.301
2017	34	AAABravos de Leon	191	.308/.400/.410	1	9	86	—	.274/.339/.366

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	22	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	239	211	40	2	2	3	19	56	3	2	1	190	266	261	527	71	243	23	8	240	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+	Lakeland Tigers	—	284	260	69	8	2	2	19	64	3	10	8	265	323	335	657	69	345	23	7	298	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+	Lakeland Tigers	—	528	455	113	19	7	5	55	88	5	25	14	248	336	354	690	105	295	17	10	307	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	500	424	113	15	9	3	64	78	1	51	18	267	364	366	730	99	319	16	13	326	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	INTL	Aguilas Cibaenas	—	26	23	7	0	0	1	2	5	0	5	1	304	360	435	795	130	353	19	8	343	118	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	507	427	126	18	7	6	56	90	7	36	10	295	386	412	798	117	358	18	11	349	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	160	141	40	5	2	1	9	30	2	5	5	284	336	369	704	85	355	19	6	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	499	439	132	29	5	4	33	79	13	49	13	301	367	417	784	116	359	16	7	343	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	INTL	Venados de Mazatlan	—	110	90	22	2	0	0	15	19	2	7	3	244	364	267	631	22	310	17	14	296	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	490	422	133	20	9	4	47	73	12	43	16	315	399	434	833	118	370	15	10	369	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	45	40	10	0	0	0	4	6	0	0	2	250	318	250	568		294	13	9	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	AAA	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	458	419	111	15	6	3	26	64	6	30	11	265	317	351	668	86	307	14	6	298	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	34	AAA	Bravos de Leon	—	191	156	48	7	3	1	22	23	2	9	5	308	400	410	810	103	348	12	12	347	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	22	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	239	217	41	2	2	2	13	68	3	2	1	189	245	244	489	55	252	28	5	217	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ MLE	Lakeland Tigers	—	284	265	60	7	2	2	14	91	3	10	8	226	273	291	564	64	333	32	5	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ MLE	Lakeland Tigers	—	528	471	106	19	6	4	39	125	5	25	14	225	291	316	608	91	280	24	7	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA MLE	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	500	450	107	12	9	2	38	90	1	51	18	238	299	318	616	80	284	18	8	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA MLE	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	507	444	126	16	7	5	39	98	7	36	10	284	351	385	736	101	333	19	8	314	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA MLE	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	499	454	122	24	4	3	18	91	13	49	13	269	315	359	674	90	317	18	4	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA MLE	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	490	443	117	18	9	3	26	83	12	43	16	264	322	366	688	102	311	17	5	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	AAA MLE	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	458	429	101	12	5	2	16	75	6	30	11	235	273	301	573	65	272	16	3	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	34	AAA MLE	Bravos de Leon	—	191	164	45	6	3	1	14	29	2	9	5	274	339	366	705	91	296	15	7	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	523	482	101	9	4	4	27	159	6	12	9	210	260	270	530	60	304	30	5	233	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	523	471	109	10	4	5	38	120	6	12	9	231	297	301	599	70	301	23	7	272	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ MLE	Lakeland Tigers	—	528	471	106	19	6	4	39	125	5	25	14	225	291	316	608	91	295	24	7	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ RAW	Lakeland Tigers	—	528	455	113	19	7	5	55	88	5	25	14	248	336	354	690	105	295	17	10	307	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	526	472	113	13	9	3	41	95	1	56	19	239	302	324	626	85	293	18	8	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	526	447	120	15	9	4	66	83	1	56	19	268	364	369	733	101	320	16	13	327	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	667	582	166	21	10	6	51	129	9	41	15	285	352	387	739	101	355	19	8	314	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	667	568	166	23	9	7	65	120	9	41	15	292	374	401	775	109	357	18	10	338	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	609	554	148	29	5	3	23	111	15	56	16	267	314	354	668	87	329	18	4	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	609	529	154	31	5	4	48	98	15	56	16	291	367	391	758	100	350	16	8	335	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	535	484	129	20	10	4	29	91	12	43	18	267	324	374	698	107	318	17	5	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	535	462	143	20	9	4	51	79	12	43	18	310	392	418	810	108	363	15	10	360	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	AAA MLE	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	458	429	101	12	5	2	16	75	6	30	11	235	273	301	573	65	281	16	3	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	AAA RAW	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	458	419	111	15	6	3	26	64	6	30	11	265	317	351	668	86	307	14	6	298	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	34	AAA MLE	Bravos de Leon	—	191	164	45	6	3	1	14	29	2	9	5	274	339	366	705	91	321	15	7	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	34	AAA RAW	Bravos de Leon	—	191	156	48	7	3	1	22	23	2	9	5	308	400	410	810	103	348	12	12	347	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	523	485	101	9	4	4	27	159	6	12	9	208	260	268	528	60	296	30	5	233	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ MLE	Lakeland Tigers	—	528	479	106	19	6	4	39	125	5	25	14	221	291	311	602	90	280	24	7	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	29	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	526	479	113	13	9	3	41	95	1	56	19	236	302	319	621	84	284	18	8	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	667	602	166	21	10	6	51	129	9	41	15	276	352	374	726	98	333	19	8	314	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	609	566	148	29	5	3	23	111	15	56	16	261	314	346	660	85	317	18	4	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	535	489	129	20	10	4	29	91	12	43	18	264	324	370	694	106	311	17	5	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	33	AAA MLE	Delfines de Ciudad del Carmen	—	458	433	101	12	5	2	16	75	6	30	11	233	273	298	571	65	272	16	3	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	34	AAA MLE	Bravos de Leon	—	191	173	45	6	3	1	14	29	2	9	5	260	339	347	686	87	296	15	7	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4037	3638	909	129	52	27	240	814	56	272	107	250	306	336	642	86	313	20	6	278	74	-123	+12	+0	+14	+87	-0.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	586	146	21	8	4	39	131	9	44	17	249	306	333	639	84	313	20	6	278	74	-20	+2	+0	+2	+14	-0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAABravos de Leon · 191 PAwOBA .342 → .295 (−47)K% 12.0% → 15.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.04%	÷0.942	×1.200	—	—	15.34%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.99%	÷0.968	×0.690	—	×0.940	7.36%
HBP% /PA	1.05%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.93%
Singles /BIP	27.82%	÷1.036	×0.930	×1.022	×0.940	23.99%
Doubles /BIP	5.26%	÷0.960	×0.830	×1.022	×0.940	4.37%
Triples /BIP	2.26%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.022	×0.940	1.73%
Home runs /BIP	0.75%	÷0.981	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.50%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 107, 2B 92, 3B 130, K 88, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 35 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .342 → .295; ISO .103 → .087; BABIP .348 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAADelfines de Ciudad del Carmen · 458 PAwOBA .289 → .247 (−42)K% 14.0% → 16.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.97%	÷1.030	×1.200	—	—	16.29%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.46%	÷1.018	×0.690	—	×0.940	3.48%
HBP% /PA	1.31%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	1.16%
Singles /BIP	24.51%	÷1.000	×0.930	×1.050	×0.940	22.51%
Doubles /BIP	4.23%	÷1.080	×0.830	×1.050	×0.940	3.20%
Triples /BIP	1.69%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.050	×0.940	1.33%
Home runs /BIP	0.85%	÷0.926	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.60%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 100, 2B 116, 3B 130, K 106, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 34 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .289 → .247; ISO .086 → .066; BABIP .307 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAADelfines de Ciudad del Carmen · 490 PAwOBA .361 → .303 (−58)K% 14.9% → 17.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.90%	÷1.049	×1.200	—	—	17.04%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.18%	÷1.102	×0.690	—	×0.942	5.42%
HBP% /PA	2.45%	—	×0.940	—	×0.942	2.17%
Singles /BIP	28.65%	÷1.095	×0.930	×1.031	×0.942	23.64%
Doubles /BIP	5.73%	÷0.934	×0.830	×1.031	×0.942	4.95%
Triples /BIP	2.58%	÷0.907	×0.920	×1.031	×0.942	2.54%
Home runs /BIP	1.15%	÷0.867	×0.700	—	×0.942	0.87%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 73, 1B 119, 2B 87, 3B 81, K 110, BB 120 — applied at half strength. Age: age 33 vs a level average of 27.2 → −5.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.

Result: wOBA .361 → .303; ISO .118 → .111; BABIP .370 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAADelfines de Ciudad del Carmen · 499 PAwOBA .332 → .289 (−43)K% 15.8% → 18.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.83%	÷1.036	×1.200	—	—	18.33%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.81%	÷1.021	×0.690	—	×0.952	3.74%
HBP% /PA	2.61%	—	×0.940	—	×0.952	2.33%
Singles /BIP	26.11%	÷0.978	×0.930	×1.020	×0.952	24.11%
Doubles /BIP	8.06%	÷1.015	×0.830	×1.020	×0.952	6.39%
Triples /BIP	1.39%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.020	×0.952	1.08%
Home runs /BIP	1.11%	÷1.079	×0.700	—	×0.952	0.69%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 116, 1B 96, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 107, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 32 vs a level average of 27.2 → −4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.

Result: wOBA .332 → .289; ISO .116 → .091; BABIP .359 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAADelfines de Ciudad del Carmen · 507 PAwOBA .343 → .314 (−30)K% 17.8% → 19.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.75%	÷1.102	×1.200	—	—	19.32%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.05%	÷0.969	×0.690	—	×0.962	7.57%
HBP% /PA	1.38%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	1.25%
Singles /BIP	28.19%	÷0.967	×0.930	×1.030	×0.962	26.87%
Doubles /BIP	5.34%	÷0.995	×0.830	×1.030	×0.962	4.42%
Triples /BIP	2.08%	÷0.950	×0.920	×1.030	×0.962	1.99%
Home runs /BIP	1.78%	÷0.949	×0.700	—	×0.962	1.26%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 93, 2B 99, 3B 90, K 120, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .343 → .314; ISO .117 → .104; BABIP .358 → .333. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAADelfines de Ciudad del Carmen · 500 PAwOBA .316 → .275 (−40)K% 15.6% → 18.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.60%	÷1.040	×1.200	—	—	18.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.60%	÷1.015	×0.690	—	×0.972	7.67%
HBP% /PA	0.20%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	0.18%
Singles /BIP	24.86%	÷1.017	×0.930	×1.026	×0.972	22.67%
Doubles /BIP	4.34%	÷1.073	×0.830	×1.026	×0.972	3.35%
Triples /BIP	2.60%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.026	×0.972	2.39%
Home runs /BIP	0.87%	÷0.889	×0.700	—	×0.972	0.66%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 103, 2B 114, 3B 100, K 108, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.

Result: wOBA .316 → .275; ISO .099 → .088; BABIP .319 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2006 A+Lakeland Tigers · 528 PAwOBA .300 → .265 (−35)K% 16.7% → 23.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.67%	÷1.000	×1.420	—	—	23.67%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.85%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.988	7.30%
HBP% /PA	0.95%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	0.87%
Singles /BIP	22.34%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.047	×0.988	21.27%
Doubles /BIP	5.18%	÷1.000	×0.960	×1.047	×0.988	5.14%
Triples /BIP	1.91%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.047	×0.988	1.60%
Home runs /BIP	1.36%	÷1.000	×0.880	—	×0.988	1.18%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.

Result: wOBA .300 → .265; ISO .105 → .094; BABIP .295 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2005 A+Lakeland Tigers · 284 PAwOBA .291 → .246 (−45)K% 22.5% → 32.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.54%	÷1.000	×1.420	—	—	32.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.69%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.998	5.01%
HBP% /PA	1.06%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	0.98%
Singles /BIP	29.08%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.050	×0.998	28.04%
Doubles /BIP	4.08%	÷1.000	×0.960	×1.050	×0.998	4.11%
Triples /BIP	1.02%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.050	×0.998	0.87%
Home runs /BIP	1.02%	÷1.000	×0.880	—	×0.998	0.90%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .291 → .246; ISO .069 → .058; BABIP .345 → .333. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .