Ben Guez

PosRF

B/TR/R

Born1987-01-24

Age (2027)40

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	27	AAADET	462	.230/.321/.423	16	7	66	—	.189/.262/.355
2015	28	AAA/INTL2 orgs	210	.288/.394/.497	9	8	104	—	.205/.302/.361
2016	29	AAAColorado Spri…	50	.171/.306/.317	1	3	6	—	.116/.224/.233

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2009	22	A	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	438	404	111	34	7	12	18	95	10	11	4	275	322	483	804	208	330	22	4	348	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	259	223	56	9	3	9	24	63	7	5	6	251	343	439	782	188	305	24	9	342	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	32	28	10	3	0	0	3	5	0	3	2	357	419	464	884	107	435	16	9	384	114	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	102	87	18	7	0	1	10	23	5	6	2	207	324	322	645	115	270	23	10	302	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	INTL	Surprise Rafters	—	63	57	13	2	1	3	5	21	1	4	0	228	302	456	758	228	303	33	8	333	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	348	316	88	27	3	3	21	72	6	10	9	278	335	411	747	133	350	21	6	329	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	146	127	38	4	5	4	13	22	3	2	6	299	378	504	882	205	330	15	9	380	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	60	44	12	1	0	0	14	6	2	2	2	273	467	295	762	23	316	10	23	375	140	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	340	292	83	20	6	6	33	76	12	11	6	284	380	455	835	171	365	22	10	370	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	107	78	24	4	0	3	20	17	7	4	2	308	486	474	960	167	356	16	19	429	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	101	85	21	6	0	3	12	29	4	4	2	247	366	424	790	176	340	29	12	358	128	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	498	425	103	19	2	18	62	136	8	8	6	242	349	424	773	181	312	27	12	346	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	195	154	36	11	0	7	35	56	4	1	3	234	389	442	830	208	312	29	18	371	137	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	462	404	93	24	3	16	37	129	17	7	6	230	321	423	744	193	295	28	8	330	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA	Colorado Springs Sky Sox	—	141	115	33	7	0	6	22	32	2	8	0	287	410	504	914	217	351	23	16	400	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	INTL	Tigres de Aragua	—	69	62	18	3	0	3	6	30	1	0	1	290	362	484	846	194	517	43	9	375	140	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA	Colorado Springs Sky Sox	—	50	41	7	3	0	1	7	23	1	3	1	171	306	317	623	146	333	46	14	285	6	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2009	22	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	438	410	90	26	6	9	12	129	10	11	4	220	259	378	637	159	287	29	3	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	259	228	51	8	3	8	19	75	7	5	6	224	303	390	694	167	284	29	7	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	32	29	9	2	0	0	2	6	0	3	2	310	355	379	734	69	403	19	6	337	114	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	A+ MLE	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	102	89	13	5	0	1	8	34	5	6	2	146	255	236	491	90	231	33	8	232	43	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	348	321	82	22	3	3	16	87	6	10	9	255	303	371	674	115	331	25	5	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	146	131	37	4	5	3	9	27	3	2	6	282	343	458	801	176	319	18	6	334	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	340	301	72	16	6	6	24	96	12	11	6	239	320	392	713	153	324	28	7	308	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	107	84	22	3	0	2	14	22	7	4	2	262	410	369	779	107	312	21	13	346	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	498	445	93	16	2	17	42	161	8	8	6	209	289	369	657	160	280	32	8	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	462	417	79	18	3	15	24	152	17	7	6	189	262	355	617	165	250	33	5	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	Colorado Springs Sky Sox	—	141	122	25	4	0	5	15	42	2	8	0	205	302	361	663	156	266	30	11	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA MLE	Colorado Springs Sky Sox	—	50	43	5	2	0	1	5	31	1	3	1	116	224	233	457	116	244	62	10	177	6	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	438	410	90	26	6	9	12	129	10	11	4	220	259	378	637	159	295	29	3	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A RAW	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	438	404	111	34	7	12	18	95	10	11	4	275	322	483	804	208	330	22	4	348	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AAA MLE	4 teams	—	456	404	87	19	3	11	33	133	13	18	10	215	296	359	654	144	289	29	7	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AAA RAW	4 teams	—	456	395	97	21	4	13	42	112	13	18	10	246	338	418	755	172	308	25	9	335	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	554	507	132	29	9	6	28	129	11	14	17	260	313	389	702	128	335	23	5	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	554	487	138	32	8	7	48	100	11	14	17	283	361	425	786	142	341	18	9	347	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	548	474	116	24	8	9	46	144	23	19	10	245	341	386	727	141	331	26	8	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	548	455	128	30	6	12	65	122	23	19	10	281	398	453	851	171	359	22	12	379	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	693	618	129	22	2	24	58	225	12	9	9	209	289	367	657	159	282	32	8	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	693	579	139	30	2	25	97	192	12	9	9	240	360	428	789	188	312	28	14	353	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	462	417	79	18	3	15	24	152	17	7	6	189	262	355	617	165	254	33	5	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA RAW	Toledo Mud Hens	—	462	404	93	24	3	16	37	129	17	7	6	230	321	423	744	193	295	28	8	330	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	210	182	38	6	0	8	23	63	3	8	1	209	308	374	681	165	270	30	11	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	210	177	51	10	0	9	28	62	3	8	1	288	394	497	891	209	396	30	13	392	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA MLE	Colorado Springs Sky Sox	—	50	43	5	2	0	1	5	31	1	3	1	116	224	233	457	116	333	62	10	177	6	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA RAW	Colorado Springs Sky Sox	—	50	41	7	3	0	1	7	23	1	3	1	171	306	317	623	146	333	46	14	285	6	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	22	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	438	413	90	26	6	9	12	129	10	11	4	218	259	375	635	157	287	29	3	269	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	23	AAA MLE	4 teams	—	456	407	87	19	3	11	33	133	13	18	10	214	296	356	652	143	280	29	7	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	554	510	132	29	9	6	28	129	11	14	17	259	313	386	699	127	327	23	5	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	548	474	116	24	8	9	46	144	23	19	10	245	341	386	727	141	321	26	8	317	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	693	618	129	22	2	24	58	225	12	9	9	209	289	367	657	159	280	32	8	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	27	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	462	418	79	18	3	15	24	152	17	7	6	189	262	354	616	165	250	33	5	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	210	182	38	6	0	8	23	63	3	8	1	209	308	374	681	165	266	30	11	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	29	AAA MLE	Colorado Springs Sky Sox	—	50	44	5	2	0	1	5	31	1	3	1	114	224	227	452	114	244	62	10	177	6	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	3411	3055	676	146	31	83	229	1006	90	89	58	221	295	371	666	150	299	29	7	288	81	-76	-5	+0	-37	+74	-4.5
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	582	129	28	6	16	44	192	17	17	11	222	295	373	668	151	300	30	7	288	81	-14	-1	+0	-7	+14	-0.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 AAAColorado Springs Sky Sox · 50 PAwOBA .284 → .177 (−108)K% 46.0% → 61.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	46.00%	÷0.964	×1.290	—	—	61.57%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.00%	÷1.052	×0.710	—	×0.982	9.28%
HBP% /PA	2.00%	—	×0.980	—	×0.982	1.92%
Singles /BIP	16.67%	÷1.046	×0.900	—	×0.982	14.08%
Doubles /BIP	16.67%	÷1.196	×0.810	—	×0.982	11.08%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	—	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.56%	÷0.973	×0.780	—	×0.982	4.37%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 109, 2B 139, 3B 130, K 93, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .284 → .177; ISO .146 → .080; BABIP .333 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAColorado Springs Sky Sox · 141 PAwOBA .390 → .296 (−94)K% 22.7% → 29.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.70%	÷0.979	×1.290	—	—	29.90%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	15.60%	÷1.015	×0.710	—	×0.992	10.82%
HBP% /PA	1.42%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	1.38%
Singles /BIP	24.10%	÷1.044	×0.900	×0.950	×0.992	19.58%
Doubles /BIP	8.43%	÷1.214	×0.810	×0.950	×0.992	5.30%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.950	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.23%	÷0.886	×0.780	—	×0.992	6.31%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 77, 1B 109, 2B 143, 3B 130, K 96, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .390 → .296; ISO .217 → .172; BABIP .351 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 462 PAwOBA .323 → .266 (−56)K% 27.9% → 32.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.92%	÷1.017	×1.200	—	—	32.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.01%	÷1.053	×0.690	—	×1.003	5.26%
HBP% /PA	3.68%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	3.47%
Singles /BIP	18.18%	÷0.999	×0.930	×0.950	×1.003	16.14%
Doubles /BIP	8.73%	÷1.031	×0.830	×0.950	×1.003	6.70%
Triples /BIP	1.09%	÷1.049	×0.970	×0.950	×1.003	0.96%
Home runs /BIP	5.82%	÷0.899	×0.840	—	×1.003	5.45%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 100, 2B 106, 3B 110, K 103, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .323 → .266; ISO .193 → .167; BABIP .295 → .250. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 498 PAwOBA .338 → .287 (−50)K% 27.3% → 32.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.31%	÷1.011	×1.200	—	—	32.41%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.45%	÷1.041	×0.690	—	×1.018	8.40%
HBP% /PA	1.61%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	1.54%
Singles /BIP	22.15%	÷1.016	×0.930	×0.986	×1.018	20.35%
Doubles /BIP	6.57%	÷0.994	×0.830	×0.986	×1.018	5.51%
Triples /BIP	0.69%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.986	×1.018	0.59%
Home runs /BIP	6.23%	÷0.883	×0.840	—	×1.018	6.03%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 77, 1B 103, 2B 99, 3B 130, K 102, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.

Result: wOBA .338 → .287; ISO .181 → .167; BABIP .312 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 340 PAwOBA .362 → .308 (−54)K% 22.4% → 28.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.35%	÷0.952	×1.200	—	—	28.17%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.71%	÷0.988	×0.690	—	×1.033	7.00%
HBP% /PA	3.53%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	3.43%
Singles /BIP	23.61%	÷1.045	×0.930	×0.973	×1.033	21.12%
Doubles /BIP	9.26%	÷1.015	×0.830	×0.973	×1.033	7.61%
Triples /BIP	2.78%	÷0.900	×0.970	×0.973	×1.033	3.01%
Home runs /BIP	2.78%	÷0.913	×0.840	—	×1.033	2.64%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 83, 1B 109, 2B 103, 3B 80, K 90, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.973.

Result: wOBA .362 → .308; ISO .171 → .154; BABIP .365 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAErie SeaWolves · 107 PAwOBA .423 → .346 (−77)K% 15.9% → 20.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.89%	÷0.948	×1.220	—	—	20.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	18.69%	÷1.013	×0.700	—	×0.998	12.89%
HBP% /PA	6.54%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	5.55%
Singles /BIP	27.87%	÷1.003	×0.970	×0.951	×0.998	25.58%
Doubles /BIP	6.56%	÷1.042	×0.860	×0.951	×0.998	5.14%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.950	×0.951	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.92%	÷1.260	×0.780	—	×0.998	3.04%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 152, 1B 101, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 90, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.951.

Result: wOBA .423 → .346; ISO .167 → .119; BABIP .356 → .312. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 348 PAwOBA .322 → .290 (−33)K% 20.7% → 25.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.69%	÷0.991	×1.200	—	—	25.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.03%	÷0.980	×0.690	—	×1.048	4.45%
HBP% /PA	1.72%	—	×0.940	—	×1.048	1.70%
Singles /BIP	22.54%	÷0.974	×0.930	×0.995	×1.048	22.45%
Doubles /BIP	11.07%	÷1.042	×0.830	×0.995	×1.048	9.19%
Triples /BIP	1.23%	÷0.932	×0.970	×0.995	×1.048	1.33%
Home runs /BIP	1.23%	÷0.922	×0.840	—	×1.048	1.17%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 95, 2B 108, 3B 86, K 98, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.995.

Result: wOBA .322 → .290; ISO .133 → .117; BABIP .350 → .331. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAErie SeaWolves · 146 PAwOBA .375 → .334 (−41)K% 15.1% → 18.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.07%	÷0.983	×1.220	—	—	18.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.90%	÷1.019	×0.700	—	×1.012	6.19%
HBP% /PA	2.05%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	1.77%
Singles /BIP	23.81%	÷1.011	×0.970	×1.014	×1.012	23.45%
Doubles /BIP	3.81%	÷1.005	×0.860	×1.014	×1.012	3.35%
Triples /BIP	4.76%	÷0.952	×0.950	×1.014	×1.012	4.88%
Home runs /BIP	3.81%	÷1.245	×0.780	—	×1.012	2.42%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 102, 2B 101, 3B 90, K 97, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.

Result: wOBA .375 → .334; ISO .205 → .172; BABIP .330 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .