Wilkin Ramirez

PosLF

B/TR/R

Born1985-10-25

Age (2027)41

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	27	AANew Britain R…	31	.172/.226/.207	0	1	1	—	.167/.194/.200
2013	27	MLBMIN	87	.272/.302/.370	0	0	86	-0.1
2014	28	AAA/INTL2 orgs	515	.261/.309/.360	5	9	55	—	.218/.250/.299
2015	29	AAAWSH	147	.232/.243/.387	3	3	39	—	.196/.201/.315
2016	30	No MLB games played
2017	31	No MLB games played
2018	32	No MLB games played
2019	33	No MLB games played
2020	34	No MLB games played
2021	35	No MLB games played
2022	36	No MLB games played
2023	37	No MLB games played
2024	38	No MLB games played
2025	39	No MLB games played
2026	40	No MLB games played

Last 3 seasons WAR -0.1

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	19	A	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	541	493	130	22	2	16	35	141	7	21	8	264	321	414	735	150	334	26	6	325	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	A+	Lakeland Tigers	—	263	249	56	10	4	8	10	69	2	8	2	225	261	394	654	169	276	26	4	286	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	133	121	26	3	1	2	8	38	2	6	2	215	275	306	581	91	293	29	6	262	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	A+	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	343	319	87	7	4	10	20	86	1	28	6	273	318	414	731	141	341	25	6	323	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	38	36	3	1	0	0	1	11	1	1	0	83	132	111	243	28	120	29	3	119	-46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	482	433	131	24	7	19	43	138	5	26	12	303	372	522	894	219	404	29	9	391	105	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	481	434	112	18	6	17	41	143	4	33	10	258	328	445	772	187	344	30	9	341	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	262	236	54	7	3	8	20	82	5	9	2	229	303	386	688	157	313	31	8	308	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AA	Erie SeaWolves	—	235	212	51	10	4	15	22	84	0	5	6	241	312	538	850	297	316	36	9	365	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	INTL	Toros del Este	—	25	23	3	0	0	1	1	4	0	0	0	130	167	261	428	130	105	16	4	184	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	MLB	Atlanta Braves	—	30	26	6	2	0	0	4	11	0	0	2	231	333	308	641	77	400	37	13	299	86	-1	-1	-2	-5	+1	-0.7
2011	25	AAA	Gwinnett Braves	—	313	288	77	16	3	11	17	70	1	19	6	267	310	458	769	191	314	22	5	330	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	INTL	Toros del Este	—	88	81	20	6	0	1	5	17	2	4	1	247	307	358	665	111	302	19	6	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	396	370	102	18	1	15	18	97	5	7	7	276	318	451	769	176	333	24	5	338	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	51	49	19	3	3	4	2	10	0	2	0	388	412	816	1.228	429	429	20	4	521	181	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	A+	Fort Myers Miracle	—	16	15	4	0	0	0	1	5	0	0	0	267	312	267	579		400	31	6	270	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	INTL	Toros del Este	—	56	47	10	5	1	0	5	13	2	1	0	213	315	362	677	149	286	23	9	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	MLB	Minnesota Twins	—	87	81	22	6	1	0	3	23	1	0	0	272	302	370	673	99	373	26	3	296	86	-1	+0	-0	-1	+2	-0.1
2013	27	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	31	29	5	1	0	0	2	6	0	1	0	172	226	207	433	34	217	19	6	203	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	417	386	101	23	3	4	22	104	4	8	2	262	308	368	676	106	343	25	5	300	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	INTL	Toros del Este	—	98	89	23	3	0	1	6	17	1	1	0	258	312	326	638	67	301	17	6	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	147	142	33	9	2	3	2	38	0	3	0	232	243	387	630	155	288	26	1	270	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	117	107	28	8	1	0	7	34	1	0	2	262	310	355	665	93	378	29	6	297	87	-2	-1	-2	-6	+3	-0.8
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	19	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	541	504	109	17	2	12	24	192	7	21	8	216	262	329	591	113	310	35	4	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	A+ MLE	Lakeland Tigers	—	263	251	47	9	3	6	8	98	2	8	2	187	218	319	537	131	269	37	3	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	133	123	25	3	1	2	6	46	2	6	2	203	252	293	545	89	289	35	5	227	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	A+ MLE	Lakeland Flying Tigers	—	343	324	71	6	3	8	15	122	1	28	6	219	256	330	586	111	317	36	4	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	38	36	3	1	0	0	1	13	1	1	0	83	132	111	243	28	113	34	3	100	-46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	482	446	117	20	6	14	30	168	5	26	12	262	316	428	744	166	389	35	6	324	105	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	481	445	100	15	6	14	30	172	4	33	10	225	280	380	660	155	322	36	6	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	262	242	44	5	2	7	14	102	5	9	2	182	241	306	547	124	276	39	5	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AA MLE	Erie SeaWolves	—	235	219	39	7	3	11	15	104	0	5	6	178	231	388	619	210	262	44	6	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	MLB MLE	Atlanta Braves	—	30	26	6	2	0	0	4	11	0	0	2	231	333	308	641	77	400	37	13	295	86	-1	-1	-2	-5	+1	-0.7
2011	25	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Braves	—	313	293	70	14	3	9	12	84	1	19	6	239	271	399	671	160	293	27	4	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	396	376	88	16	1	12	12	111	5	7	7	234	267	378	645	144	295	28	3	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	51	50	17	2	3	4	1	12	0	2	0	340	353	740	1.093	400	386	24	2	436	181	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	16	15	3	0	0	0	1	7	0	0	0	200	250	200	450		322	44	6	170	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	MLB MLE	Minnesota Twins	—	87	82	22	6	1	0	3	23	1	0	0	268	302	366	668	98	373	26	3	296	86	-1	+0	-0	-1	+2	-0.1
2013	27	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	31	30	5	1	0	0	1	7	0	1	0	167	194	200	394	33	202	23	3	169	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	417	395	86	17	3	3	13	125	4	8	2	218	250	299	549	81	298	30	3	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	147	143	28	7	2	2	1	44	0	3	0	196	201	315	516	119	253	30	1	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	19	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	541	504	109	17	2	12	24	192	7	21	8	216	262	329	591	113	318	35	4	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	19	A RAW	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	541	493	130	22	2	16	35	141	7	21	8	264	321	414	735	150	334	26	6	325	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	A+ MLE	Lakeland Tigers	—	263	251	47	9	3	6	8	98	2	8	2	187	218	319	537	131	275	37	3	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	A+ RAW	Lakeland Tigers	—	263	249	56	10	4	8	10	69	2	8	2	225	261	394	654	169	276	26	4	286	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	476	447	96	9	4	9	21	169	3	34	8	215	255	313	568	98	319	36	4	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	476	440	113	10	5	12	28	124	3	34	8	257	306	384	690	127	328	26	6	306	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	520	482	120	21	6	14	31	181	6	27	12	249	303	405	707	156	368	35	6	308	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	AA RAW	2 teams	—	520	469	134	25	7	19	44	149	6	27	12	286	355	490	845	205	381	29	8	371	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	481	445	100	15	6	14	30	172	4	33	10	225	280	380	660	155	330	36	6	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	AAA RAW	Toledo Mud Hens	—	481	434	112	18	6	17	41	143	4	33	10	258	328	445	772	187	344	30	9	341	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	522	484	87	13	5	19	30	217	5	14	8	180	235	345	580	165	271	42	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	522	471	108	17	7	24	43	170	5	14	8	229	301	448	749	219	300	33	8	328	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	431	401	96	21	4	11	20	119	3	23	9	239	281	394	675	155	310	28	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	431	395	103	24	3	12	26	98	3	23	9	261	311	428	739	167	316	23	6	322	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	4 teams	—	519	491	121	21	4	18	16	147	7	10	7	246	280	415	696	169	312	28	3	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA RAW	4 teams	—	519	481	135	26	5	19	26	125	7	10	7	281	327	474	801	193	340	24	5	349	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	118	112	27	7	1	0	4	30	1	1	0	241	274	321	595	80	325	25	3	262	64	-5	+0	-0	-1	+3	-0.4
2013	27	MLB RAW	2 teams	—	118	110	27	7	1	0	5	29	1	1	0	245	282	327	609	82	329	25	4	271	64	-5	+0	-0	-1	+3	-0.4
2014	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	515	488	106	21	4	4	15	154	5	9	2	217	248	301	549	84	303	30	3	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	515	475	124	26	3	5	28	121	5	9	2	261	309	360	669	99	334	23	5	298	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	147	143	28	7	2	2	1	44	0	3	0	196	201	315	516	119	260	30	1	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA RAW	Rochester Red Wings	—	147	142	33	9	2	3	2	38	0	3	0	232	243	387	630	155	288	26	1	270	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	19	A MLE	West Michigan Whitecaps	—	541	505	109	17	2	12	24	192	7	21	8	216	262	329	590	113	310	35	4	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	20	A+ MLE	Lakeland Tigers	—	263	251	47	9	3	6	8	98	2	8	2	187	218	319	537	131	269	37	3	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	21	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	476	449	96	9	4	9	21	169	3	34	8	214	255	312	567	98	309	36	4	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	520	478	120	21	6	14	31	181	6	27	12	251	303	408	710	157	369	35	6	308	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	23	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	481	444	100	15	6	14	30	172	4	33	10	225	280	381	660	155	322	36	6	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	24	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	522	482	87	13	5	19	30	217	5	14	8	180	235	346	582	166	269	42	6	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	431	405	96	21	4	11	20	119	3	23	9	237	281	390	671	153	302	28	5	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	26	AAA MLE	4 teams	—	519	491	121	21	4	18	16	147	7	10	7	246	280	415	696	169	306	28	3	294	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	27	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	118	112	27	7	1	0	4	30	1	1	0	241	274	321	595	80	328	25	3	262	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	515	490	106	21	4	4	15	154	5	9	2	216	248	300	548	84	298	30	3	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	29	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	147	145	28	7	2	2	1	44	0	3	0	193	201	310	512	117	253	30	1	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	117	107	28	8	1	0	7	34	1	0	2	262	310	355	665	93	378	29	6	297	67	-2	-1	-2	-6	+3	-0.8
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	594	156	44	6	0	39	189	6	0	11	263	312	357	669	94	380	29	6	297	67	-10	-4	-11	-33	+14	-4.5
Career	—	MLE		—	4533	4248	937	161	41	109	200	1523	43	183	66	221	263	355	618	134	312	34	4	267	67	-2	-1	-2	-6	+3	-0.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	609	135	23	6	16	29	218	6	26	9	222	264	358	622	136	313	34	4	267	67	-10	-4	-11	-33	+14	-4.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAARochester Red Wings · 147 PAwOBA .267 → .226 (−41)K% 25.9% → 30.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.85%	÷1.030	×1.200	—	—	30.11%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	1.36%	÷0.980	×0.690	—	×0.972	0.93%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.27%	÷0.979	×0.930	×0.981	×0.972	16.55%
Doubles /BIP	8.65%	÷0.987	×0.830	×0.981	×0.972	6.94%
Triples /BIP	1.92%	÷0.932	×0.970	×0.981	×0.972	1.91%
Home runs /BIP	2.88%	÷0.956	×0.840	—	×0.972	2.46%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 96, 2B 97, 3B 86, K 106, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.981.

Result: wOBA .267 → .226; ISO .155 → .130; BABIP .288 → .253. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAARochester Red Wings · 417 PAwOBA .295 → .240 (−55)K% 24.9% → 29.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.94%	÷1.002	×1.200	—	—	29.87%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.04%	÷1.125	×0.690	—	×0.982	3.03%
HBP% /PA	0.96%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	0.89%
Singles /BIP	25.18%	÷1.010	×0.930	×0.994	×0.982	22.64%
Doubles /BIP	8.16%	÷1.059	×0.830	×0.994	×0.982	6.24%
Triples /BIP	1.06%	÷0.900	×0.970	×0.994	×0.982	1.12%
Home runs /BIP	1.42%	÷1.075	×0.840	—	×0.982	1.09%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 115, 1B 102, 2B 112, 3B 80, K 100, BB 125 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.

Result: wOBA .295 → .240; ISO .106 → .084; BABIP .343 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AANew Britain Rock Cats · 31 PAwOBA .198 → .169 (−30)K% 19.4% → 23.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.35%	÷1.020	×1.220	—	—	23.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.45%	÷1.011	×0.700	—	×0.968	4.33%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	17.39%	÷0.995	×0.970	—	×0.968	16.41%
Doubles /BIP	4.35%	÷0.963	×0.860	—	×0.968	3.76%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.950	—	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.897	×0.780	—	×0.968	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 99, 2B 93, 3B 80, K 104, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .198 → .169; ISO .034 → .029; BABIP .217 → .202. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAARochester Red Wings · 396 PAwOBA .331 → .281 (−50)K% 24.5% → 28.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.49%	÷1.051	×1.200	—	—	27.96%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.55%	÷1.023	×0.690	—	×1.003	3.07%
HBP% /PA	1.26%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	1.19%
Singles /BIP	24.91%	÷1.052	×0.930	×0.999	×1.003	22.07%
Doubles /BIP	6.59%	÷0.913	×0.830	×0.999	×1.003	6.00%
Triples /BIP	0.37%	÷0.900	×0.970	×0.999	×1.003	0.40%
Home runs /BIP	5.49%	÷1.010	×0.840	—	×1.003	4.58%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 110, 2B 83, 3B 80, K 110, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .331 → .281; ISO .176 → .149; BABIP .333 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AANew Britain Rock Cats · 51 PAwOBA .505 → .436 (−69)K% 19.6% → 24.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.61%	÷0.983	×1.220	—	—	24.35%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.92%	÷1.036	×0.700	—	×0.978	2.59%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.08%	÷1.015	×0.970	—	×0.978	21.57%
Doubles /BIP	7.69%	÷1.067	×0.860	—	×0.978	6.06%
Triples /BIP	7.69%	÷0.981	×0.950	—	×0.978	7.29%
Home runs /BIP	10.26%	÷0.811	×0.780	—	×0.978	9.64%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 62, 1B 103, 2B 113, 3B 96, K 97, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .505 → .436; ISO .429 → .377; BABIP .429 → .386. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 16 PAwOBA .263 → .170 (−93)K% 31.2% → 46.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.25%	÷0.956	×1.420	—	—	46.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.25%	÷0.977	×0.750	—	×0.958	4.59%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×0.958	0.00%
Singles /BIP	40.00%	÷1.095	×0.920	—	×0.958	32.20%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.022	×0.960	—	×0.958	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.052	×0.810	—	×0.958	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.930	×0.880	—	×0.958	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 119, 2B 104, 3B 110, K 91, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 22.8 → −4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .263 → .170; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .400 → .322. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAGwinnett Braves · 313 PAwOBA .324 → .285 (−39)K% 22.4% → 26.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.36%	÷1.002	×1.200	—	—	26.80%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.43%	÷0.970	×0.690	—	×1.018	3.93%
HBP% /PA	0.32%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	0.31%
Singles /BIP	21.56%	÷0.999	×0.930	×0.999	×1.018	20.42%
Doubles /BIP	7.34%	÷0.923	×0.830	×0.999	×1.018	6.71%
Triples /BIP	1.38%	÷1.003	×0.970	×0.999	×1.018	1.35%
Home runs /BIP	5.05%	÷1.055	×0.840	—	×1.018	4.09%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 111, 1B 100, 2B 85, 3B 101, K 100, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .324 → .285; ISO .191 → .163; BABIP .314 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAGwinnett Braves · 262 PAwOBA .301 → .243 (−58)K% 31.3% → 39.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.30%	÷0.964	×1.200	—	—	38.98%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.63%	÷1.026	×0.690	—	×1.033	5.30%
HBP% /PA	1.91%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	1.85%
Singles /BIP	23.38%	÷1.032	×0.930	×0.962	×1.033	20.93%
Doubles /BIP	4.55%	÷0.968	×0.830	×0.962	×1.033	3.88%
Triples /BIP	1.95%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.962	×1.033	1.63%
Home runs /BIP	5.19%	÷0.921	×0.840	—	×1.033	4.90%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 106, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 93, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.962.

Result: wOBA .301 → .243; ISO .157 → .131; BABIP .313 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .