Sam Fuld

PosLF

B/TL/L

Born1981-11-20

Age (2027)45

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

MLBLAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR
2013	31	MLBTB	200	.199/.273/.267	2	8	49	-1.1
2014	32	MLBOakland Athle…	402	.239/.322/.342	4	21	86	1.1
2015	33	MLBOakland Athle…	325	.197/.276/.293	2	9	61	-0.6
2016	34	No MLB games played
2017	35	No MLB games played
2018	36	No MLB games played
2019	37	No MLB games played
2020	38	No MLB games played
2021	39	No MLB games played
2022	40	No MLB games played
2023	41	No MLB games played
2024	42	No MLB games played
2025	43	No MLB games played
2026	44	No MLB games played

Last 3 seasons WAR -0.7

Contract

No contract data on file.

Skills · percentileStatcast 2015

Speed66

xwOBA11

Barrel%10

Avg EV10

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	23	A	Peoria Chiefs	—	508	443	133	32	6	5	50	44	7	18	11	300	380	433	813	133	322	9	10	360	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	24	A+	Daytona Cubs	—	405	353	106	19	6	4	40	54	5	22	3	300	379	422	801	122	345	13	10	355	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	25	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	63	52	14	4	1	1	9	5	2	2	0	269	397	442	839	173	283	8	14	378	104	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	25	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	392	335	97	23	2	2	41	38	5	10	3	290	375	388	763	99	319	10	10	338	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	26	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	78	63	14	3	0	1	8	12	0	3	2	222	301	317	619	95	260	15	10	264	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	26	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	397	339	92	16	3	5	50	40	3	7	8	271	370	381	750	109	292	10	13	339	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	27	MLB	Chicago Cubs	—	115	97	29	6	1	1	17	10	1	2	1	299	409	412	821	113	326	9	15	374	135	+5	+0	-0	+2	+2	0.9
2009	27	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	370	328	93	17	10	2	38	24	1	23	5	284	360	415	774	131	299	6	10	344	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	28	MLB	Chicago Cubs	—	31	28	4	1	0	0	3	5	0	0	0	143	226	179	404	36	174	16	10	197	18	-3	+0	+1	+2	+1	-0.0
2010	28	AAA	Iowa Cubs	—	440	368	100	15	9	4	66	37	2	21	9	272	385	394	779	122	291	8	15	352	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	29	MLB	Tampa Bay Rays	—	346	308	74	18	5	3	32	49	1	20	8	240	314	360	674	120	276	14	9	300	88	-5	+1	+7	-4	+7	0.7
2012	30	MLB	Tampa Bay Rays	—	107	98	25	3	2	0	8	14	1	7	2	255	318	327	644	71	298	13	7	294	83	-2	+1	+1	-2	+2	0.0
2012	30	AAA	Durham Bulls	—	21	18	3	1	0	0	3	3	0	0	1	167	286	222	508	56	200	14	14	247	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	30	A+	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	15	13	2	0	0	0	2	3	0	0	1	154	267	154	421		200	20	13	214	-8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	31	MLB	Tampa Bay Rays	—	200	176	35	0	3	2	17	28	1	8	2	199	273	267	540	68	223	14	8	244	49	-12	+1	-2	-2	+4	-1.1
2014	32	MLB	Oakland Athletics	—	402	351	84	16	4	4	43	63	0	21	4	239	322	342	664	103	280	16	11	298	86	-7	+3	+4	+1	+9	1.1
2014	32	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	16	14	6	2	0	1	2	1	0	0	0	429	500	786	1.286	357	417	6	12	547	187	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	33	MLB	Oakland Athletics	—	325	290	57	16	3	2	30	55	2	9	3	197	276	293	570	97	235	17	9	260	61	-15	+1	+5	-3	+7	-0.6
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	1526	1348	308	60	18	12	150	224	6	67	20	228	309	326	635	98	265	15	10	287	80	-36	+5	+16	-6	+33	1.2
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	23	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	508	459	124	28	6	4	34	60	7	18	11	270	330	383	713	113	292	12	7	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	24	A+ MLE	Daytona Cubs	—	405	367	97	18	5	3	26	77	5	22	3	264	322	365	687	101	318	19	6	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	25	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	63	55	14	4	1	1	6	6	2	2	0	255	349	418	767	164	260	10	10	322	104	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	25	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	392	349	98	23	2	2	27	46	5	10	3	281	341	375	717	95	302	12	7	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	26	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	78	67	15	3	0	1	6	15	0	3	2	224	288	313	601	90	240	19	8	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	26	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	397	357	87	15	3	4	32	49	3	7	8	244	311	336	647	92	266	12	8	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	27	MLB MLE	Chicago Cubs	—	115	98	29	6	1	1	16	10	1	2	1	296	400	408	808	112	326	9	14	368	135	+5	+0	-0	+2	+2	0.9
2009	27	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	370	340	86	14	9	2	26	31	1	23	5	253	308	365	673	112	268	8	7	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	28	MLB MLE	Chicago Cubs	—	31	28	4	1	0	0	3	5	0	0	0	143	226	179	404	36	174	16	10	195	18	-3	+0	+1	+2	+1	-0.0
2010	28	AAA MLE	Iowa Cubs	—	440	393	93	13	8	4	41	47	2	21	9	237	312	341	653	104	254	11	9	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	29	MLB MLE	Tampa Bay Rays	—	346	308	73	18	5	3	32	49	1	20	8	237	311	357	668	120	276	14	9	299	88	-5	+1	+7	-4	+7	0.7
2012	30	MLB MLE	Tampa Bay Rays	—	107	98	25	3	2	0	8	14	1	7	2	255	318	327	644	71	298	13	7	290	83	-2	+1	+1	-2	+2	0.0
2012	30	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	21	19	3	1	0	0	2	4	0	0	1	158	238	211	449	53	174	19	10	190	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	30	A+ MLE	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	15	14	2	0	0	0	1	4	0	0	1	143	200	143	343		162	27	7	156	-8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	31	MLB MLE	Tampa Bay Rays	—	200	176	34	0	3	2	17	28	1	8	2	193	268	261	529	68	223	14	8	240	49	-12	+1	-2	-2	+4	-1.1
2014	32	MLB MLE	Oakland Athletics	—	402	353	83	15	4	4	41	63	0	21	4	235	315	334	649	99	280	16	10	295	86	-7	+3	+4	+1	+9	1.1
2014	32	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	16	15	6	2	0	1	1	1	0	0	0	400	438	733	1.171	333	364	6	6	445	187	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	33	MLB MLE	Oakland Athletics	—	325	291	56	15	3	2	29	55	2	9	3	192	270	285	555	93	235	17	9	258	61	-15	+1	+5	-3	+7	-0.6
2005	23	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	508	459	124	28	6	4	34	60	7	18	11	270	330	383	713	113	301	12	7	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	23	A RAW	Peoria Chiefs	—	508	443	133	32	6	5	50	44	7	18	11	300	380	433	813	133	322	9	10	360	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	24	A+ MLE	Daytona Cubs	—	405	367	97	18	5	3	26	77	5	22	3	264	322	365	687	101	326	19	6	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	24	A+ RAW	Daytona Cubs	—	405	353	106	19	6	4	40	54	5	22	3	300	379	422	801	122	345	13	10	355	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	455	403	109	26	3	2	34	53	7	12	3	270	338	365	703	94	305	12	7	308	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	455	387	111	27	3	3	50	43	7	12	3	287	378	395	774	109	314	9	11	344	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	475	425	102	18	3	5	37	64	3	10	10	240	305	332	637	92	269	13	8	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	26	AA RAW	2 teams	—	475	402	106	19	3	6	58	52	3	10	10	264	359	371	730	107	287	11	12	326	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	485	438	115	20	10	3	42	41	2	25	6	263	330	374	704	112	283	8	9	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	485	425	122	23	11	3	55	34	2	25	6	287	371	414	785	127	305	7	11	351	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	471	421	97	14	8	4	44	52	2	21	9	230	306	330	636	100	253	11	9	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	471	396	104	16	9	4	69	42	2	21	9	263	375	379	754	116	283	9	15	342	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	29	MLB MLE	Tampa Bay Rays	—	346	308	73	18	5	3	32	49	1	20	8	237	311	357	668	120	272	14	9	299	88	-5	+1	+7	-4	+7	0.7
2011	29	MLB RAW	Tampa Bay Rays	—	346	308	74	18	5	3	32	49	1	20	8	240	314	360	674	120	276	14	9	300	88	-5	+1	+7	-4	+7	0.7
2012	30	MLB MLE	3 teams	—	143	131	29	4	2	0	11	22	1	7	4	221	287	282	569	61	266	15	8	262	63	-6	-0	+1	-2	+3	-0.4
2012	30	MLB RAW	3 teams	—	143	129	30	4	2	0	13	20	1	7	4	233	308	295	602	62	275	14	9	279	63	-6	-0	+1	-2	+3	-0.4
2013	31	MLB MLE	Tampa Bay Rays	—	200	176	34	0	3	2	17	28	1	8	2	193	268	261	529	68	216	14	8	240	49	-12	+1	-2	-2	+4	-1.1
2013	31	MLB RAW	Tampa Bay Rays	—	200	176	35	0	3	2	17	28	1	8	2	199	273	267	540	68	223	14	8	244	49	-12	+1	-2	-2	+4	-1.1
2014	32	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	418	368	89	17	4	5	42	64	0	21	4	242	320	351	670	109	279	15	10	301	90	-5	+3	+4	+1	+9	1.3
2014	32	MLB RAW	2 teams	—	418	365	90	18	4	5	45	64	0	21	4	247	329	359	688	112	285	15	11	307	90	-5	+3	+4	+1	+9	1.3
2015	33	MLB MLE	Oakland Athletics	—	325	291	56	15	3	2	29	55	2	9	3	192	270	285	555	93	230	17	9	258	61	-15	+1	+5	-3	+7	-0.6
2015	33	MLB RAW	Oakland Athletics	—	325	290	57	16	3	2	30	55	2	9	3	197	276	293	570	97	235	17	9	260	61	-15	+1	+5	-3	+7	-0.6
2005	23	A MLE	Peoria Chiefs	—	508	462	124	28	6	4	34	60	7	18	11	268	330	381	711	113	292	12	7	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	24	A+ MLE	Daytona Cubs	—	405	371	97	18	5	3	26	77	5	22	3	261	322	361	683	100	318	19	6	303	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	455	411	109	26	3	2	34	53	7	12	3	265	338	358	696	92	296	12	7	308	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	26	AA MLE	2 teams	—	475	432	102	18	3	5	37	64	3	10	10	236	305	326	632	90	262	13	8	280	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	485	438	115	20	10	3	42	41	2	25	6	263	330	374	704	112	282	8	9	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	471	422	97	14	8	4	44	52	2	21	9	230	306	329	636	100	249	11	9	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	29	MLB MLE	Tampa Bay Rays	—	346	310	73	18	5	3	32	49	1	20	8	235	311	355	666	119	276	14	9	299	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	30	MLB MLE	3 teams	—	143	130	29	4	2	0	11	22	1	7	4	223	287	285	571	62	265	15	8	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	31	MLB MLE	Tampa Bay Rays	—	200	180	34	0	3	2	17	28	1	8	2	189	268	256	524	67	223	14	8	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	32	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	418	373	89	17	4	5	42	64	0	21	4	239	320	346	665	107	283	15	10	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	33	MLB MLE	Oakland Athletics	—	325	291	56	15	3	2	29	55	2	9	3	192	270	285	555	93	235	17	9	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	1526	1348	308	60	18	12	150	224	6	67	20	228	309	326	635	98	265	15	10	287	83	-36	+5	+16	-6	+33	1.2
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	574	132	26	8	5	64	95	3	29	9	230	311	329	640	99	266	15	10	287	83	-15	+2	+7	-3	+14	0.5
Career	—	MLE		—	4231	3787	925	178	52	33	348	565	31	173	63	244	313	345	658	101	278	13	8	291	83	-36	+5	+16	-6	+33	1.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	582	142	27	8	5	53	87	5	27	10	244	312	344	656	100	277	13	8	291	83	-15	+2	+7	-3	+14	0.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2014 AANew Britain Rock Cats · 16 PAwOBA .532 → .445 (−87)K% 6.2% → 7.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	6.25%	÷0.989	×1.220	—	—	7.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.50%	÷1.155	×0.700	—	×0.940	7.12%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.940	0.00%
Singles /BIP	23.08%	÷0.967	×0.970	—	×0.940	21.77%
Doubles /BIP	15.38%	÷0.999	×0.860	—	×0.940	12.45%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.011	×0.950	—	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.69%	÷0.956	×0.780	—	×0.940	5.90%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 93, 2B 100, 3B 102, K 98, BB 131 — applied at half strength. Age: age 33 vs a level average of 24.8 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (8.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .532 → .445; ISO .357 → .293; BABIP .417 → .364. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAADurham Bulls · 21 PAwOBA .242 → .190 (−51)K% 14.3% → 17.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.29%	÷1.008	×1.200	—	—	17.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.29%	÷1.046	×0.690	—	×0.962	9.06%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	0.00%
Singles /BIP	13.33%	÷0.987	×0.930	—	×0.962	12.08%
Doubles /BIP	6.67%	÷0.998	×0.830	—	×0.962	5.34%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.942	×0.970	—	×0.962	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.093	×0.840	—	×0.962	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 97, 2B 100, 3B 88, K 102, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .242 → .190; ISO .056 → .046; BABIP .200 → .174. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 A+Charlotte Stone Crabs · 15 PAwOBA .209 → .156 (−53)K% 20.0% → 27.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.00%	÷1.020	×1.420	—	—	27.83%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.33%	÷0.966	×0.750	—	×0.940	9.73%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×0.940	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷1.067	×0.920	—	×0.940	16.20%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.002	×0.960	—	×0.940	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	—	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.106	×0.880	—	×0.940	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 121, 1B 113, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 104, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 22.8 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (8.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .209 → .156; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .200 → .162. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAIowa Cubs · 440 PAwOBA .344 → .288 (−56)K% 8.4% → 10.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.41%	÷1.017	×1.290	—	—	10.66%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.55%	÷1.086	×0.710	—	×0.982	9.33%
HBP% /PA	0.45%	—	×0.980	—	×0.982	0.44%
Singles /BIP	21.75%	÷1.019	×0.900	×1.026	×0.982	19.36%
Doubles /BIP	4.53%	÷1.001	×0.810	×1.026	×0.982	3.69%
Triples /BIP	2.72%	÷0.979	×0.810	×1.026	×0.982	2.27%
Home runs /BIP	1.21%	÷0.881	×0.780	—	×0.982	1.05%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 104, 2B 100, 3B 96, K 103, BB 117 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.

Result: wOBA .344 → .288; ISO .122 → .108; BABIP .291 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 AAAIowa Cubs · 370 PAwOBA .336 → .291 (−46)K% 6.5% → 8.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	6.49%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	8.37%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.00%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×0.992	7.04%
HBP% /PA	0.27%	—	×0.980	—	×0.992	0.26%
Singles /BIP	21.05%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.034	×0.992	19.44%
Doubles /BIP	5.59%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.034	×0.992	4.65%
Triples /BIP	3.29%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.034	×0.992	2.73%
Home runs /BIP	0.66%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.992	0.51%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.034.

Result: wOBA .336 → .291; ISO .131 → .111; BABIP .299 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AATennessee Smokies · 397 PAwOBA .332 → .289 (−43)K% 10.1% → 12.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.08%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	12.29%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.09%	÷1.000	×0.680	—	×0.978	8.04%
HBP% /PA	0.76%	—	×0.840	—	×0.978	0.62%
Singles /BIP	22.74%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.018	×0.978	20.84%
Doubles /BIP	5.35%	÷1.000	×0.910	×1.018	×0.978	4.85%
Triples /BIP	1.00%	÷1.000	×0.880	×1.018	×0.978	0.88%
Home runs /BIP	1.67%	÷1.000	×0.800	—	×0.978	1.31%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.

Result: wOBA .332 → .289; ISO .109 → .098; BABIP .292 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AAAIowa Cubs · 78 PAwOBA .257 → .237 (−20)K% 15.4% → 19.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.38%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	19.85%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.26%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.003	7.30%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.00%
Singles /BIP	19.61%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.050	×1.003	18.58%
Doubles /BIP	5.88%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.050	×1.003	5.02%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.050	×1.003	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.96%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.003	1.53%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .257 → .237; ISO .095 → .087; BABIP .260 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2007 AATennessee Smokies · 392 PAwOBA .331 → .306 (−26)K% 9.7% → 11.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.69%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	11.83%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.20%	÷1.000	×0.680	—	×0.988	6.86%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.840	—	×0.988	1.06%
Singles /BIP	23.57%	÷1.000	×0.920	×1.047	×0.988	22.42%
Doubles /BIP	7.74%	÷1.000	×0.910	×1.047	×0.988	7.29%
Triples /BIP	0.67%	÷1.000	×0.880	×1.047	×0.988	0.61%
Home runs /BIP	0.67%	÷1.000	×0.800	—	×0.988	0.53%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.

Result: wOBA .331 → .306; ISO .099 → .095; BABIP .319 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).