Luis Martinez

PosC

B/TR/R

Born1985-04-03

Age (2027)42

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	28	AABowie Baysox	229	.257/.323/.350	1	0	64	—	.238/.279/.327
2014	29	AAASF	259	.242/.319/.364	4	0	55	—	.203/.268/.297
2015	30	AAA/AA2 orgs	313	.208/.300/.266	1	1	32	—	.185/.248/.230

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2007	22	A	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	88	78	18	3	0	1	8	23	0	0	0	231	302	308	610	77	309	26	9	275	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	23	A	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	364	305	68	12	1	3	51	66	2	3	1	223	338	298	636	75	275	18	14	295	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	24	AAA	Portland Beavers	—	39	35	6	0	0	0	4	7	0	0	0	171	256	171	428		214	18	10	211	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	24	A+	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	321	280	84	20	0	4	34	58	7	2	1	300	389	414	804	114	367	18	11	365	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	25	AA	San Antonio Missions	—	410	358	101	16	1	2	49	59	1	3	2	282	370	349	719	67	331	14	12	330	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	25	INTL	Peoria Saguaros	—	41	36	13	0	1	0	3	6	1	0	0	361	425	417	842	56	419	15	7	373	139	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	26	MLB	San Diego Padres	—	68	59	12	1	1	1	8	14	1	1	0	203	309	305	614	102	250	21	12	286	67	-3	+0	-4	+5	+1	-0.0
2011	26	AAA	Tucson Padres	—	219	198	64	17	1	1	17	46	2	2	0	323	382	434	817	111	412	21	8	363	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	27	MLB	Texas Rangers	—	19	18	2	0	0	0	0	4	1	0	0	111	158	111	269		143	21	0	134	-23	-3	+0	-2	+5	+0	0.1
2012	27	AAA	Round Rock Express	—	247	215	58	15	2	2	26	45	2	0	0	270	354	386	740	116	327	18	11	330	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	28	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	229	206	53	16	0	1	18	41	2	0	2	257	323	350	673	92	311	18	8	302	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	29	AAA	Sacramento River Cats	—	259	231	56	16	0	4	20	43	6	0	0	242	319	364	683	121	283	17	8	308	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	30	AAA	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	67	55	9	0	0	0	11	12	0	0	0	164	303	164	467		209	18	16	236	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	30	AA	Portland Sea Dogs	—	246	219	48	13	0	1	22	44	3	1	2	219	299	292	591	73	269	18	9	273	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	87	77	14	1	1	1	8	18	2	1	0	182	276	260	536	78	224	21	9	253	57	-4	+0	-6	+10	+2	0.2
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2007	22	A MLE	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	88	80	16	2	0	1	6	31	0	0	0	200	256	263	518	62	292	35	7	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	23	A MLE	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	364	321	61	10	1	2	35	90	2	3	1	190	274	246	520	56	252	25	10	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	24	AAA MLE	Portland Beavers	—	39	37	6	0	0	0	2	9	0	0	0	162	205	162	367		202	23	5	170	1	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	24	A+ MLE	Lake Elsinore Storm	—	321	290	75	16	0	4	24	78	7	2	1	259	330	355	685	97	337	24	7	299	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	25	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	410	373	101	15	1	2	34	72	1	3	2	271	333	332	666	62	326	18	8	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	26	MLB MLE	San Diego Padres	—	68	61	12	1	1	1	6	14	1	1	0	197	279	295	574	98	250	21	9	267	67	-3	+0	-4	+5	+1	-0.0
2011	26	AAA MLE	Tucson Padres	—	219	203	56	14	1	1	12	64	2	2	0	276	323	369	692	94	378	29	5	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	27	MLB MLE	Texas Rangers	—	19	18	2	0	0	0	0	4	1	0	0	111	158	111	269		143	21	0	133	-23	-3	+0	-2	+5	+0	0.1
2012	27	AAA MLE	Round Rock Express	—	247	222	54	14	1	2	19	56	2	0	0	243	309	342	651	99	301	23	8	286	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	28	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	229	214	51	16	0	1	10	50	2	0	2	238	279	327	606	89	296	22	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	29	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	259	236	48	13	0	3	15	56	6	0	0	203	268	297	565	93	252	22	6	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	30	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	67	59	9	0	0	0	7	15	0	0	0	153	242	153	395		195	22	10	190	15	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	30	AA MLE	Portland Sea Dogs	—	246	227	44	10	0	1	14	55	3	1	2	194	250	251	501	57	246	22	6	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	22	A MLE	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	88	80	16	2	0	1	6	31	0	0	0	200	256	263	518	62	306	35	7	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	22	A RAW	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	88	78	18	3	0	1	8	23	0	0	0	231	302	308	610	77	309	26	9	275	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	23	A MLE	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	364	321	61	10	1	2	35	90	2	3	1	190	274	246	520	56	258	25	10	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	23	A RAW	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	364	305	68	12	1	3	51	66	2	3	1	223	338	298	636	75	275	18	14	295	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	360	327	80	16	0	4	26	87	7	2	1	245	314	330	644	86	322	24	7	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	360	315	90	20	0	4	38	65	7	2	1	286	375	387	762	102	350	18	11	348	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	451	409	111	17	1	2	37	79	2	3	2	271	335	333	667	61	329	18	8	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	451	394	114	16	2	2	52	65	2	3	2	289	375	355	730	66	339	14	12	334	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	287	264	68	15	2	2	18	78	3	3	0	258	312	352	665	95	355	27	6	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	287	257	76	18	2	2	25	60	3	3	0	296	365	405	770	109	376	21	9	345	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	266	240	56	14	1	2	19	60	3	0	0	233	298	325	623	92	298	23	7	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	266	233	60	15	2	2	26	49	3	0	0	258	340	365	705	107	314	18	10	316	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	28	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	229	214	51	16	0	1	10	50	2	0	2	238	279	327	606	89	301	22	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	28	AA RAW	Bowie Baysox	—	229	206	53	16	0	1	18	41	2	0	2	257	323	350	673	92	311	18	8	302	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	29	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	259	236	48	13	0	3	15	56	6	0	0	203	268	297	565	93	254	22	6	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	29	AAA RAW	Sacramento River Cats	—	259	231	56	16	0	4	20	43	6	0	0	242	319	364	683	121	283	17	8	308	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	30	AA MLE	2 teams	—	313	286	52	10	0	1	21	70	3	1	2	182	245	227	472	45	236	22	7	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	30	AA RAW	2 teams	—	313	274	57	13	0	1	33	56	3	1	2	208	300	266	566	58	257	18	11	265	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	22	A MLE	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	88	82	16	2	0	1	6	31	0	0	0	195	256	256	512	61	292	35	7	223	37	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	23	A MLE	Fort Wayne Wizards	—	364	324	61	10	1	2	35	90	2	3	1	188	274	244	518	56	252	25	10	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	360	324	80	16	0	4	26	87	7	2	1	247	314	333	647	86	322	24	7	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	451	409	111	17	1	2	37	79	2	3	2	271	335	333	667	61	326	18	8	297	87	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	287	264	68	15	2	2	18	78	3	3	0	258	312	352	665	95	348	27	6	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	266	242	56	14	1	2	19	60	3	0	0	231	298	322	620	91	290	23	7	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	28	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	229	215	51	16	0	1	10	50	2	0	2	237	279	326	604	88	296	22	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	29	AAA MLE	Sacramento River Cats	—	259	236	48	13	0	3	15	56	6	0	0	203	268	297	565	93	252	22	6	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	30	AA MLE	2 teams	—	313	286	52	10	0	1	21	70	3	1	2	182	245	227	472	45	235	22	7	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	87	77	14	1	1	1	8	18	2	1	0	182	276	260	536	78	224	21	9	253	65	-4	+0	-6	+10	+2	0.2
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	575	103	7	7	7	60	134	15	7	0	179	274	252	526	73	221	21	9	253	65	-33	+1	-45	+74	+14	1.1
Career	—	MLE		—	2617	2377	543	113	5	18	187	601	28	12	8	228	292	303	595	74	296	23	7	264	65	-4	+0	-6	+10	+2	0.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	590	134	28	1	4	46	149	7	3	2	227	290	298	589	71	295	23	7	264	65	-33	+1	-45	+74	+14	1.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 246 PAwOBA .267 → .223 (−45)K% 17.9% → 22.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.89%	÷0.983	×1.220	—	—	22.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.94%	÷1.067	×0.700	—	×0.948	5.56%
HBP% /PA	1.22%	—	×0.850	—	×0.948	0.98%
Singles /BIP	19.43%	÷0.970	×0.970	×1.014	×0.948	18.67%
Doubles /BIP	7.43%	÷1.026	×0.860	×1.014	×0.948	5.99%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.014	×0.948	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.57%	÷0.994	×0.780	—	×0.948	0.43%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 94, 2B 105, 3B 130, K 97, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 24.8 → −5.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.

Result: wOBA .267 → .223; ISO .073 → .058; BABIP .269 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAPawtucket Red Sox · 67 PAwOBA .231 → .190 (−41)K% 17.9% → 22.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.91%	÷0.956	×1.200	—	—	22.49%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	16.42%	÷0.996	×0.690	—	×0.972	11.06%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	0.00%
Singles /BIP	20.93%	÷0.989	×0.930	×1.018	×0.972	19.47%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.867	×0.830	×1.018	×0.972	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.012	×0.970	×1.018	×0.972	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.012	×0.840	—	×0.972	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 98, 2B 73, 3B 102, K 91, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.

Result: wOBA .231 → .190; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .209 → .195. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAASacramento River Cats · 259 PAwOBA .300 → .249 (−51)K% 16.6% → 21.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.60%	÷0.998	×1.290	—	—	21.47%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.72%	÷0.953	×0.710	—	×0.982	5.65%
HBP% /PA	2.32%	—	×0.980	—	×0.982	2.23%
Singles /BIP	19.15%	÷0.975	×0.900	×1.006	×0.982	17.46%
Doubles /BIP	8.51%	÷0.929	×0.810	×1.006	×0.982	7.33%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.072	×0.810	×1.006	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.13%	÷1.092	×0.780	—	×0.982	1.49%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 95, 2B 86, 3B 114, K 100, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.

Result: wOBA .300 → .249; ISO .121 → .094; BABIP .283 → .252. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AABowie Baysox · 229 PAwOBA .299 → .263 (−36)K% 17.9% → 22.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.90%	÷0.991	×1.220	—	—	22.04%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.86%	÷1.189	×0.700	—	×0.968	4.48%
HBP% /PA	0.87%	—	×0.850	—	×0.968	0.72%
Singles /BIP	21.82%	÷1.032	×0.970	×1.038	×0.968	20.61%
Doubles /BIP	9.70%	÷0.890	×0.860	×1.038	×0.968	9.41%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.950	×1.038	×0.968	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.61%	÷1.140	×0.780	—	×0.968	0.40%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 106, 2B 78, 3B 80, K 98, BB 138 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.038.

Result: wOBA .299 → .263; ISO .092 → .086; BABIP .311 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAARound Rock Express · 247 PAwOBA .326 → .286 (−40)K% 18.2% → 22.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.22%	÷1.046	×1.290	—	—	22.46%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.53%	÷0.963	×0.710	—	×1.003	7.78%
HBP% /PA	0.81%	—	×0.980	—	×1.003	0.80%
Singles /BIP	22.94%	÷0.997	×0.900	×1.033	×1.003	21.47%
Doubles /BIP	8.82%	÷0.925	×0.810	×1.033	×1.003	8.01%
Triples /BIP	1.18%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.033	×1.003	0.86%
Home runs /BIP	1.18%	÷0.883	×0.780	—	×1.003	1.04%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 77, 1B 99, 2B 85, 3B 130, K 109, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.033.

Result: wOBA .326 → .286; ISO .116 → .102; BABIP .327 → .301. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAATucson Padres · 219 PAwOBA .356 → .297 (−59)K% 21.0% → 29.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.00%	÷0.935	×1.290	—	—	28.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.31%	÷0.997	×0.710	—	×1.018	5.30%
HBP% /PA	0.91%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.91%
Singles /BIP	29.61%	÷1.022	×0.900	×1.050	×1.018	27.86%
Doubles /BIP	11.18%	÷1.001	×0.810	×1.050	×1.018	9.67%
Triples /BIP	0.66%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.050	×1.018	0.57%
Home runs /BIP	0.66%	÷0.968	×0.780	—	×1.018	0.54%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 104, 2B 100, 3B 100, K 87, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .356 → .297; ISO .111 → .089; BABIP .412 → .378. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AASan Antonio Missions · 410 PAwOBA .323 → .297 (−26)K% 14.4% → 17.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.39%	÷0.996	×1.220	—	—	17.62%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.71%	÷0.984	×0.700	—	×0.998	8.31%
HBP% /PA	0.24%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	0.21%
Singles /BIP	27.42%	÷0.953	×0.920	×1.035	×0.998	27.33%
Doubles /BIP	5.35%	÷0.927	×0.840	×1.035	×0.998	5.01%
Triples /BIP	0.33%	÷1.129	×0.940	×1.035	×0.998	0.29%
Home runs /BIP	0.67%	÷0.869	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.61%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 91, 2B 85, 3B 126, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.035.

Result: wOBA .323 → .297; ISO .067 → .063; BABIP .331 → .326. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 A+Lake Elsinore Storm · 321 PAwOBA .356 → .299 (−57)K% 18.1% → 24.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.07%	÷1.000	×1.340	—	—	24.21%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.59%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×0.988	7.43%
HBP% /PA	2.18%	—	×0.790	—	×0.988	1.70%
Singles /BIP	27.03%	÷1.000	×0.910	×1.050	×0.988	25.51%
Doubles /BIP	9.01%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.050	×0.988	7.66%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.760	×1.050	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.80%	÷1.000	×0.920	—	×0.988	1.64%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .356 → .299; ISO .114 → .096; BABIP .367 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .