Gil Velazquez

Pos3B

B/TR/R

Born1979-10-17

Age (2027)47

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	33	AAA/INTL2 orgs	653	.256/.356/.305	2	4	70	—	.221/.291/.241
2014	34	AAA/INTL2 orgs	645	.307/.386/.374	3	4	93	—	.261/.325/.319
2015	35	INTLNaranjeros de…	189	.197/.304/.255	1	2	59	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	25	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	34	34	9	1	1	0	0	8	0	0	0	265	265	353	618	88	346	24	0	272	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	25	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	323	286	66	13	0	1	22	52	6	3	3	231	299	287	586	56	275	16	7	265	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	26	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	182	164	41	4	1	1	11	33	2	2	2	250	305	305	610	55	303	18	6	273	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	26	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	21	16	6	2	0	0	3	2	0	0	0	375	474	500	974	125	429	10	14	394	139	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	27	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	206	183	44	9	1	1	13	35	3	3	0	240	302	317	618	77	289	17	6	274	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	27	AA	New Britain Rock Cats	—	61	45	12	2	3	1	10	13	0	1	0	267	400	511	911	244	324	21	16	359	121	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	28	AAA	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	386	350	91	17	4	10	22	73	5	3	3	260	313	417	730	157	299	19	6	317	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	29	AAA	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	316	290	56	13	0	3	19	49	0	3	1	193	243	269	512	76	220	16	6	229	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	30	AAA	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	263	241	60	15	2	1	17	54	2	4	1	249	304	340	644	91	317	21	6	289	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	31	AAA	Salt Lake Bees	—	494	427	140	25	5	8	49	60	4	17	6	328	402	466	868	138	364	12	10	377	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	31	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	268	230	62	9	1	4	24	41	1	5	5	270	341	370	711	100	310	15	9	308	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	32	MLB	Miami Marlins	—	57	56	13	1	0	0	1	11	0	0	0	232	246	250	496	18	289	19	2	225	42	-4	+0	+1	+2	+1	0.0
2012	32	AAA	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	461	398	124	15	1	4	49	50	4	6	8	312	392	384	777	73	347	11	11	348	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	32	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	97	84	27	7	0	0	10	12	1	7	1	321	400	405	805	83	370	12	10	359	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	33	AAA	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	392	331	84	8	0	0	51	64	0	3	6	254	353	278	631	24	310	16	13	292	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	33	INTL	Mexico	—	261	219	57	11	1	2	34	38	0	1	3	260	360	347	707	87	302	15	13	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	34	AAA	Leones de Yucatan	—	425	361	104	16	1	3	49	48	2	3	3	288	376	363	739	75	325	11	12	330	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	34	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	220	192	66	10	0	0	18	27	2	1	2	344	406	396	801	52	400	12	8	352	125	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	35	INTL	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	189	157	31	4	1	1	22	26	2	2	2	197	304	255	559	57	229	14	12	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	57	56	13	1	0	0	1	11	0	0	0	232	246	250	496	18	289	19	2	225	39	-4	+0	+1	+2	+1	0.0
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	25	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	34	34	8	1	1	0	0	10	0	0	0	235	235	324	559	88	325	29	0	233	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	25	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	323	293	63	11	0	1	15	63	6	3	3	215	268	263	530	48	259	20	5	234	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	26	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	182	167	41	4	1	1	8	40	2	2	2	246	288	299	588	54	294	22	4	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	26	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	21	17	6	2	0	0	2	2	0	0	0	353	421	471	892	118	391	10	10	373	139	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	27	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	206	187	41	8	1	1	9	42	3	3	0	219	266	289	555	70	258	20	4	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	27	AA MLE	New Britain Rock Cats	—	61	48	13	2	3	1	7	16	0	1	0	271	364	500	864	229	298	26	11	347	121	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	28	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	386	357	81	14	4	8	15	88	5	3	3	227	268	356	624	129	267	23	4	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	29	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	316	296	47	10	0	2	13	59	0	3	1	159	194	213	407	54	187	19	4	185	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	30	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	263	247	50	11	2	1	11	65	2	4	1	202	242	275	518	73	270	25	4	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	31	AAA MLE	Salt Lake Bees	—	494	444	125	19	4	6	32	74	4	17	6	282	335	383	718	101	308	15	6	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	32	MLB MLE	Miami Marlins	—	57	56	13	1	0	0	1	11	0	0	0	232	246	250	496	18	289	19	2	230	42	-4	+0	+1	+2	+1	0.0
2012	32	AAA MLE	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	461	416	115	14	1	3	31	64	4	6	8	276	333	337	669	60	311	14	7	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	33	AAA MLE	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	392	348	77	7	0	0	34	82	0	3	6	221	291	241	532	20	273	21	9	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	34	AAA MLE	Leones de Yucatan	—	425	376	98	14	1	2	34	60	2	3	3	261	325	319	644	59	293	14	8	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	357	327	71	12	1	1	15	73	6	3	3	217	264	269	533	52	273	20	4	234	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	357	320	75	14	1	1	22	60	6	3	3	234	296	294	590	59	282	17	6	266	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	203	184	47	6	1	1	10	42	2	2	2	255	301	315	616	60	322	21	5	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	203	180	47	6	1	1	14	35	2	2	2	261	321	322	644	61	315	17	7	285	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	267	235	54	10	4	2	16	58	3	4	0	230	287	332	619	102	289	22	6	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	267	228	56	11	4	2	23	48	3	4	0	246	323	355	678	110	295	18	9	293	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	28	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	386	357	81	14	4	8	15	88	5	3	3	227	268	356	624	129	275	23	4	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	28	AAA RAW	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	386	350	91	17	4	10	22	73	5	3	3	260	313	417	730	157	299	19	6	317	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	29	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	316	296	47	10	0	2	13	59	0	3	1	159	194	213	407	54	189	19	4	185	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	29	AAA RAW	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	316	290	56	13	0	3	19	49	0	3	1	193	243	269	512	76	220	16	6	229	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	30	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	263	247	50	11	2	1	11	65	2	4	1	202	242	275	518	73	271	25	4	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	30	AAA RAW	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	263	241	60	15	2	1	17	54	2	4	1	249	304	340	644	91	317	21	6	289	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	762	681	190	29	5	9	49	114	5	22	11	279	332	376	708	97	321	15	6	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	31	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	762	657	202	34	6	12	73	101	5	22	11	307	381	432	813	125	345	13	10	353	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	32	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	615	560	153	18	1	4	38	89	5	13	9	273	325	330	655	57	317	14	6	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	32	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	615	538	164	23	1	4	60	73	5	13	9	305	380	374	753	69	345	12	10	338	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	653	578	127	11	0	0	57	136	0	4	9	220	290	239	529	19	283	21	9	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	33	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	653	550	141	19	1	2	85	102	0	4	9	256	356	305	661	49	307	16	13	302	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	645	568	149	21	1	3	52	90	4	4	5	262	329	319	647	56	307	14	8	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	34	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	645	553	170	26	1	3	67	75	4	4	5	307	386	374	761	67	351	12	10	337	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	35	INTL MLE	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	189	157	31	4	1	1	22	26	2	2	2	197	304	255	559	57	229	14	12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	35	INTL RAW	Naranjeros de Hermosillo	—	189	157	31	4	1	1	22	26	2	2	2	197	304	255	559	57	229	14	12	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	357	333	71	12	1	1	15	73	6	3	3	213	264	264	529	51	265	20	4	234	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	203	189	47	6	1	1	10	42	2	2	2	249	301	307	608	58	304	21	5	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	267	246	54	10	4	2	16	58	3	4	0	220	287	317	604	98	267	22	6	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	28	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	386	363	81	14	4	8	15	88	5	3	3	223	268	350	618	127	267	23	4	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	29	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	316	300	47	10	0	2	13	59	0	3	1	157	194	210	404	53	187	19	4	185	11	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	30	AAA MLE	Pawtucket Red Sox	—	263	248	50	11	2	1	11	65	2	4	1	202	242	274	517	73	270	25	4	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	762	702	190	29	5	9	49	114	5	22	11	271	332	365	697	94	308	15	6	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	32	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	615	567	153	18	1	4	38	89	5	13	9	270	325	326	651	56	309	14	6	289	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	653	591	127	11	0	0	57	136	0	4	9	215	290	234	523	19	273	21	9	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	645	584	149	21	1	3	52	90	4	4	5	255	329	310	638	55	293	14	8	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	57	56	13	1	0	0	1	11	0	0	0	232	246	250	496	18	289	19	2	225	58	-4	+0	+1	+2	+1	0.0
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	639	148	11	0	0	11	125	0	0	0	232	245	249	493	17	288	19	2	225	58	-47	+0	+9	+25	+14	0.1
Career	—	MLE		—	4656	4190	1000	146	20	32	298	840	34	64	46	239	295	306	601	67	289	18	6	253	58	-4	+0	+1	+2	+1	0.0
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	585	139	20	3	4	42	117	5	9	6	238	295	303	597	65	288	18	6	253	58	-47	+0	+9	+25	+14	0.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2014 AAALeones de Yucatan · 425 PAwOBA .322 → .282 (−40)K% 11.3% → 14.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.29%	÷0.971	×1.200	—	—	13.96%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.53%	÷0.921	×0.690	—	×0.940	8.12%
HBP% /PA	0.47%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.42%
Singles /BIP	26.84%	÷0.969	×0.930	×1.021	×0.940	24.72%
Doubles /BIP	5.11%	÷0.970	×0.830	×1.021	×0.940	4.20%
Triples /BIP	0.32%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.021	×0.940	0.25%
Home runs /BIP	0.96%	÷0.947	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.67%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 94, 2B 94, 3B 130, K 94, BB 84 — applied at half strength. Age: age 35 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.

Result: wOBA .322 → .282; ISO .075 → .061; BABIP .325 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAANew Orleans Zephyrs · 392 PAwOBA .288 → .242 (−46)K% 16.3% → 20.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.33%	÷1.009	×1.290	—	—	20.87%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.76%	÷0.963	×0.710	—	×0.940	8.84%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.980	—	×0.940	0.00%
Singles /BIP	28.46%	÷0.987	×0.900	×1.034	×0.940	25.25%
Doubles /BIP	3.00%	÷0.959	×0.810	×1.034	×0.940	2.46%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.936	×0.810	×1.034	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.400	×0.780	—	×0.940	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 180, 1B 97, 2B 92, 3B 87, K 102, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 34 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.034.

Result: wOBA .288 → .242; ISO .024 → .020; BABIP .310 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAANew Orleans Zephyrs · 461 PAwOBA .339 → .296 (−42)K% 10.8% → 13.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.85%	÷1.013	×1.290	—	—	13.81%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.98%	÷0.997	×0.710	—	×0.942	6.70%
HBP% /PA	0.87%	—	×0.980	—	×0.942	0.80%
Singles /BIP	29.89%	÷0.976	×0.900	×1.035	×0.942	26.86%
Doubles /BIP	4.31%	÷0.868	×0.810	×1.035	×0.942	3.92%
Triples /BIP	0.29%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.035	×0.942	0.20%
Home runs /BIP	1.15%	÷0.942	×0.780	—	×0.942	0.90%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 95, 2B 74, 3B 130, K 103, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 33 vs a level average of 27.2 → −5.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.035.

Result: wOBA .339 → .296; ISO .073 → .064; BABIP .347 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAASalt Lake Bees · 494 PAwOBA .369 → .306 (−63)K% 12.1% → 14.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.15%	÷1.050	×1.290	—	—	14.93%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.51%	÷1.007	×0.710	—	×0.952	6.39%
HBP% /PA	0.81%	—	×0.980	—	×0.952	0.76%
Singles /BIP	27.79%	÷0.968	×0.900	×1.009	×0.952	24.83%
Doubles /BIP	6.81%	÷1.072	×0.810	×1.009	×0.952	4.95%
Triples /BIP	1.36%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.009	×0.952	0.92%
Home runs /BIP	2.18%	÷1.089	×0.780	—	×0.952	1.49%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 94, 2B 114, 3B 130, K 110, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 32 vs a level average of 27.2 → −4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.

Result: wOBA .369 → .306; ISO .138 → .101; BABIP .364 → .308. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAPawtucket Red Sox · 263 PAwOBA .281 → .228 (−53)K% 20.5% → 24.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.53%	÷0.994	×1.200	—	—	24.78%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.46%	÷1.037	×0.690	—	×0.962	4.14%
HBP% /PA	0.76%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	0.69%
Singles /BIP	22.46%	÷1.016	×0.930	×0.992	×0.962	19.63%
Doubles /BIP	8.02%	÷1.030	×0.830	×0.992	×0.962	6.17%
Triples /BIP	1.07%	÷0.900	×0.970	×0.992	×0.962	1.10%
Home runs /BIP	0.53%	÷0.898	×0.840	—	×0.962	0.48%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 103, 2B 106, 3B 80, K 99, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .281 → .228; ISO .091 → .075; BABIP .317 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 AAAPawtucket Red Sox · 316 PAwOBA .225 → .185 (−41)K% 15.5% → 18.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.51%	÷1.000	×1.200	—	—	18.61%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.01%	÷1.000	×0.690	—	×0.972	4.03%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	0.00%
Singles /BIP	16.60%	÷1.000	×0.930	×0.967	×0.972	14.51%
Doubles /BIP	5.39%	÷1.000	×0.830	×0.967	×0.972	4.21%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.970	×0.967	×0.972	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.24%	÷1.000	×0.840	—	×0.972	1.02%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.967.

Result: wOBA .225 → .185; ISO .076 → .061; BABIP .220 → .187. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AAAPawtucket Red Sox · 386 PAwOBA .312 → .268 (−43)K% 18.9% → 22.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.91%	÷1.000	×1.200	—	—	22.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.70%	÷1.000	×0.690	—	×0.982	3.86%
HBP% /PA	1.30%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	1.20%
Singles /BIP	21.66%	÷1.000	×0.930	×1.005	×0.982	19.88%
Doubles /BIP	6.14%	÷1.000	×0.830	×1.005	×0.982	5.03%
Triples /BIP	1.44%	÷1.000	×0.970	×1.005	×0.982	1.38%
Home runs /BIP	3.61%	÷1.000	×0.840	—	×0.982	2.98%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.005.

Result: wOBA .312 → .268; ISO .157 → .133; BABIP .299 → .267. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2007 AAARochester Red Wings · 206 PAwOBA .269 → .236 (−34)K% 17.0% → 20.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.99%	÷1.000	×1.200	—	—	20.39%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.31%	÷1.000	×0.690	—	×0.992	4.32%
HBP% /PA	1.46%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	1.36%
Singles /BIP	22.30%	÷1.000	×0.930	×0.989	×0.992	20.35%
Doubles /BIP	6.08%	÷1.000	×0.830	×0.989	×0.992	4.95%
Triples /BIP	0.68%	÷1.000	×0.970	×0.989	×0.992	0.64%
Home runs /BIP	0.68%	÷1.000	×0.840	—	×0.992	0.56%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.

Result: wOBA .269 → .236; ISO .077 → .066; BABIP .289 → .258. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .