Luis Mauricio Suarez

PosLF

B/TL/L

Born1979-06-09

Age (2027)48

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2017

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2015	36	AAAToros de Tiju…	270	.242/.305/.389	8	2	39	—	.188/.237/.276
2016	37	AAAPericos de Pu…	258	.242/.320/.313	3	1	32	—	.192/.237/.238
2017	38	AAARojos del Agu…	317	.276/.366/.364	3	3	69	—	.239/.290/.307

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	26	AAA	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	333	293	98	15	4	17	23	45	8	5	1	334	398	587	985	253	345	14	7	418	126	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	27	AAA	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	308	275	105	19	2	9	25	33	0	4	2	382	433	564	997	182	407	11	8	427	134	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	28	AAA	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	404	347	104	20	2	11	45	48	5	9	5	300	388	464	852	164	321	12	11	374	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	29	AAA	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	328	279	81	14	1	6	32	57	3	2	9	290	368	412	780	122	336	17	10	338	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	30	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	402	364	112	25	1	7	29	46	4	3	4	308	365	440	805	132	335	11	7	356	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	31	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	390	338	122	23	1	8	39	36	3	2	2	361	432	506	937	145	381	9	10	407	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	31	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	98	86	27	5	1	0	9	22	2	0	1	314	392	395	787	81	422	22	9	355	126	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	32	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	423	368	118	19	0	4	45	47	0	1	0	321	395	405	800	84	358	11	11	355	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	32	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	216	198	50	8	0	4	9	35	1	1	3	253	287	354	641	101	284	16	4	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	33	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	453	404	129	28	0	13	37	76	3	4	7	319	381	485	866	166	366	17	8	377	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	33	INTL	Caneros de los Mochis	—	197	172	43	8	0	2	18	44	0	2	2	250	321	331	652	81	323	22	9	289	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	34	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	420	351	145	27	2	6	52	46	3	5	5	413	493	553	1.045	140	454	11	12	449	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	34	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	172	145	35	4	1	1	22	25	0	0	0	241	341	303	645	62	279	15	13	293	85	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	35	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	422	376	116	31	3	4	37	56	2	3	4	309	373	439	812	130	350	13	9	357	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	35	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	22	19	4	0	0	0	3	4	0	0	0	211	318	211	529		267	18	14	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	36	AAA	Toros de Tijuana	—	270	244	59	8	2	8	18	42	4	2	2	242	305	389	694	148	259	16	7	306	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	37	AAA	Pericos de Puebla	—	258	227	55	7	0	3	26	24	0	1	3	242	320	313	633	70	257	9	10	287	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	38	AAA	Rojos del Aguila de Veracruz	—	317	275	76	13	1	3	36	38	3	3	1	276	366	364	730	87	312	12	11	332	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	26	AAA MLE	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	333	302	90	13	4	13	14	54	8	5	1	298	346	497	842	199	310	16	4	355	126	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	27	AAA MLE	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	308	286	97	16	2	7	14	40	0	4	2	339	370	483	853	143	362	13	5	366	134	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	28	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	404	365	94	17	2	8	27	58	5	9	5	258	317	381	698	123	279	14	7	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	29	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	328	292	74	12	1	4	20	69	3	2	9	253	308	342	650	89	291	21	6	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	30	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	402	376	98	20	1	5	17	55	4	3	4	261	300	359	659	98	289	14	4	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	31	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	390	351	98	17	1	5	26	50	3	2	2	279	334	376	710	97	298	13	7	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	32	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	423	385	107	15	0	3	28	59	0	1	0	278	327	340	667	62	313	14	7	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	33	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	453	421	104	20	0	8	20	95	3	4	7	247	286	352	638	105	293	21	4	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	34	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	420	373	125	23	2	4	30	61	3	5	5	335	389	440	829	105	369	15	7	359	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	35	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	422	395	92	22	2	3	18	73	2	3	4	233	270	322	591	89	273	17	4	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	36	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	270	250	47	6	2	4	12	52	4	2	2	188	237	276	513	88	213	19	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	37	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	258	239	46	5	0	2	14	31	0	1	3	192	237	238	476	46	208	12	5	215	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	38	AAA MLE	Rojos del Aguila de Veracruz	—	317	293	70	12	1	2	18	42	3	3	1	239	290	307	597	68	269	13	6	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	26	AAA MLE	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	333	302	90	13	4	13	14	54	8	5	1	298	346	497	842	199	322	16	4	355	126	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	26	AAA RAW	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	333	293	98	15	4	17	23	45	8	5	1	334	398	587	985	253	345	14	7	418	126	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	27	AAA MLE	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	308	286	97	16	2	7	14	40	0	4	2	339	370	483	853	143	372	13	5	366	134	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	27	AAA RAW	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	308	275	105	19	2	9	25	33	0	4	2	382	433	564	997	182	407	11	8	427	134	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	28	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	404	365	94	17	2	8	27	58	5	9	5	258	317	381	698	123	286	14	7	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	28	AAA RAW	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	404	347	104	20	2	11	45	48	5	9	5	300	388	464	852	164	321	12	11	374	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	29	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	328	292	74	12	1	4	20	69	3	2	9	253	308	342	650	89	310	21	6	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	29	AAA RAW	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	328	279	81	14	1	6	32	57	3	2	9	290	368	412	780	122	336	17	10	338	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	30	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	402	376	98	20	1	5	17	55	4	3	4	261	300	359	659	98	292	14	4	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	30	AAA RAW	Pericos de Puebla	—	402	364	112	25	1	7	29	46	4	3	4	308	365	440	805	132	335	11	7	356	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	488	440	122	22	1	6	32	62	5	2	3	277	333	373	706	95	308	13	7	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	31	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	488	424	149	28	2	8	48	58	5	2	3	351	423	483	907	132	388	12	10	396	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	32	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	639	579	162	23	0	4	42	89	1	2	3	280	330	340	670	60	322	14	7	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	32	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	639	566	168	27	0	8	54	82	1	2	3	297	359	387	745	90	333	13	8	329	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	650	602	150	29	0	12	29	136	3	6	9	249	287	357	644	108	302	21	4	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	33	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	650	576	172	36	0	15	55	120	3	6	9	299	363	439	802	141	354	18	8	350	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	592	527	177	33	2	6	43	86	3	5	5	336	389	440	829	104	384	15	7	359	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	34	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	592	496	180	31	3	7	74	71	3	5	5	363	449	480	928	117	404	12	12	403	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	35	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	444	416	98	24	2	3	19	77	2	3	4	236	272	325	597	89	279	17	4	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	35	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	444	395	120	31	3	4	40	60	2	3	4	304	371	428	799	124	346	14	9	353	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	36	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	270	250	47	6	2	4	12	52	4	2	2	188	237	276	513	88	218	19	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	36	AAA RAW	Toros de Tijuana	—	270	244	59	8	2	8	18	42	4	2	2	242	305	389	694	148	259	16	7	306	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	37	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	258	239	46	5	0	2	14	31	0	1	3	192	237	238	476	46	212	12	5	215	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	37	AAA RAW	Pericos de Puebla	—	258	227	55	7	0	3	26	24	0	1	3	242	320	313	633	70	257	9	10	287	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	38	AAA MLE	Rojos del Aguila de Veracruz	—	317	293	70	12	1	2	18	42	3	3	1	239	290	307	597	68	273	13	6	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	38	AAA RAW	Rojos del Aguila de Veracruz	—	317	275	76	13	1	3	36	38	3	3	1	276	366	364	730	87	312	12	11	332	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	26	AAA MLE	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	333	308	90	13	4	13	14	54	8	5	1	292	346	487	833	195	310	16	4	355	126	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	27	AAA MLE	Tigres de la Angelopolis	—	308	291	97	16	2	7	14	40	0	4	2	333	370	474	844	141	362	13	5	366	134	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	28	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	404	369	94	17	2	8	27	58	5	9	5	255	317	377	694	122	279	14	7	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	29	AAA MLE	Tigres de Quintana Roo	—	328	302	74	12	1	4	20	69	3	2	9	245	308	331	639	86	291	21	6	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	30	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	402	378	98	20	1	5	17	55	4	3	4	259	300	357	657	98	289	14	4	288	81	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	31	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	488	448	122	22	1	6	32	62	5	2	3	272	333	366	699	94	298	13	7	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	32	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	639	591	162	23	0	4	42	89	1	2	3	274	330	333	663	59	313	14	7	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	33	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	650	613	150	29	0	12	29	136	3	6	9	245	287	351	638	106	293	21	4	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	592	541	177	33	2	6	43	86	3	5	5	327	389	429	818	102	369	15	7	359	129	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	35	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	444	420	98	24	2	3	19	77	2	3	4	233	272	321	594	88	273	17	4	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	36	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	270	252	47	6	2	4	12	52	4	2	2	187	237	274	511	87	213	19	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	37	AAA MLE	Pericos de Puebla	—	258	242	46	5	0	2	14	31	0	1	3	190	237	236	473	45	208	12	5	215	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	38	AAA MLE	Rojos del Aguila de Veracruz	—	317	293	70	12	1	2	18	42	3	3	1	239	290	307	597	68	269	13	6	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	5433	4967	1325	232	18	76	301	851	41	47	51	267	314	367	681	100	305	16	6	297	87	-84	-11	+0	-58	+118	-3.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	594	159	28	2	9	36	102	5	6	6	268	315	367	682	99	307	16	6	297	87	-10	-1	+0	-7	+14	-0.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAARojos del Aguila de Veracruz · 317 PAwOBA .316 → .270 (−46)K% 12.0% → 13.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.99%	÷1.095	×1.200	—	—	13.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.15%	÷1.043	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.69%
HBP% /PA	0.95%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.84%
Singles /BIP	24.89%	÷0.988	×0.930	×0.980	×0.940	21.60%
Doubles /BIP	5.49%	÷0.899	×0.830	×0.980	×0.940	4.67%
Triples /BIP	0.42%	÷0.900	×0.920	×0.980	×0.940	0.40%
Home runs /BIP	1.27%	÷0.929	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.90%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 98, 2B 80, 3B 80, K 119, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 38 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (10.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.980.

Result: wOBA .316 → .270; ISO .087 → .075; BABIP .312 → .269. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAAPericos de Puebla · 258 PAwOBA .277 → .215 (−63)K% 9.3% → 12.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.30%	÷0.921	×1.200	—	—	12.12%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.91%	÷1.091	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.30%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.17%	÷1.048	×0.930	×0.989	×0.940	18.30%
Doubles /BIP	3.45%	÷1.075	×0.830	×0.989	×0.940	2.47%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.008	×0.920	×0.989	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.48%	÷1.024	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.95%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 110, 2B 115, 3B 102, K 84, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 37 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (9.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.

Result: wOBA .277 → .215; ISO .070 → .050; BABIP .257 → .208. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAAToros de Tijuana · 270 PAwOBA .302 → .226 (−75)K% 15.6% → 19.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.56%	÷0.978	×1.200	—	—	19.09%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.67%	÷1.013	×0.690	—	×0.940	4.27%
HBP% /PA	1.48%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	1.31%
Singles /BIP	20.30%	÷0.982	×0.930	×0.965	×0.940	17.42%
Doubles /BIP	3.96%	÷1.026	×0.830	×0.965	×0.940	2.91%
Triples /BIP	0.99%	÷1.046	×0.920	×0.965	×0.940	0.79%
Home runs /BIP	3.96%	÷1.208	×0.700	—	×0.940	2.16%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 142, 1B 96, 2B 105, 3B 109, K 96, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 36 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (8.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.

Result: wOBA .302 → .226; ISO .148 → .091; BABIP .259 → .213. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAPericos de Puebla · 422 PAwOBA .346 → .264 (−82)K% 13.3% → 17.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.27%	÷0.914	×1.200	—	—	17.43%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.11%	÷1.071	×0.690	—	×0.940	4.30%
HBP% /PA	0.47%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.42%
Singles /BIP	24.38%	÷1.068	×0.930	×0.998	×0.940	19.91%
Doubles /BIP	9.69%	÷1.108	×0.830	×0.998	×0.940	6.81%
Triples /BIP	0.94%	÷1.150	×0.920	×0.998	×0.940	0.70%
Home runs /BIP	1.25%	÷0.957	×0.700	—	×0.940	0.86%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 114, 2B 122, 3B 130, K 83, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 35 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.

Result: wOBA .346 → .264; ISO .130 → .094; BABIP .350 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAPericos de Puebla · 420 PAwOBA .443 → .359 (−84)K% 11.0% → 14.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	10.95%	÷0.905	×1.200	—	—	14.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.67%	÷1.047	×0.690	—	×0.940	7.23%
HBP% /PA	0.71%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	0.63%
Singles /BIP	36.07%	÷1.081	×0.930	×1.014	×0.940	29.58%
Doubles /BIP	8.85%	÷0.984	×0.830	×1.014	×0.940	7.12%
Triples /BIP	0.66%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.014	×0.940	0.50%
Home runs /BIP	1.97%	÷1.055	×0.700	—	×0.940	1.23%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 111, 1B 116, 2B 97, 3B 130, K 81, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 34 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.

Result: wOBA .443 → .359; ISO .140 → .110; BABIP .454 → .369. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAAPericos de Puebla · 453 PAwOBA .365 → .278 (−87)K% 16.8% → 21.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.78%	÷0.957	×1.200	—	—	21.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.28%	÷1.070	×0.690	—	×0.942	4.43%
HBP% /PA	0.66%	—	×0.940	—	×0.942	0.59%
Singles /BIP	26.83%	÷1.002	×0.930	×0.970	×0.942	22.74%
Doubles /BIP	8.54%	÷1.085	×0.830	×0.970	×0.942	5.96%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	×0.970	×0.942	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.96%	÷1.044	×0.700	—	×0.942	2.50%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 100, 2B 117, 3B 130, K 91, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 33 vs a level average of 27.2 → −5.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.970.

Result: wOBA .365 → .278; ISO .166 → .112; BABIP .366 → .293. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAPericos de Puebla · 423 PAwOBA .347 → .290 (−56)K% 11.1% → 13.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	11.11%	÷0.956	×1.200	—	—	13.95%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.64%	÷1.064	×0.690	—	×0.952	6.57%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.952	0.00%
Singles /BIP	29.60%	÷1.012	×0.930	×1.025	×0.952	26.55%
Doubles /BIP	5.92%	÷1.040	×0.830	×1.025	×0.952	4.61%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.025	×0.952	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.25%	÷1.013	×0.700	—	×0.952	0.82%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 102, 2B 108, 3B 130, K 91, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 32 vs a level average of 27.2 → −4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.

Result: wOBA .347 → .290; ISO .084 → .065; BABIP .358 → .313. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAPericos de Puebla · 390 PAwOBA .401 → .309 (−92)K% 9.2% → 12.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	9.23%	÷0.874	×1.200	—	—	12.68%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.74%	÷0.982	×0.690	—	×0.962	6.58%
HBP% /PA	0.77%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	0.70%
Singles /BIP	29.80%	÷1.098	×0.930	×0.985	×0.962	23.93%
Doubles /BIP	7.62%	÷1.076	×0.830	×0.985	×0.962	5.57%
Triples /BIP	0.33%	÷1.150	×0.920	×0.985	×0.962	0.25%
Home runs /BIP	2.65%	÷1.094	×0.700	—	×0.962	1.63%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 120, 2B 115, 3B 130, K 75, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.985.

Result: wOBA .401 → .309; ISO .145 → .101; BABIP .381 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .