John Lindsey

Pos1B

B/TR/R

Born1977-01-30

Age (2027)50

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2013	36	AAA/INTL2 orgs	410	.259/.357/.548	29	93	—	.209/.297/.421
2014	37	AAA/INTL2 orgs	592	.296/.400/.624	45	107	—	.207/.295/.391
2015	38	AAA/INTL2 orgs	138	.208/.296/.325	4	45	—	.224/.307/.328

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	28	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	111	96	21	8	0	1	11	22	4	0	0	219	324	333	658	115	274	20	10	305	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	30	AAA	Las Vegas 51s	—	333	300	100	26	1	19	21	56	10	0	0	333	396	617	1.012	283	357	17	6	437	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	30	AA	Jacksonville Suns	—	174	154	44	6	0	11	14	38	6	0	0	286	368	539	907	253	314	22	8	398	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	31	AAA	Las Vegas 51s	—	563	481	152	36	1	26	63	82	14	0	0	316	410	557	968	241	333	15	11	420	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	32	AAA	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	502	443	111	22	1	19	38	112	17	1	2	251	333	433	767	183	291	22	8	340	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	33	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	447	408	144	41	4	25	19	78	16	0	0	353	404	657	1.061	304	385	17	4	454	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	34	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	270	230	71	15	0	13	28	59	10	0	0	309	407	543	950	235	362	22	10	415	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	34	INTL	Venados de Mazatlan	—	120	103	27	7	0	2	13	24	4	0	0	262	367	388	755	126	325	20	11	345	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	35	AAA	Toledo Mud Hens	—	601	520	161	37	0	36	56	126	19	1	1	310	397	588	985	279	343	21	9	424	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	35	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	77	66	21	2	0	4	9	22	2	0	0	318	416	530	946	212	425	29	12	418	169	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	36	AAA	Piratas de Campeche	—	315	269	73	11	1	24	29	88	15	0	1	271	374	587	961	316	308	28	9	414	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	36	INTL	Mayos de Navojoa	—	95	83	18	2	0	5	6	25	4	0	0	217	301	422	723	205	236	26	6	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	37	AAA	Diablos Rojos del Mexico	—	445	372	114	27	0	33	52	97	16	0	1	306	414	645	1.059	339	328	22	12	450	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	37	INTL	Mayos de Navojoa	—	147	128	34	2	0	12	11	43	8	0	0	266	361	562	923	297	301	29	7	403	159	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	38	AAA	Toros de Tijuana	—	76	65	17	1	0	3	5	17	5	0	0	262	360	415	775	154	304	22	7	348	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	38	INTL	Mayos de Navojoa	—	62	55	8	1	0	1	2	22	3	0	0	145	217	218	435	73	206	35	3	200	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	28	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	111	99	18	7	0	1	8	31	4	0	0	182	270	283	553	101	255	28	7	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	30	AAA MLE	Las Vegas 51s	—	333	307	84	21	1	14	14	72	10	0	0	274	326	485	812	212	310	22	4	346	120	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	30	AA MLE	Jacksonville Suns	—	174	162	37	5	0	8	6	46	6	0	0	228	282	407	689	179	272	26	3	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	31	AAA MLE	Las Vegas 51s	—	563	502	133	30	1	20	42	106	14	0	0	265	339	448	787	183	289	19	7	338	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	32	AAA MLE	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	502	457	90	17	1	14	24	145	17	1	2	197	263	330	593	133	245	29	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	33	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	447	414	105	29	3	14	13	105	16	0	0	254	302	440	742	186	295	23	3	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	34	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	270	240	51	11	0	8	18	82	10	0	0	212	295	358	653	146	276	30	7	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	35	AAA MLE	Toledo Mud Hens	—	601	542	133	28	0	31	34	159	19	1	1	245	313	469	781	223	279	26	6	335	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	36	AAA MLE	Piratas de Campeche	—	315	278	58	9	1	16	20	106	15	0	1	209	297	421	718	212	256	34	6	302	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	37	AAA MLE	Diablos Rojos del Mexico	—	445	391	81	18	0	18	33	125	16	0	1	207	295	391	687	184	244	28	7	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	38	AAA MLE	Toros de Tijuana	—	76	67	15	1	0	2	3	21	5	0	0	224	307	328	635	104	264	28	4	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	28	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	111	99	18	7	0	1	8	31	4	0	0	182	270	283	553	101	254	28	7	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	28	A+ RAW	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	111	96	21	8	0	1	11	22	4	0	0	219	324	333	658	115	274	20	10	305	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	507	469	121	26	1	22	20	119	16	0	0	258	311	458	769	200	300	23	4	333	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	30	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	507	454	144	32	1	30	35	94	16	0	0	317	386	590	976	273	343	19	7	423	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	31	AAA MLE	Las Vegas 51s	—	563	502	133	30	1	20	42	106	14	0	0	265	339	448	787	183	297	19	7	338	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	31	AAA RAW	Las Vegas 51s	—	563	481	152	36	1	26	63	82	14	0	0	316	410	557	968	241	333	15	11	420	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	32	AAA MLE	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	502	457	90	17	1	14	24	145	17	1	2	197	263	330	593	133	252	29	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	32	AAA RAW	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	502	443	111	22	1	19	38	112	17	1	2	251	333	433	767	183	291	22	8	340	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	33	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	447	414	105	29	3	14	13	105	16	0	0	254	302	440	742	186	304	23	3	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	33	AAA RAW	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	447	408	144	41	4	25	19	78	16	0	0	353	404	657	1.061	304	385	17	4	454	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	390	348	73	16	0	11	26	119	14	0	0	210	291	351	642	141	282	31	7	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	34	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	390	333	98	22	0	15	41	83	14	0	0	294	394	495	890	201	350	21	11	394	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	35	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	678	613	150	32	0	35	38	179	21	1	1	245	311	468	779	223	284	26	6	335	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	35	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	678	586	182	39	0	40	65	148	21	1	1	311	399	582	981	271	351	22	10	424	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	36	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	410	362	74	11	1	20	25	138	19	0	1	204	291	406	697	202	260	34	6	302	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	36	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	410	352	91	13	1	29	35	113	19	0	1	259	357	548	905	290	290	28	9	391	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	37	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	592	519	108	24	0	24	44	166	24	0	1	208	300	393	693	185	251	28	7	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	37	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	592	500	148	29	0	45	63	140	24	0	1	296	400	624	1.024	328	322	24	11	438	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	38	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	138	121	25	1	0	3	6	38	8	0	0	207	289	289	578	83	265	28	4	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	38	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	138	120	25	2	0	4	7	39	8	0	0	208	296	325	621	117	263	28	5	282	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	28	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	111	98	18	7	0	1	8	31	4	0	0	184	270	286	556	102	255	28	7	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	30	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	507	466	121	26	1	22	20	119	16	0	0	260	311	461	772	202	297	23	4	333	112	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	31	AAA MLE	Las Vegas 51s	—	563	502	133	30	1	20	42	106	14	0	0	265	339	448	787	183	289	19	7	338	115	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	32	AAA MLE	New Orleans Zephyrs	—	502	456	90	17	1	14	24	145	17	1	2	197	263	331	594	134	245	29	5	259	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	33	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	447	415	105	29	3	14	13	105	16	0	0	253	302	439	741	186	295	23	3	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	34	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	390	347	73	16	0	11	26	119	14	0	0	210	291	352	643	141	276	31	7	285	79	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	35	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	678	614	150	32	0	35	38	179	21	1	1	244	311	467	778	223	279	26	6	335	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	36	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	410	363	74	11	1	20	25	138	19	0	1	204	291	405	696	201	256	34	6	302	91	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	37	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	592	519	108	24	0	24	44	166	24	0	1	208	300	393	693	185	244	28	7	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	38	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	138	123	25	1	0	3	6	38	8	0	0	203	289	285	573	81	264	28	4	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4338	3904	897	193	7	164	246	1146	153	2	5	230	301	409	710	179	279	26	6	308	94	-30	-2	-0	-77	+94	-1.5
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	585	135	29	1	25	37	172	23	0	1	231	302	412	714	181	280	26	6	308	94	-4	-0	-0	-12	+14	-0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAAToros de Tijuana · 76 PAwOBA .343 → .264 (−79)K% 22.4% → 27.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.37%	÷0.978	×1.200	—	—	27.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.58%	÷1.013	×0.690	—	×0.940	4.21%
HBP% /PA	6.58%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	5.81%
Singles /BIP	27.08%	÷0.982	×0.930	×1.013	×0.940	24.41%
Doubles /BIP	2.08%	÷1.026	×0.830	×1.013	×0.940	1.61%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.046	×0.920	×1.013	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	6.25%	÷1.208	×0.700	—	×0.940	3.41%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 142, 1B 96, 2B 105, 3B 109, K 96, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 38 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (10.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.013.

Result: wOBA .343 → .264; ISO .154 → .086; BABIP .304 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAADiablos Rojos del Mexico · 445 PAwOBA .442 → .301 (−141)K% 21.8% → 28.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.80%	÷0.931	×1.200	—	—	28.10%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.46%	÷0.991	×0.690	—	×0.940	7.50%
HBP% /PA	3.60%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	3.18%
Singles /BIP	19.64%	÷1.039	×0.930	×1.010	×0.940	16.68%
Doubles /BIP	9.82%	÷1.183	×0.830	×1.010	×0.940	6.54%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.010	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	12.00%	÷1.180	×0.700	—	×0.940	6.69%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 136, 1B 108, 2B 137, 3B 130, K 86, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 37 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (9.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.010.

Result: wOBA .442 → .301; ISO .339 → .195; BABIP .328 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 315 PAwOBA .405 → .302 (−103)K% 27.9% → 33.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.94%	÷0.996	×1.200	—	—	33.65%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.21%	÷0.959	×0.690	—	×0.940	6.23%
HBP% /PA	4.76%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	4.21%
Singles /BIP	20.44%	÷0.990	×0.930	×1.015	×0.940	18.33%
Doubles /BIP	6.08%	÷0.994	×0.830	×1.015	×0.940	4.84%
Triples /BIP	0.55%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.015	×0.940	0.42%
Home runs /BIP	13.26%	÷0.988	×0.700	—	×0.940	8.83%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 98, 2B 99, 3B 130, K 99, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 36 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (8.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.

Result: wOBA .405 → .302; ISO .316 → .211; BABIP .308 → .256. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2012 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 601 PAwOBA .415 → .335 (−80)K% 21.0% → 26.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.97%	÷0.952	×1.200	—	—	26.43%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.49%	÷0.988	×0.690	—	×0.940	5.57%
HBP% /PA	3.16%	—	×0.940	—	×0.940	2.79%
Singles /BIP	22.34%	÷1.045	×0.930	×1.007	×0.940	18.81%
Doubles /BIP	9.39%	÷1.015	×0.830	×1.007	×0.940	7.27%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.970	×1.007	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	9.14%	÷0.913	×0.840	—	×0.940	7.90%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 83, 1B 109, 2B 103, 3B 80, K 90, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 35 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (7.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.

Result: wOBA .415 → .335; ISO .279 → .233; BABIP .343 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 270 PAwOBA .406 → .285 (−121)K% 21.9% → 30.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.85%	÷0.928	×1.290	—	—	30.39%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.00%	÷1.012	×0.710	—	×0.940	6.59%
HBP% /PA	3.70%	—	×0.980	—	×0.940	3.41%
Singles /BIP	25.15%	÷1.096	×0.900	×1.025	×0.940	19.90%
Doubles /BIP	8.77%	÷1.012	×0.810	×1.025	×0.940	6.76%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.025	×0.940	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	7.60%	÷1.173	×0.780	—	×0.940	4.75%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 135, 1B 119, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 86, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 34 vs a level average of 27.2 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.

Result: wOBA .406 → .285; ISO .235 → .147; BABIP .362 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 447 PAwOBA .445 → .315 (−130)K% 17.4% → 23.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.45%	÷0.961	×1.290	—	—	23.42%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.25%	÷1.019	×0.710	—	×0.942	2.79%
HBP% /PA	3.58%	—	×0.980	—	×0.942	3.30%
Singles /BIP	22.42%	÷1.056	×0.900	×1.034	×0.942	18.61%
Doubles /BIP	12.42%	÷1.082	×0.810	×1.034	×0.942	9.06%
Triples /BIP	1.21%	÷1.053	×0.810	×1.034	×0.942	0.91%
Home runs /BIP	7.58%	÷1.223	×0.780	—	×0.942	4.55%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 145, 1B 111, 2B 116, 3B 111, K 92, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 33 vs a level average of 27.2 → −5.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.034.

Result: wOBA .445 → .315; ISO .304 → .189; BABIP .385 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 AAANew Orleans Zephyrs · 502 PAwOBA .332 → .259 (−74)K% 22.3% → 28.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.31%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	28.78%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.17%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×0.952	4.85%
HBP% /PA	3.39%	—	×0.980	—	×0.952	3.16%
Singles /BIP	20.85%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.023	×0.952	18.27%
Doubles /BIP	6.65%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.023	×0.952	5.24%
Triples /BIP	0.30%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.023	×0.952	0.24%
Home runs /BIP	5.74%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.952	4.26%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 32 vs a level average of 27.2 → −4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.023.

Result: wOBA .332 → .259; ISO .183 → .133; BABIP .291 → .245. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AAALas Vegas 51s · 563 PAwOBA .412 → .338 (−74)K% 14.6% → 18.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.56%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	18.79%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.83%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×0.962	7.40%
HBP% /PA	2.49%	—	×0.980	—	×0.962	2.34%
Singles /BIP	22.31%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.050	×0.962	20.28%
Doubles /BIP	9.02%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.050	×0.962	7.38%
Triples /BIP	0.25%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.050	×0.962	0.21%
Home runs /BIP	6.52%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.962	4.89%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .412 → .338; ISO .241 → .188; BABIP .333 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .