John Bowker

Pos1B

B/TL/L

Born1983-07-08

Age (2027)44

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2015

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2011	28	AAAPIT	451	.306/.350/.482	15	2	100	—	.274/.305/.426
2011	28	MLBPHI	32	.133/.188/.167	0	0	-14	-0.9
2014	31	AAAPiratas de Ca…	89	.300/.364/.450	1	0	82	—	.265/.307/.398
2015	32	AAAPIT	355	.237/.267/.361	9	1	34	—	.189/.207/.291
2016	33	No MLB games played
2017	34	No MLB games played
2018	35	No MLB games played
2019	36	No MLB games played
2020	37	No MLB games played
2021	38	No MLB games played
2022	39	No MLB games played
2023	40	No MLB games played
2024	41	No MLB games played
2025	42	No MLB games played
2026	43	No MLB games played

Last 3 seasons WAR -0.9

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2005	22	A+	San Jose Giants	—	513	464	124	27	1	13	36	108	3	3	7	267	324	414	738	147	316	21	7	323	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+	San Jose Giants	—	511	462	131	32	6	7	37	100	2	6	3	284	339	424	764	141	346	20	7	334	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AA	Connecticut Defenders	—	587	522	160	35	6	22	41	103	12	3	7	307	370	523	893	216	337	18	7	384	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	MLB	San Francisco Giants	—	350	326	83	14	3	10	19	74	3	1	1	255	302	408	710	153	299	21	5	314	97	-1	-0	-9	-8	+8	-1.1
2008	25	AAA	Fresno Grizzlies	—	102	93	23	3	1	2	7	21	2	3	0	247	314	366	679	118	300	21	7	308	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	MLB	San Francisco Giants	—	73	67	13	2	2	2	4	18	1	1	0	194	250	373	623	179	229	25	5	272	70	-3	+0	+2	-6	+2	-0.5
2009	26	AAA	Fresno Grizzlies	—	450	366	125	22	4	21	74	64	4	10	6	342	457	596	1.053	254	362	14	16	452	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	MLB	Pittsburgh Pirates	—	167	151	33	8	0	5	14	33	0	0	1	219	285	371	656	152	243	20	8	291	79	-4	-0	-3	-5	+4	-0.9
2010	27	AAA	Indianapolis Indians	—	322	288	90	19	3	18	29	57	4	1	2	312	383	587	970	274	336	18	9	420	109	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	MLB	Philadelphia Phillies	—	32	30	4	1	0	0	2	11	0	0	1	133	188	167	354	33	211	34	6	169	-14	-4	-0	+0	-5	+1	-0.9
2011	28	AAA	Indianapolis Indians	—	451	421	129	27	1	15	27	73	1	2	3	306	350	482	832	176	340	16	6	366	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA	Piratas de Campeche	—	89	80	24	7	1	1	8	12	0	0	0	300	364	450	814	150	338	13	9	358	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA	Indianapolis Indians	—	355	338	80	15	0	9	13	67	1	1	2	237	267	361	628	124	268	19	4	277	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	622	574	133	25	5	17	39	136	4	2	3	232	285	382	667	150	272	22	6	295	86	-10	-1	-10	-24	+13	-3.2
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2005	22	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	513	474	110	22	1	12	26	145	3	3	7	232	276	359	635	127	289	28	5	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	511	475	115	26	5	6	24	134	2	6	3	242	281	356	637	114	311	26	5	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AA MLE	Connecticut Defenders	—	587	535	152	31	6	18	28	126	12	3	7	284	334	465	799	181	320	21	5	339	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	MLB MLE	San Francisco Giants	—	350	327	83	14	3	10	18	74	3	1	1	254	299	407	706	153	299	21	5	312	97	-1	-0	-9	-8	+8	-1.1
2008	25	AAA MLE	Fresno Grizzlies	—	102	95	20	2	1	2	5	27	2	3	0	211	265	316	580	105	278	26	5	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	MLB MLE	San Francisco Giants	—	73	67	13	2	2	2	4	18	1	1	0	194	250	373	623	179	229	25	5	272	70	-3	+0	+2	-6	+2	-0.5
2009	26	AAA MLE	Fresno Grizzlies	—	450	391	116	19	4	17	49	82	4	10	6	297	381	496	877	199	325	18	11	383	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	MLB MLE	Pittsburgh Pirates	—	167	153	33	8	0	5	12	33	0	0	1	216	273	366	639	150	243	20	7	285	79	-4	-0	-3	-5	+4	-0.9
2010	27	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	322	300	75	16	2	14	17	71	4	1	2	250	299	457	756	207	280	22	5	330	109	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	MLB MLE	Philadelphia Phillies	—	32	31	4	1	0	0	1	11	0	0	1	129	156	161	318	32	211	34	3	147	-14	-4	-0	+0	-5	+1	-0.9
2011	28	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	451	430	118	24	1	13	18	88	1	2	3	274	305	426	731	151	317	20	4	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA MLE	Piratas de Campeche	—	89	83	22	6	1	1	5	14	0	0	0	265	307	398	704	133	296	16	6	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	355	344	65	11	0	8	7	82	1	1	2	189	207	291	498	102	220	23	2	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	513	474	110	22	1	12	26	145	3	3	7	232	276	359	635	127	302	28	5	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ RAW	San Jose Giants	—	513	464	124	27	1	13	36	108	3	3	7	267	324	414	738	147	316	21	7	323	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	511	475	115	26	5	6	24	134	2	6	3	242	281	356	637	114	322	26	5	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ RAW	San Jose Giants	—	511	462	131	32	6	7	37	100	2	6	3	284	339	424	764	141	346	20	7	334	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AA MLE	Connecticut Defenders	—	587	535	152	31	6	18	28	126	12	3	7	284	334	465	799	181	333	21	5	339	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AA RAW	Connecticut Defenders	—	587	522	160	35	6	22	41	103	12	3	7	307	370	523	893	216	337	18	7	384	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	452	422	103	16	4	12	23	101	5	4	1	244	291	386	677	142	293	22	5	298	88	-6	+0	-9	-8	+10	-1.3
2008	25	MLB RAW	2 teams	—	452	419	106	17	4	12	26	95	5	4	1	253	304	399	703	146	299	21	6	312	88	-6	+0	-9	-8	+10	-1.3
2009	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	523	458	129	21	6	19	53	100	5	11	6	282	362	478	841	197	318	19	10	367	135	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	523	433	138	24	6	23	78	82	5	11	6	319	428	561	989	242	343	16	15	427	135	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	489	453	108	23	2	20	29	104	4	1	3	238	290	430	721	192	265	21	6	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	489	439	123	27	3	23	43	90	4	1	3	280	350	513	862	232	304	18	9	376	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	483	461	122	25	1	13	19	99	1	2	4	265	295	408	703	143	311	20	4	305	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	483	451	133	28	1	15	29	84	1	2	4	295	339	461	800	166	333	17	6	353	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA MLE	Piratas de Campeche	—	89	83	22	6	1	1	5	14	0	0	0	265	307	398	704	133	304	16	6	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA RAW	Piratas de Campeche	—	89	80	24	7	1	1	8	12	0	0	0	300	364	450	814	150	338	13	9	358	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	355	344	65	11	0	8	7	82	1	1	2	189	207	291	498	102	222	23	2	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA RAW	Indianapolis Indians	—	355	338	80	15	0	9	13	67	1	1	2	237	267	361	628	124	268	19	4	277	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2005	22	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	513	479	110	22	1	12	26	145	3	3	7	230	276	355	631	125	289	28	5	271	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2006	23	A+ MLE	San Jose Giants	—	511	480	115	26	5	6	24	134	2	6	3	240	281	352	634	113	311	26	5	274	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2007	24	AA MLE	Connecticut Defenders	—	587	542	152	31	6	18	28	126	12	3	7	280	334	459	793	179	320	21	5	339	116	—	—	—	—	—	—
2008	25	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	452	421	103	16	4	12	23	101	5	4	1	245	291	387	678	143	294	22	5	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2009	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	523	460	129	21	6	19	53	100	5	11	6	280	362	476	838	196	312	19	10	367	135	—	—	—	—	—	—
2010	27	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	489	453	108	23	2	20	29	104	4	1	3	238	290	430	721	192	268	21	6	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2011	28	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	483	460	122	25	1	13	19	99	1	2	4	265	295	409	704	143	310	20	4	305	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	31	AAA MLE	Piratas de Campeche	—	89	84	22	6	1	1	5	14	0	0	0	262	307	393	700	131	296	16	6	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	32	AAA MLE	Indianapolis Indians	—	355	344	65	11	0	8	7	82	1	1	2	189	207	291	498	102	220	23	2	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	622	574	133	25	5	17	39	136	4	2	3	232	285	382	667	150	272	22	6	295	91	-10	-1	-10	-24	+13	-3.2
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	600	139	26	5	18	41	142	4	2	3	232	285	382	667	150	272	22	6	295	91	-11	-1	-10	-25	+14	-3.3
Career	—	MLE		—	4002	3705	926	181	26	109	214	905	33	31	33	250	297	401	698	151	299	23	5	302	91	-10	-1	-10	-24	+13	-3.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	602	150	29	4	18	35	147	5	5	5	249	296	400	696	151	297	23	5	302	91	-11	-1	-10	-25	+14	-3.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2015 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 355 PAwOBA .271 → .218 (−53)K% 18.9% → 23.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.87%	÷0.977	×1.200	—	—	23.17%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.38%	÷1.077	×0.690	—	×0.952	2.06%
HBP% /PA	0.28%	—	×0.940	—	×0.952	0.25%
Singles /BIP	20.66%	÷1.044	×0.930	×0.992	×0.952	17.39%
Doubles /BIP	5.54%	÷1.050	×0.830	×0.992	×0.952	4.13%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.041	×0.970	×0.992	×0.952	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	3.32%	÷0.847	×0.840	—	×0.952	3.14%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 69, 1B 109, 2B 110, 3B 108, K 95, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 32 vs a level average of 27.2 → −4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .271 → .218; ISO .124 → .106; BABIP .268 → .220. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 AAAPiratas de Campeche · 89 PAwOBA .352 → .290 (−62)K% 13.5% → 16.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.48%	÷1.008	×1.200	—	—	16.06%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.99%	÷1.055	×0.690	—	×0.962	5.66%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×0.962	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.06%	÷0.995	×0.930	×1.024	×0.962	20.29%
Doubles /BIP	10.29%	÷1.010	×0.830	×1.024	×0.962	8.33%
Triples /BIP	1.47%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.024	×0.962	1.16%
Home runs /BIP	1.47%	÷1.245	×0.700	—	×0.962	0.80%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 99, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 102, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 31 vs a level average of 27.2 → −3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.024.

Result: wOBA .352 → .290; ISO .150 → .114; BABIP .338 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2011 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 451 PAwOBA .356 → .316 (−40)K% 16.2% → 19.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.19%	÷0.995	×1.200	—	—	19.51%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.76%	÷0.978	×0.690	—	×0.992	4.03%
HBP% /PA	0.22%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	0.21%
Singles /BIP	24.71%	÷1.008	×0.930	×1.030	×0.992	23.29%
Doubles /BIP	7.76%	÷0.927	×0.830	×1.030	×0.992	7.10%
Triples /BIP	0.29%	÷0.984	×0.970	×1.030	×0.992	0.29%
Home runs /BIP	4.31%	÷0.955	×0.840	—	×0.992	3.76%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 102, 2B 85, 3B 97, K 99, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .356 → .316; ISO .176 → .155; BABIP .340 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2010 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 322 PAwOBA .405 → .330 (−75)K% 17.7% → 22.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.70%	÷0.967	×1.200	—	—	21.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.45%	÷1.000	×0.690	—	×1.003	5.16%
HBP% /PA	1.24%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	1.17%
Singles /BIP	21.65%	÷1.067	×0.930	×0.977	×1.003	18.50%
Doubles /BIP	8.23%	÷0.981	×0.830	×0.977	×1.003	6.82%
Triples /BIP	1.30%	÷1.148	×0.970	×0.977	×1.003	1.08%
Home runs /BIP	7.79%	÷1.048	×0.840	—	×1.003	6.26%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 113, 2B 96, 3B 130, K 93, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.977.

Result: wOBA .405 → .330; ISO .274 → .223; BABIP .336 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2009 AAAFresno Grizzlies · 450 PAwOBA .443 → .383 (−60)K% 14.2% → 18.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.22%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	18.35%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	15.11%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.018	10.92%
HBP% /PA	0.89%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.89%
Singles /BIP	25.83%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.020	×1.018	24.13%
Doubles /BIP	7.28%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.020	×1.018	6.12%
Triples /BIP	1.32%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.020	×1.018	1.11%
Home runs /BIP	6.95%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.018	5.52%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.

Result: wOBA .443 → .383; ISO .254 → .214; BABIP .362 → .325. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2008 AAAFresno Grizzlies · 102 PAwOBA .299 → .252 (−48)K% 20.6% → 26.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.59%	÷1.000	×1.290	—	—	26.56%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.86%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×1.033	5.03%
HBP% /PA	1.96%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	1.98%
Singles /BIP	23.61%	÷1.000	×0.900	×1.022	×1.033	22.42%
Doubles /BIP	4.17%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.022	×1.033	3.56%
Triples /BIP	1.39%	÷1.000	×0.810	×1.022	×1.033	1.19%
Home runs /BIP	2.78%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.033	2.24%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .299 → .252; ISO .118 → .092; BABIP .300 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2007 AAConnecticut Defenders · 587 PAwOBA .381 → .339 (−42)K% 17.5% → 21.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.55%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	21.41%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.81%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×1.012	4.83%
HBP% /PA	2.04%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	1.76%
Singles /BIP	23.15%	÷1.000	×0.970	×1.006	×1.012	22.86%
Doubles /BIP	8.35%	÷1.000	×0.860	×1.006	×1.012	7.31%
Triples /BIP	1.43%	÷1.000	×0.950	×1.006	×1.012	1.38%
Home runs /BIP	5.25%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.012	4.14%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.006.

Result: wOBA .381 → .339; ISO .216 → .182; BABIP .337 → .320. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2006 A+San Jose Giants · 511 PAwOBA .324 → .274 (−51)K% 19.6% → 26.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.57%	÷1.000	×1.340	—	—	26.22%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.65%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×0.998	4.71%
HBP% /PA	0.39%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	0.31%
Singles /BIP	23.76%	÷1.000	×0.910	×1.025	×0.998	22.12%
Doubles /BIP	8.84%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.025	×0.998	7.42%
Triples /BIP	1.66%	÷1.000	×0.760	×1.025	×0.998	1.29%
Home runs /BIP	1.93%	÷1.000	×0.920	—	×0.998	1.78%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.

Result: wOBA .324 → .274; ISO .141 → .117; BABIP .346 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).