Edwin Jackson
P Detroit Tigers| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 33 | MIX2 levels | 33 | 18 | 117 | 4.01 | 4.95 | 19.6% | 9.3% | 0.6 | K 18.7% · BB 9.5% · FIP 5.02 | |
| 2018 | 34 | MIX2 levels | 30 | 30 | 163 | 3.42 | 4.06 | 19.0% | 9.6% | 2.6 | K 17.9% · BB 9.8% · FIP 4.32 | |
| 2019 | 35 | MIX3 levels | 26 | 18 | 94 | 8.62 | 6.90 | 16.9% | 9.8% | -1.6 | K 15.1% · BB 10.3% · FIP 6.97 | |
| 2020 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 40 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 41 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 42 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2003 | 19 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 4 | 3 | 22 | 91 | 19 | 10 | 2 | 75% | 5.5 | 20.9% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 2.2% | 2.45 | 3.94 | +0.4 |
| 2003 | 19 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 4 | 3 | 22 | 91 | 19 | 10 | 2 | 75% | 5.5 | 20.9% | 11.0% | 9.9% | 2.2% | 2.45 | 3.92 | +0.4 |
| 2004 | 20 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 8 | 5 | 25 | 113 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 62% | 3.1 | 14.2% | 8.8% | 5.3% | 6.2% | 7.30 | 6.43 | -0.3 |
| 2004 | 20 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 8 | 5 | 25 | 113 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 62% | 3.1 | 14.2% | 8.8% | 5.3% | 6.2% | 7.30 | 6.71 | -0.4 |
| 2005 | 21 | MLB MLE | Los Angeles Dodgers | 7 | 6 | 29 | 134 | 13 | 17 | 2 | 86% | 4.1 | 9.7% | 12.7% | -3.0% | 1.5% | 6.28 | 4.71 | +0.2 |
| 2005 | 21 | MLB RAW | Los Angeles Dodgers | 7 | 6 | 29 | 134 | 13 | 17 | 2 | 86% | 4.1 | 9.7% | 12.7% | -3.0% | 1.5% | 6.28 | 4.88 | +0.2 |
| 2006 | 22 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Devil Rays | 23 | 1 | 36 | 174 | 27 | 25 | 2 | 4% | 1.6 | 15.5% | 14.4% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 5.45 | 4.24 | +0.1 |
| 2006 | 22 | MLB RAW | Tampa Bay Devil Rays | 23 | 1 | 36 | 174 | 27 | 25 | 2 | 4% | 1.6 | 15.5% | 14.4% | 1.1% | 1.1% | 5.45 | 4.39 | +0.1 |
| 2007 | 23 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Devil Rays | 32 | 31 | 161 | 755 | 128 | 85 | 19 | 97% | 5.0 | 17.0% | 11.3% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 5.76 | 4.48 | +1.7 |
| 2007 | 23 | MLB RAW | Tampa Bay Devil Rays | 32 | 31 | 161 | 755 | 128 | 85 | 19 | 97% | 5.0 | 17.0% | 11.3% | 5.7% | 2.5% | 5.76 | 4.63 | +1.4 |
| 2008 | 24 | MLB MLE | Tampa Bay Rays | 32 | 31 | 183 | 792 | 108 | 76 | 23 | 97% | 5.7 | 13.6% | 9.6% | 4.0% | 2.9% | 4.42 | 4.76 | +1.4 |
| 2008 | 24 | MLB RAW | Tampa Bay Rays | 32 | 31 | 183 | 792 | 108 | 76 | 23 | 97% | 5.7 | 13.6% | 9.6% | 4.0% | 2.9% | 4.42 | 4.80 | +1.3 |
| 2009 | 25 | MLB MLE | Detroit Tigers | 33 | 33 | 214 | 890 | 161 | 67 | 27 | 100% | 6.5 | 18.1% | 7.5% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 3.62 | 4.19 | +3.1 |
| 2009 | 25 | MLB RAW | Detroit Tigers | 33 | 33 | 214 | 890 | 161 | 67 | 27 | 100% | 6.5 | 18.1% | 7.5% | 10.6% | 3.0% | 3.62 | 4.17 | +3.1 |
| 2010 | 26 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 32 | 32 | 209 | 902 | 181 | 74 | 21 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.1% | 8.2% | 11.9% | 2.3% | 4.47 | 3.70 | +4.3 |
| 2010 | 26 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 32 | 32 | 209 | 902 | 181 | 74 | 21 | 100% | 6.5 | 20.1% | 8.2% | 11.9% | 2.3% | 4.47 | 3.74 | +4.2 |
| 2011 | 27 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 31 | 200 | 861 | 148 | 58 | 16 | 97% | 6.2 | 17.2% | 6.7% | 10.5% | 2.0% | 3.79 | 3.60 | +4.4 |
| 2011 | 27 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 31 | 200 | 861 | 148 | 58 | 16 | 97% | 6.2 | 17.2% | 6.7% | 10.5% | 1.9% | 3.79 | 3.53 | +4.6 |
| 2012 | 28 | MLB MLE | Washington Nationals | 31 | 31 | 190 | 790 | 168 | 53 | 23 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.3% | 6.7% | 14.6% | 2.9% | 4.03 | 3.75 | +3.8 |
| 2012 | 28 | MLB RAW | Washington Nationals | 31 | 31 | 190 | 790 | 168 | 53 | 23 | 100% | 6.1 | 21.3% | 6.7% | 14.6% | 2.9% | 4.03 | 3.74 | +3.8 |
| 2013 | 29 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 31 | 31 | 175 | 777 | 135 | 52 | 16 | 100% | 5.7 | 17.4% | 6.7% | 10.7% | 2.1% | 4.98 | 3.65 | +3.7 |
| 2013 | 29 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 31 | 31 | 175 | 777 | 135 | 52 | 16 | 100% | 5.7 | 17.4% | 6.7% | 10.7% | 2.1% | 4.98 | 3.64 | +3.8 |
| 2014 | 30 | MLB MLE | Chicago Cubs | 28 | 27 | 141 | 633 | 123 | 60 | 18 | 96% | 5.0 | 19.4% | 9.5% | 10.0% | 3.0% | 6.33 | 4.28 | +1.8 |
| 2014 | 30 | MLB RAW | Chicago Cubs | 28 | 27 | 141 | 633 | 123 | 60 | 18 | 96% | 5.0 | 19.4% | 9.5% | 10.0% | 2.8% | 6.33 | 4.29 | +1.8 |
| 2015 | 31 | MLB MLE | Atlanta Braves | 47 | 0 | 56 | 228 | 40 | 20 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 17.5% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 1.9% | 3.07 | 3.77 | +0.5 |
| 2015 | 31 | MLB RAW | Atlanta Braves | 47 | 0 | 56 | 228 | 40 | 20 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 17.5% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 1.8% | 3.07 | 3.67 | +0.6 |
| 2016 | 32 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 18 | 101 | 455 | 73 | 45 | 16 | 69% | 3.9 | 15.7% | 10.1% | 5.6% | 3.6% | 6.08 | 5.00 | +0.5 |
| 2016 | 32 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 18 | 101 | 455 | 73 | 45 | 16 | 69% | 3.9 | 16.0% | 9.9% | 6.2% | 3.5% | 6.08 | 5.06 | +0.4 |
| 2017 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 33 | 18 | 117 | 505 | 99 | 47 | 21 | 55% | 3.5 | 18.7% | 9.5% | 9.2% | 4.2% | 4.01 | 5.02 | +0.5 |
| 2017 | 33 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 33 | 18 | 117 | 505 | 99 | 47 | 21 | 55% | 3.5 | 19.6% | 9.3% | 10.3% | 4.2% | 4.01 | 4.95 | +0.6 |
| 2018 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 30 | 30 | 163 | 690 | 131 | 66 | 17 | 100% | 5.4 | 17.9% | 9.8% | 8.1% | 2.7% | 3.42 | 4.32 | +2.1 |
| 2018 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 30 | 30 | 163 | 690 | 131 | 66 | 17 | 100% | 5.4 | 19.0% | 9.6% | 9.4% | 2.5% | 3.42 | 4.06 | +2.6 |
| 2019 | 35 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 18 | 94 | 451 | 76 | 44 | 29 | 69% | 3.6 | 15.1% | 10.3% | 4.8% | 7.0% | 8.62 | 6.97 | -1.6 |
| 2019 | 35 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 18 | 94 | 451 | 76 | 44 | 29 | 69% | 3.6 | 16.9% | 9.8% | 7.1% | 6.4% | 8.62 | 6.90 | -1.6 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 412 | 318 | 1960 | 8569 | 1508 | 740 | 249 | 77% | 4.8 | 17.6% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 2.9% | 4.78 | 4.35 | +24.2 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 412 | 318 | 1960 | 8569 | 1508 | 740 | 249 | 77% | 4.8 | 17.6% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 2.9% | 4.78 | 4.30 | +25.3 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 42 | 32 | 200 | 874 | 154 | 76 | 25 | 77% | 4.8 | 17.6% | 8.6% | 9.0% | 2.9% | 4.78 | 4.30 | +2.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 455 | 346 | 2115 | 9241 | 1624 | 815 | 270 | 76% | 4.6 | 17.6% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 2.9% | 4.71 | 4.34 | +24.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 43 | 33 | 200 | 874 | 154 | 77 | 26 | 76% | 4.6 | 17.6% | 8.8% | 8.8% | 2.9% | 4.71 | 4.34 | +2.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 AAAToledo Mud Hens · 21 IPFIP 6.22 → 7.14 (+0.92)K% 15.6% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.62% | — | ×0.880 | 13.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.50% | — | ×1.050 | 13.12% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.21% | ÷0.888 | ×1.100 | 6.45% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 78).
Result: FIP 6.22 → 7.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAANashville Sounds · 71 IPFIP 3.50 → 3.86 (+0.37)K% 20.4% → 17.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.39% | — | ×0.880 | 17.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.71% | — | ×1.050 | 10.19% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.62% | ÷0.988 | ×1.100 | 1.80% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 3.50 → 3.86, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAASyracuse Chiefs · 41 IPFIP 2.97 → 3.33 (+0.35)K% 23.5% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.49% | — | ×0.880 | 20.67% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.05% | — | ×1.050 | 12.65% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.60% | ÷0.980 | ×1.100 | 0.68% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 2.97 → 3.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 13 IPFIP 4.79 → 4.90 (+0.11)K% 13.8% → 12.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 13.85% | — | ×0.880 | 12.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 9.23% | — | ×1.050 | 9.69% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.08% | ÷1.160 | ×1.100 | 2.92% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 132).
Result: FIP 4.79 → 4.90, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).