Adam Wainwright
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 39 | MLBSTL | 32 | 32 | 206 | 3.05 | 3.42 | 21.0% | 5.7% | 5.0 | ||
| 2022 | 40 | MLBSTL | 32 | 32 | 192 | 3.71 | 3.52 | 17.8% | 6.6% | 4.4 | ||
| 2023 | 41 | MIX3 levels | 24 | 24 | 114 | 7.26 | 5.55 | 12.5% | 7.9% | -0.2 | K 11.4% · BB 8.5% · FIP 5.65 | |
| 2024 | 42 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 43 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 44 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 35 | MLBSTL | 50 | .262/.279/.452 | 2 | 0 | 75 | -0.0 | |
| 2019 | 37 | MLBSTL | 59 | .160/.192/.220 | 0 | 0 | -3 | -0.6 | |
| 2021 | 39 | MLBSTL | 74 | .123/.167/.158 | 0 | 0 | -30 | -1.0 | |
| 2022 | 40 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2023 | 41 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2024 | 42 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2025 | 43 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2026 | 44 | No MLB games played | |||||||
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 | 23 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 11.1% | -11.1% | 11.1% | 13.50 | 10.61 | -0.1 |
| 2005 | 23 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 11.1% | -11.1% | 11.1% | 13.50 | 11.10 | -0.2 |
| 2006 | 24 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 61 | 0 | 75 | 309 | 72 | 20 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.3% | 6.5% | 16.8% | 1.9% | 3.12 | 3.02 | +1.4 |
| 2006 | 24 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 61 | 0 | 75 | 309 | 72 | 20 | 6 | 0% | 1.2 | 23.3% | 6.5% | 16.8% | 1.9% | 3.12 | 3.02 | +1.4 |
| 2007 | 25 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 202 | 882 | 136 | 66 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 15.4% | 7.5% | 7.9% | 1.5% | 3.70 | 3.55 | +4.6 |
| 2007 | 25 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 202 | 882 | 136 | 66 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 15.4% | 7.5% | 7.9% | 1.5% | 3.70 | 3.57 | +4.5 |
| 2008 | 26 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 20 | 20 | 132 | 544 | 91 | 33 | 12 | 100% | 6.6 | 16.7% | 6.1% | 10.7% | 2.2% | 3.20 | 3.67 | +2.8 |
| 2008 | 26 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 20 | 20 | 132 | 544 | 91 | 33 | 12 | 100% | 6.6 | 16.7% | 6.1% | 10.7% | 2.2% | 3.20 | 3.65 | +2.8 |
| 2009 | 27 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 34 | 34 | 233 | 970 | 212 | 65 | 17 | 100% | 6.9 | 21.9% | 6.7% | 15.2% | 1.8% | 2.63 | 3.07 | +6.9 |
| 2009 | 27 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 34 | 34 | 233 | 970 | 212 | 65 | 17 | 100% | 6.9 | 21.9% | 6.7% | 15.2% | 1.8% | 2.63 | 3.07 | +6.9 |
| 2010 | 28 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 33 | 33 | 230 | 910 | 213 | 54 | 15 | 100% | 7.0 | 23.4% | 5.9% | 17.5% | 1.8% | 2.42 | 2.85 | +7.6 |
| 2010 | 28 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 33 | 33 | 230 | 910 | 213 | 54 | 15 | 100% | 7.0 | 23.4% | 5.9% | 17.5% | 1.6% | 2.42 | 2.80 | +7.7 |
| 2012 | 30 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 199 | 831 | 184 | 49 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.1% | 5.9% | 16.2% | 1.9% | 3.94 | 3.04 | +5.9 |
| 2012 | 30 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 199 | 831 | 184 | 49 | 15 | 100% | 6.2 | 22.1% | 5.9% | 16.2% | 1.8% | 3.94 | 2.97 | +6.1 |
| 2013 | 31 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 34 | 34 | 242 | 956 | 219 | 33 | 15 | 100% | 7.1 | 22.9% | 3.5% | 19.5% | 1.7% | 2.94 | 2.53 | +9.1 |
| 2013 | 31 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 34 | 34 | 242 | 956 | 219 | 33 | 15 | 100% | 7.1 | 22.9% | 3.5% | 19.5% | 1.6% | 2.94 | 2.50 | +9.2 |
| 2014 | 32 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 227 | 898 | 179 | 45 | 10 | 100% | 7.1 | 19.9% | 5.0% | 14.9% | 1.2% | 2.38 | 2.71 | +7.9 |
| 2014 | 32 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 227 | 898 | 179 | 45 | 10 | 100% | 7.1 | 19.9% | 5.0% | 14.9% | 1.1% | 2.38 | 2.69 | +8.0 |
| 2015 | 33 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 7 | 4 | 28 | 111 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 57% | 4.0 | 18.0% | 3.6% | 14.4% | 0.0% | 1.61 | 2.03 | +1.2 |
| 2015 | 33 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 7 | 4 | 28 | 111 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 57% | 4.0 | 18.0% | 3.6% | 14.4% | 0.0% | 1.61 | 2.10 | +1.2 |
| 2016 | 34 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 33 | 33 | 199 | 847 | 161 | 55 | 22 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.0% | 6.5% | 12.5% | 2.8% | 4.62 | 3.85 | +3.7 |
| 2016 | 34 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 33 | 33 | 199 | 847 | 161 | 55 | 22 | 100% | 6.0 | 19.0% | 6.5% | 12.5% | 2.6% | 4.62 | 3.75 | +4.0 |
| 2017 | 35 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 24 | 23 | 123 | 546 | 96 | 41 | 14 | 96% | 5.1 | 17.6% | 7.5% | 10.1% | 2.8% | 5.11 | 4.08 | +1.9 |
| 2017 | 35 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 24 | 23 | 123 | 546 | 96 | 41 | 14 | 96% | 5.1 | 17.6% | 7.5% | 10.1% | 2.6% | 5.11 | 4.02 | +2.0 |
| 2018 | 36 | MIX MLE | 4 levels | 15 | 15 | 62 | 262 | 65 | 21 | 5 | 100% | 4.2 | 22.1% | 9.4% | 12.7% | 3.0% | 2.89 | 4.05 | +1.0 |
| 2018 | 36 | MIX RAW | 4 levels | 15 | 15 | 62 | 262 | 65 | 21 | 5 | 100% | 4.2 | 24.8% | 8.0% | 16.8% | 1.9% | 2.89 | 3.07 | +1.8 |
| 2019 | 37 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 31 | 31 | 172 | 745 | 153 | 57 | 22 | 100% | 5.5 | 20.5% | 7.7% | 12.9% | 3.2% | 4.19 | 4.08 | +2.7 |
| 2019 | 37 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 31 | 31 | 172 | 745 | 153 | 57 | 22 | 100% | 5.5 | 20.5% | 7.7% | 12.9% | 3.0% | 4.19 | 3.98 | +2.9 |
| 2020 | 38 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 10 | 10 | 66 | 262 | 54 | 15 | 9 | 100% | 6.6 | 20.6% | 5.7% | 14.9% | 3.7% | 3.15 | 4.11 | +1.0 |
| 2020 | 38 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 10 | 10 | 66 | 262 | 54 | 15 | 9 | 100% | 6.6 | 20.6% | 5.7% | 14.9% | 3.4% | 3.15 | 3.92 | +1.2 |
| 2021 | 39 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 206 | 828 | 174 | 47 | 21 | 100% | 6.4 | 21.0% | 5.7% | 15.3% | 2.7% | 3.05 | 3.54 | +4.7 |
| 2021 | 39 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 206 | 828 | 174 | 47 | 21 | 100% | 6.4 | 21.0% | 5.7% | 15.3% | 2.5% | 3.05 | 3.42 | +5.0 |
| 2022 | 40 | MLB MLE | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 192 | 803 | 143 | 53 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.8% | 6.6% | 11.2% | 2.1% | 3.71 | 3.61 | +4.2 |
| 2022 | 40 | MLB RAW | St. Louis Cardinals | 32 | 32 | 192 | 803 | 143 | 53 | 16 | 100% | 6.0 | 17.8% | 6.6% | 11.2% | 2.0% | 3.71 | 3.52 | +4.4 |
| 2023 | 41 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 114 | 542 | 68 | 43 | 22 | 100% | 4.8 | 11.4% | 8.5% | 2.9% | 4.4% | 7.26 | 5.65 | -0.3 |
| 2023 | 41 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 24 | 24 | 114 | 542 | 68 | 43 | 22 | 100% | 4.8 | 12.5% | 7.9% | 4.6% | 4.1% | 7.26 | 5.55 | -0.2 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 478 | 411 | 2668 | 11116 | 2202 | 696 | 233 | 86% | 5.6 | 19.8% | 6.3% | 13.5% | 2.1% | 3.53 | 3.37 | +66.7 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 478 | 411 | 2668 | 11116 | 2202 | 696 | 233 | 86% | 5.6 | 19.8% | 6.3% | 13.5% | 2.1% | 3.53 | 3.37 | +66.6 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 36 | 31 | 200 | 833 | 165 | 52 | 17 | 86% | 5.6 | 19.8% | 6.3% | 13.5% | 2.1% | 3.53 | 3.37 | +5.0 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 488 | 421 | 2703 | 11255 | 2226 | 709 | 252 | 86% | 5.5 | 19.8% | 6.3% | 13.5% | 2.2% | 3.52 | 3.46 | +66.7 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 36 | 31 | 200 | 833 | 165 | 52 | 19 | 86% | 5.5 | 19.8% | 6.3% | 13.5% | 2.2% | 3.52 | 3.46 | +5.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2023 AASpringfield Cardinals · 7 IPFIP 4.12 → 4.54 (+0.42)K% 12.1% → 9.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.12% | — | ×0.810 | 9.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.03% | — | ×1.100 | 3.33% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.080 | ×1.200 | 3.37% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 116).
Result: FIP 4.12 → 4.54, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 6 IPFIP 2.76 → 3.47 (+0.71)K% 36.0% → 31.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.00% | — | ×0.860 | 30.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.00% | — | ×0.900 | 3.60% |
| HR / BF /BF | 4.00% | ÷0.955 | ×1.100 | 4.61% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 91).
Result: FIP 2.76 → 3.47, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAAMemphis Redbirds · 9 IPFIP 1.93 → 2.31 (+0.38)K% 30.6% → 26.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 30.56% | — | ×0.880 | 26.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.11% | — | ×1.050 | 11.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.909 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 1.93 → 2.31, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AASpringfield Cardinals · 10 IPFIP 0.99 → 1.39 (+0.40)K% 25.0% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.810 | 20.25% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 0.00% | — | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.215 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 143).
Result: FIP 0.99 → 1.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).