Jake Peavy
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 33 | MLBSF | 32 | 32 | 203 | 3.73 | 3.92 | 18.5% | 7.2% | 3.6 | ||
| 2015 | 34 | MIX3 levels | 26 | 26 | 146 | 4.06 | 3.80 | 18.2% | 5.6% | 2.8 | K 17.3% · BB 5.7% · FIP 4.07 | |
| 2016 | 35 | MLBSF | 31 | 21 | 119 | 5.54 | 4.24 | 19.6% | 6.7% | 1.6 | ||
| 2017 | 36 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 37 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 38 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2020 | 39 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 40 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 41 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 42 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 43 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 44 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 45 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 33 | MLBSF | 24 | .000/.000/.000 | 0 | 0 | -114 | -0.6 | |
| 2015 | 34 | MLBSF | 41 | .194/.216/.333 | 1 | 0 | 38 | -0.2 | |
| 2016 | 35 | MLBSF | 31 | .185/.241/.185 | 0 | 0 | 17 | -0.2 | |
| 2017 | 36 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2018 | 37 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2019 | 38 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2020 | 39 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2021 | 40 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2022 | 41 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2023 | 42 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2024 | 43 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2025 | 44 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2026 | 45 | No MLB games played | |||||||
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2002 | 21 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 17 | 17 | 98 | 430 | 90 | 29 | 11 | 100% | 5.7 | 20.9% | 6.7% | 14.2% | 2.6% | 4.52 | 3.59 | +2.2 |
| 2002 | 21 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 17 | 17 | 98 | 430 | 90 | 29 | 11 | 100% | 5.7 | 20.9% | 6.7% | 14.2% | 2.6% | 4.52 | 3.61 | +2.1 |
| 2003 | 22 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 32 | 32 | 195 | 827 | 156 | 79 | 33 | 100% | 6.1 | 18.9% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 4.0% | 4.11 | 4.91 | +1.1 |
| 2003 | 22 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 32 | 32 | 195 | 827 | 156 | 79 | 33 | 100% | 6.1 | 18.9% | 9.6% | 9.3% | 4.0% | 4.11 | 4.92 | +1.1 |
| 2004 | 23 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 27 | 27 | 166 | 694 | 173 | 49 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.9% | 7.1% | 17.9% | 1.9% | 2.27 | 2.92 | +5.2 |
| 2004 | 23 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 27 | 27 | 166 | 694 | 173 | 49 | 13 | 100% | 6.2 | 24.9% | 7.1% | 17.9% | 1.9% | 2.27 | 2.92 | +5.2 |
| 2005 | 24 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 30 | 30 | 203 | 812 | 216 | 47 | 18 | 100% | 6.8 | 26.6% | 5.8% | 20.8% | 2.2% | 2.88 | 2.80 | +6.8 |
| 2005 | 24 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 30 | 30 | 203 | 812 | 216 | 47 | 18 | 100% | 6.8 | 26.6% | 5.8% | 20.8% | 2.2% | 2.88 | 2.82 | +6.7 |
| 2006 | 25 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 32 | 32 | 202 | 846 | 215 | 51 | 23 | 100% | 6.3 | 25.4% | 6.0% | 19.4% | 2.7% | 4.09 | 3.21 | +5.5 |
| 2006 | 25 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 32 | 32 | 202 | 846 | 215 | 51 | 23 | 100% | 6.3 | 25.4% | 6.0% | 19.4% | 2.7% | 4.09 | 3.21 | +5.5 |
| 2007 | 26 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 34 | 34 | 223 | 898 | 240 | 63 | 13 | 100% | 6.6 | 26.7% | 7.0% | 19.7% | 1.4% | 2.54 | 2.53 | +8.4 |
| 2007 | 26 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 34 | 34 | 223 | 898 | 240 | 63 | 13 | 100% | 6.6 | 26.7% | 7.0% | 19.7% | 1.4% | 2.54 | 2.55 | +8.3 |
| 2008 | 27 | MLB MLE | San Diego Padres | 27 | 27 | 174 | 709 | 166 | 58 | 17 | 100% | 6.4 | 23.4% | 8.2% | 15.2% | 2.4% | 2.85 | 3.48 | +4.1 |
| 2008 | 27 | MLB RAW | San Diego Padres | 27 | 27 | 174 | 709 | 166 | 58 | 17 | 100% | 6.4 | 23.4% | 8.2% | 15.2% | 2.4% | 2.85 | 3.46 | +4.1 |
| 2009 | 28 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 16 | 16 | 102 | 410 | 110 | 34 | 8 | 100% | 6.4 | 26.8% | 8.3% | 18.5% | 2.0% | 3.45 | 2.96 | +3.2 |
| 2009 | 28 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 16 | 16 | 102 | 410 | 110 | 34 | 8 | 100% | 6.4 | 26.8% | 8.3% | 18.5% | 2.0% | 3.45 | 2.96 | +3.1 |
| 2010 | 29 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 17 | 17 | 107 | 450 | 93 | 32 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.7% | 7.1% | 13.6% | 2.8% | 4.63 | 3.81 | +2.0 |
| 2010 | 29 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 17 | 17 | 107 | 450 | 93 | 32 | 13 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.7% | 7.1% | 13.6% | 2.9% | 4.63 | 3.84 | +2.0 |
| 2011 | 30 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 19 | 18 | 112 | 470 | 95 | 20 | 10 | 95% | 5.9 | 20.2% | 4.3% | 16.0% | 2.1% | 4.92 | 3.08 | +3.2 |
| 2011 | 30 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 19 | 18 | 112 | 470 | 95 | 20 | 10 | 95% | 5.9 | 20.2% | 4.3% | 16.0% | 2.1% | 4.92 | 3.10 | +3.2 |
| 2012 | 31 | MLB MLE | Chicago White Sox | 32 | 32 | 219 | 882 | 194 | 48 | 27 | 100% | 6.8 | 22.0% | 5.4% | 16.6% | 3.0% | 3.37 | 3.58 | +4.9 |
| 2012 | 31 | MLB RAW | Chicago White Sox | 32 | 32 | 219 | 882 | 194 | 48 | 27 | 100% | 6.8 | 22.0% | 5.4% | 16.6% | 3.1% | 3.37 | 3.59 | +4.9 |
| 2013 | 32 | MLB MLE | Boston Red Sox | 23 | 23 | 145 | 590 | 121 | 36 | 20 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.5% | 6.1% | 14.4% | 3.5% | 4.17 | 4.05 | +2.3 |
| 2013 | 32 | MLB RAW | Boston Red Sox | 23 | 23 | 145 | 590 | 121 | 36 | 20 | 100% | 6.3 | 20.5% | 6.1% | 14.4% | 3.4% | 4.17 | 3.97 | +2.5 |
| 2014 | 33 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 32 | 32 | 203 | 852 | 158 | 61 | 23 | 100% | 6.3 | 18.5% | 7.2% | 11.4% | 2.9% | 3.73 | 4.04 | +3.3 |
| 2014 | 33 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 32 | 32 | 203 | 852 | 158 | 61 | 23 | 100% | 6.3 | 18.5% | 7.2% | 11.4% | 2.7% | 3.73 | 3.92 | +3.6 |
| 2015 | 34 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 26 | 26 | 146 | 604 | 110 | 34 | 17 | 100% | 5.6 | 17.3% | 5.7% | 11.7% | 3.1% | 4.06 | 4.07 | +2.3 |
| 2015 | 34 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 26 | 26 | 146 | 604 | 110 | 34 | 17 | 100% | 5.6 | 18.2% | 5.6% | 12.6% | 2.8% | 4.06 | 3.80 | +2.8 |
| 2016 | 35 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 31 | 21 | 119 | 520 | 102 | 35 | 18 | 68% | 3.8 | 19.6% | 6.7% | 12.9% | 3.7% | 5.54 | 4.35 | +1.5 |
| 2016 | 35 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 31 | 21 | 119 | 520 | 102 | 35 | 18 | 68% | 3.8 | 19.6% | 6.7% | 12.9% | 3.5% | 5.54 | 4.24 | +1.6 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 388 | 377 | 2377 | 9838 | 2207 | 666 | 259 | 97% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 6.8% | 15.7% | 2.6% | 3.63 | 3.50 | +55.4 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 388 | 377 | 2377 | 9838 | 2207 | 666 | 259 | 97% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 6.8% | 15.7% | 2.6% | 3.63 | 3.51 | +55.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 33 | 32 | 200 | 828 | 186 | 56 | 22 | 97% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 6.8% | 15.7% | 2.6% | 3.63 | 3.51 | +4.6 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 395 | 384 | 2413 | 9994 | 2234 | 676 | 269 | 97% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 6.8% | 15.6% | 2.7% | 3.66 | 3.55 | +55.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 33 | 32 | 200 | 828 | 185 | 56 | 22 | 97% | 6.1 | 22.4% | 6.8% | 15.6% | 2.7% | 3.66 | 3.55 | +4.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 AAASacramento River Cats · 32 IPFIP 4.16 → 4.62 (+0.47)K% 19.4% → 17.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 19.44% | — | ×0.880 | 17.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.25% | — | ×1.050 | 6.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.47% | ÷0.982 | ×1.100 | 3.89% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 4.16 → 4.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).