Ryan Vogelsong
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 37 | MLBSF | 32 | 32 | 185 | 4.00 | 3.64 | 19.4% | 7.2% | 3.9 | ||
| 2015 | 38 | MLBSF | 33 | 22 | 135 | 4.67 | 4.38 | 18.1% | 9.4% | 1.6 | ||
| 2016 | 39 | MIX3 levels | 28 | 18 | 104 | 4.40 | 4.83 | 15.4% | 9.2% | 0.7 | K 16.7% · BB 10.4% · FIP 4.79 | |
| 2017 | 40 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2018 | 41 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2019 | 42 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2020 | 43 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 44 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 45 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 46 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 47 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 48 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 49 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 37 | MLBSF | 66 | .115/.156/.148 | 0 | 0 | -19 | -0.8 | |
| 2015 | 38 | MLBSF | 45 | .139/.162/.250 | 1 | 0 | -9 | -0.5 | |
| 2016 | 39 | MLBPIT | 23 | .053/.143/.053 | 0 | 0 | -45 | -0.4 | |
| 2017 | 40 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2018 | 41 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2019 | 42 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2020 | 43 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2021 | 44 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2022 | 45 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2023 | 46 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2024 | 47 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2025 | 48 | No MLB games played | |||||||
| 2026 | 49 | No MLB games played | |||||||
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 | 23 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 4 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 25.0% | 8.3% | 16.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 2.04 | +0.2 |
| 2000 | 23 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 4 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 25.0% | 8.3% | 16.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 2.10 | +0.2 |
| 2001 | 24 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 15 | 2 | 35 | 164 | 24 | 19 | 6 | 13% | 2.3 | 14.6% | 11.6% | 3.0% | 3.7% | 6.75 | 5.34 | -0.3 |
| 2001 | 24 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 15 | 2 | 35 | 164 | 24 | 19 | 6 | 13% | 2.3 | 14.6% | 11.6% | 3.0% | 3.7% | 6.75 | 5.61 | -0.4 |
| 2003 | 26 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6 | 5 | 22 | 108 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 83% | 3.7 | 13.9% | 5.6% | 8.3% | 0.9% | 6.55 | 3.14 | +0.6 |
| 2003 | 26 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 6 | 5 | 22 | 108 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 83% | 3.7 | 13.9% | 5.6% | 8.3% | 0.9% | 6.55 | 3.15 | +0.6 |
| 2004 | 27 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 31 | 26 | 133 | 610 | 92 | 60 | 22 | 84% | 4.3 | 15.1% | 9.8% | 5.2% | 3.6% | 6.50 | 5.05 | +0.5 |
| 2004 | 27 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 31 | 26 | 133 | 610 | 92 | 60 | 22 | 84% | 4.3 | 15.1% | 9.8% | 5.2% | 3.6% | 6.50 | 5.22 | +0.3 |
| 2005 | 28 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 44 | 0 | 81 | 369 | 52 | 39 | 5 | 0% | 1.8 | 14.1% | 10.6% | 3.5% | 1.4% | 4.43 | 3.99 | +0.5 |
| 2005 | 28 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 44 | 0 | 81 | 369 | 52 | 39 | 5 | 0% | 1.8 | 14.1% | 10.6% | 3.5% | 1.4% | 4.43 | 4.06 | +0.5 |
| 2006 | 29 | MLB MLE | Pittsburgh Pirates | 20 | 0 | 38 | 178 | 27 | 14 | 2 | 0% | 1.9 | 15.2% | 7.9% | 7.3% | 1.1% | 6.39 | 3.43 | +0.5 |
| 2006 | 29 | MLB RAW | Pittsburgh Pirates | 20 | 0 | 38 | 178 | 27 | 14 | 2 | 0% | 1.9 | 15.2% | 7.9% | 7.3% | 1.1% | 6.39 | 3.47 | +0.5 |
| 2011 | 34 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 30 | 28 | 180 | 752 | 139 | 55 | 15 | 93% | 6.0 | 18.5% | 7.3% | 11.2% | 2.2% | 2.71 | 3.65 | +3.8 |
| 2011 | 34 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 30 | 28 | 180 | 752 | 139 | 55 | 15 | 93% | 6.0 | 18.5% | 7.3% | 11.2% | 2.0% | 2.71 | 3.56 | +4.0 |
| 2012 | 35 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 31 | 31 | 190 | 788 | 158 | 55 | 17 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.1% | 7.0% | 13.1% | 2.3% | 3.37 | 3.57 | +4.2 |
| 2012 | 35 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 31 | 31 | 190 | 788 | 158 | 55 | 17 | 100% | 6.1 | 20.1% | 7.0% | 13.1% | 2.2% | 3.37 | 3.47 | +4.5 |
| 2013 | 36 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 19 | 19 | 104 | 467 | 67 | 36 | 15 | 100% | 5.5 | 14.3% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 3.5% | 5.73 | 4.77 | +0.7 |
| 2013 | 36 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 19 | 19 | 104 | 467 | 67 | 36 | 15 | 100% | 5.5 | 14.3% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 3.2% | 5.73 | 4.73 | +0.8 |
| 2014 | 37 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 32 | 32 | 185 | 780 | 151 | 56 | 18 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.4% | 7.2% | 12.2% | 2.5% | 4.00 | 3.74 | +3.7 |
| 2014 | 37 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 32 | 32 | 185 | 780 | 151 | 56 | 18 | 100% | 5.8 | 19.4% | 7.2% | 12.2% | 2.3% | 4.00 | 3.64 | +3.9 |
| 2015 | 38 | MLB MLE | San Francisco Giants | 33 | 22 | 135 | 598 | 108 | 56 | 17 | 67% | 4.1 | 18.1% | 9.4% | 8.7% | 3.1% | 4.67 | 4.45 | +1.5 |
| 2015 | 38 | MLB RAW | San Francisco Giants | 33 | 22 | 135 | 598 | 108 | 56 | 17 | 67% | 4.1 | 18.1% | 9.4% | 8.7% | 2.8% | 4.67 | 4.38 | +1.6 |
| 2016 | 39 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 28 | 18 | 104 | 448 | 69 | 41 | 15 | 64% | 3.7 | 16.7% | 10.4% | 6.3% | 3.2% | 4.40 | 4.79 | +0.7 |
| 2016 | 39 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 28 | 18 | 104 | 448 | 69 | 41 | 15 | 64% | 3.7 | 15.4% | 9.2% | 6.3% | 3.3% | 4.40 | 4.83 | +0.7 |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 289 | 179 | 1190 | 5204 | 900 | 436 | 129 | 62% | 4.1 | 17.3% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 2.5% | 4.48 | 4.10 | +18.4 | ||
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 289 | 179 | 1190 | 5204 | 900 | 436 | 129 | 62% | 4.1 | 17.3% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 2.5% | 4.48 | 4.06 | +18.9 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 49 | 30 | 200 | 875 | 151 | 73 | 22 | 62% | 4.1 | 17.3% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 2.5% | 4.48 | 4.06 | +3.2 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 293 | 183 | 1212 | 5286 | 914 | 445 | 139 | 62% | 4.1 | 17.3% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 4.45 | 4.15 | +18.4 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 48 | 30 | 200 | 872 | 151 | 73 | 23 | 62% | 4.1 | 17.3% | 8.4% | 8.9% | 2.6% | 4.45 | 4.15 | +3.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2016 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 11 IPFIP 6.52 → 7.33 (+0.81)K% 9.5% → 8.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 9.52% | — | ×0.880 | 8.38% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 2.38% | — | ×1.050 | 2.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 7.14% | ÷0.933 | ×1.100 | 8.42% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 87).
Result: FIP 6.52 → 7.33, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAltoona Curve · 11 IPFIP 4.26 → 4.73 (+0.47)K% 10.0% → 8.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 10.00% | — | ×0.810 | 8.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.00% | — | ×1.100 | 5.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.50% | ÷1.016 | ×1.200 | 2.95% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 4.26 → 4.73, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).