Nolan Clenney

P Knoxville Smokies

Age 31 RHP 6'2" / 200 lbs AA

Overview

AAPROSPECT

MLB%2%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	27	MIX2 levels	37	64	5.62	3.96	27.6%	9.9%	—	K 23.0% · BB 10.1% · FIP 4.76
2024	28	AANYM	33	54	5.37	3.16	24.8%	6.2%	—	K 20.1% · BB 6.8% · FIP 4.23
2025	29	MIX3 levels	14	26	4.21	4.62	13.7%	12.8%	—	K 8.3% · BB 18.3% · FIP 5.65
2027PROJ	31	MLBCHC	14	15	5.01	5.01	18.0%	11.2%	-0.1
2028PROJ31% MLB	32	MLBCHC	6	6	5.08	5.17	18.1%	11.5%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsJim Miller (age 30) · Miguel Mejia (age 31) · Neil Wagner (age 32)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 128120vR 112

ERA5.01

FIP5.01

K%18.0%

BB%11.2%

K-BB%6.8%

Proj IP15

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 15 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2021	25	MIX MLE	2 levels	17	0	28	113	37	7	2	0%	1.6	25.5%	8.4%	17.1%	3.1%	3.90	3.73	—
2021	25	MIX RAW	2 levels	17	0	28	113	37	7	2	0%	1.6	32.7%	6.2%	26.5%	1.8%	3.90	2.12	—
2022	26	A+ MLE	Brooklyn Cyclones	33	2	68	284	87	22	7	6%	2.1	23.6%	8.9%	14.7%	3.3%	4.92	4.06	—
2022	26	A+ RAW	Brooklyn Cyclones	33	2	68	284	87	22	7	6%	2.1	30.6%	7.7%	22.9%	2.5%	4.92	2.85	—
2023	27	MIX MLE	2 levels	37	0	64	293	81	29	10	0%	1.7	23.0%	10.1%	12.9%	4.2%	5.62	4.76	—
2023	27	MIX RAW	2 levels	37	0	64	293	81	29	10	0%	1.7	27.6%	9.9%	17.7%	3.4%	5.62	3.96	—
2024	28	AA MLE	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	33	0	54	242	60	15	6	0%	1.6	20.1%	6.8%	13.3%	3.6%	5.37	4.23	—
2024	28	AA MLE	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	33	0	54	242	60	15	6	0%	1.6	20.1%	6.8%	13.3%	3.6%	5.37	4.23	—
2024	28	AA RAW	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	33	0	54	242	60	15	6	0%	1.6	24.8%	6.2%	18.6%	2.5%	5.37	3.16	—
2025	29	MIX MLE	3 levels	14	0	26	117	16	15	2	0%	1.8	8.3%	18.3%	-10.0%	1.7%	4.21	5.65	—
2025	29	MIX MLE	3 levels	14	0	26	117	16	15	2	0%	1.8	8.3%	18.3%	-10.0%	1.7%	4.21	5.65	—
2025	29	MIX RAW	3 levels	14	0	26	117	16	15	2	0%	1.8	13.7%	12.8%	0.9%	1.7%	4.21	4.62	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	31	MLB	CHC	14	0	15	63	11	7	2	0%	1.1	18.0%	11.2%	6.8%	3.0%	5.01	5.01	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	32	MLB MLE	CHC	19	0	20	84	15	10	3	0%	1.1	18.1%	11.5%	6.7%	3.2%	5.08	5.17	-0.1
2028	32	MLB CTX	CHC	6	0	6	25	5	3	1	0%	1.0	18.1%	11.5%	6.7%	3.2%	5.08	5.17	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		6	0	6	26	5	3	1	0%	1.0	18.1%	11.5%	6.7%	3.2%	5.08	4.79	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	160	96	32	0%	1.1	18.1%	11.5%	6.7%	3.2%	5.08	4.79	-0.6
Career	—	MLE		134	2	239	1049	222	102	36	1%	1.8	21.1%	9.8%	11.4%	3.4%	5.02	4.44	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		112	2	200	879	186	86	30	1%	1.8	21.1%	9.8%	11.4%	3.4%	5.02	4.44	-1.4

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Nolan Clenney (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.01	18.0%	11.2%	3.0%	—	5.17	18.1%	6.7%	20	+0.16	—	—	—
Jim Miller R 2012 · 4.56 FIP	30	SU	4.56	20.9%	11.8%	3.1%	.243	3.95	18.8%	14.7%	74	-0.61	3.95	140	84
Miguel Mejia R 2019 · 4.41 FIP	31	SU	4.41	15.7%	10.7%	2.3%	.341	—	—	—	—	—	3.37	108	82
Neil Wagner R 2016 · 4.05 FIP	32	SU	4.05	19.8%	12.3%	1.9%	.360	3.11	20.7%	12.1%	54	-0.94	3.11	135	80
Angel Castro R 2015 · 4.50 FIP	32	SU	4.50	15.9%	8.0%	3.1%	.268	4.28	13.6%	5.5%	231	-0.22	3.51	292	80
Dustin Molleken R 2016 · 4.04 FIP	31	SU	4.04	19.6%	12.1%	1.9%	.276	3.38	24.3%	11.9%	16	-0.66	3.38	129	80
Mike Buddie R 2002 · 4.26 FIP	31	SU	4.26	15.1%	7.6%	2.7%	.297	—	—	—	—	—	3.76	123	79
Joe Nelson R 2006 · 3.91 FIP	31	SU	3.91	22.8%	10.4%	2.6%	.258	4.05	23.4%	12.8%	94	+0.14	3.08	139	78
Luis Angel Daniel R 2016 · 4.56 FIP	31	SU	4.56	13.4%	8.9%	2.7%	.286	4.16	9.8%	0.3%	53	-0.40	4.16	156	78
Rudy Gonzalez R 2015 · 4.52 FIP	34	SW	4.52	13.5%	9.6%	2.4%	.347	3.84	14.0%	6.5%	79	-0.68	3.31	119	78
Ivan Zavala R 2017 · 5.02 FIP	30	SU	5.02	12.8%	8.0%	3.6%	.286	5.15	12.7%	5.3%	61	+0.13	4.27	209	77
Ryan Kelly R 2019 · 4.33 FIP	31	SU	4.33	14.7%	7.2%	2.8%	.307	—	—	—	—	—	2.49	131	76
Scott Atchison R 2007 · 4.55 FIP	31	SU	4.55	19.1%	7.6%	3.8%	.297	4.59	16.2%	9.5%	60	+0.04	2.52	340	75
Mike Broadway R 2018 · 4.65 FIP	31	SU	4.65	23.0%	10.6%	3.9%	.282	—	—	—	—	—	1.74	195	75
Jeff Fulchino R 2011 · 4.44 FIP	31	SU	4.44	20.4%	11.1%	3.0%	.302	—	—	—	—	—	3.36	178	75
Rodney Myers R 2001 · 4.70 FIP	32	SU	4.70	13.7%	9.5%	2.8%	.301	3.98	10.9%	1.0%	21	-0.72	3.98	218	74
Dalier Hinojosa R 2016 · 4.30 FIP	30	SU	4.30	18.7%	12.6%	2.2%	.329	—	—	—	—	—	3.41	104	74
Tyler Sturdevant R 2017 · 4.48 FIP	31	SU	4.48	13.5%	6.7%	3.0%	.300	—	—	—	—	—	3.44	149	74
Juan Sandoval R 2015 · 3.82 FIP	34	SU	3.82	15.4%	6.0%	2.3%	.294	3.33	17.4%	8.8%	116	-0.49	3.24	225	73
Evan Meek R 2014 · 4.41 FIP	31	SU	4.41	15.0%	9.3%	2.5%	.295	3.13	17.8%	8.1%	38	-1.28	3.13	234	73
Fredy Quintero R 2019 · 4.62 FIP	31	SU	4.62	17.2%	13.7%	2.2%	.310	—	—	—	—	—	4.29	241	73