Brooks Crawford

P Chattanooga Lookouts

Age 30 RHP 6'4" / 246 lbs AA

Overview

AAPROSPECT

MLB%2%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	26	MIX2 levels	40	0	85	3.38	4.00	23.4%	9.2%	—	K 18.0% · BB 10.7% · FIP 5.10
2024	27	MIX2 levels	37	1	72	3.98	4.01	24.3%	12.0%	—	K 19.9% · BB 12.3% · FIP 4.51
2025	28	AACIN	15	0	25	8.28	5.26	17.7%	12.4%	—	K 14.3% · BB 13.6% · FIP 5.90
2027PROJ	30	MLBCIN	20	0	21	5.07	5.07	18.9%	11.8%	-0.1
2028PROJ31% MLB	31	MLBCIN	6	0	6	5.11	5.19	19.0%	11.9%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.2Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsWirfin Obispo (age 30) · Jim Miller (age 30) · Esteban Haro (age 30)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 129121vR 113

ERA5.07

FIP5.07

K%18.9%

BB%11.8%

K-BB%7.1%

Proj IP21

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 21 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2019	22	ROK MLE	AZL Giants Black	12	0	15	64	14	7	1	0%	1.2	14.9%	13.7%	1.2%	2.2%	6.14	4.78	—
2019	22	ROK RAW	AZL Giants Black	12	0	15	64	14	7	1	0%	1.2	21.9%	10.9%	10.9%	1.6%	6.14	3.51	—
2021	24	A MLE	San Jose Giants	32	0	46	184	57	7	2	0%	1.4	22.9%	4.5%	18.4%	1.4%	1.96	2.50	—
2021	24	A RAW	San Jose Giants	32	0	46	184	57	7	2	0%	1.4	31.0%	3.8%	27.2%	1.1%	1.96	1.64	—
2022	25	A+ MLE	Eugene Emeralds	43	0	57	230	64	20	7	0%	1.3	21.4%	10.0%	11.4%	3.4%	3.18	4.42	—
2022	25	A+ RAW	Eugene Emeralds	43	0	57	230	64	20	7	0%	1.3	27.8%	8.7%	19.1%	3.0%	3.18	3.51	—
2023	26	MIX MLE	2 levels	40	0	85	346	81	32	11	0%	2.1	18.0%	10.7%	7.3%	3.9%	3.38	5.10	—
2023	26	MIX RAW	2 levels	40	0	85	346	81	32	11	0%	2.1	23.4%	9.2%	14.2%	3.2%	3.38	4.00	—
2024	27	MIX MLE	2 levels	37	1	72	300	73	36	8	3%	2.0	19.9%	12.3%	7.6%	2.8%	3.98	4.51	—
2024	27	MIX MLE	2 levels	37	1	72	300	73	36	8	3%	2.0	19.9%	12.3%	7.6%	2.8%	3.98	4.51	—
2024	27	MIX RAW	2 levels	37	1	72	300	73	36	8	3%	2.0	24.3%	12.0%	12.3%	2.7%	3.98	4.01	—
2025	28	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	15	0	25	113	20	14	4	0%	1.7	14.3%	13.6%	0.7%	4.2%	8.28	5.90	—
2025	28	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	15	0	25	113	20	14	4	0%	1.7	14.3%	13.6%	0.7%	4.2%	8.28	5.90	—
2025	28	AA RAW	Chattanooga Lookouts	15	0	25	113	20	14	4	0%	1.7	17.7%	12.4%	5.3%	3.5%	8.28	5.26	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	30	MLB	CIN	20	0	21	89	17	10	3	0%	1.1	18.9%	11.8%	7.1%	3.1%	5.07	5.07	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	31	MLB MLE	CIN	19	0	20	84	16	10	3	0%	1.1	19.0%	11.9%	7.1%	3.3%	5.11	5.19	-0.1
2028	31	MLB CTX	CIN	6	0	6	25	5	3	1	0%	1.0	19.0%	11.9%	7.1%	3.3%	5.11	5.19	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		6	0	6	26	5	3	1	0%	1.0	19.0%	11.9%	7.1%	3.3%	5.11	4.81	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	160	96	32	0%	1.1	19.0%	11.9%	7.1%	3.3%	5.11	4.81	-0.6
Career	—	MLE		179	1	300	1237	239	129	39	1%	1.7	19.4%	10.5%	8.9%	3.1%	3.81	4.50	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		119	1	200	825	160	86	26	1%	1.7	19.4%	10.5%	8.9%	3.1%	3.81	4.50	-1.5

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Brooks Crawford (OGILVIE)	—	—	5.07	18.9%	11.8%	3.1%	—	5.19	19.0%	7.1%	20	+0.12	—	—	—
Wirfin Obispo R 2015 · 4.80 FIP	30	SU	4.80	18.6%	12.2%	3.1%	.292	1.31	28.6%	24.5%	126	-3.49	1.30	218	93
Jim Miller R 2012 · 4.56 FIP	30	SU	4.56	20.9%	11.8%	3.1%	.243	3.95	18.8%	14.7%	74	-0.61	3.95	140	87
Esteban Haro R 2016 · 4.55 FIP	30	SU	4.55	17.1%	10.2%	2.9%	.338	3.83	11.6%	6.3%	75	-0.72	3.76	164	83
Joe Nelson R 2006 · 3.91 FIP	31	SU	3.91	22.8%	10.4%	2.6%	.258	4.05	23.4%	12.8%	94	+0.14	3.08	139	81
Angel Castro R 2015 · 4.50 FIP	32	SU	4.50	15.9%	8.0%	3.1%	.268	4.28	13.6%	5.5%	231	-0.22	3.51	292	80
Neil Wagner R 2013 · 4.02 FIP	29	SU	4.02	20.5%	7.5%	3.1%	.306	4.05	19.8%	7.5%	43	+0.03	3.11	135	78
Erik Davis R 2017 · 4.25 FIP	30	SU	4.25	22.2%	11.1%	3.0%	.349	3.52	17.4%	8.5%	65	-0.73	3.05	227	77
Carlos Fisher R 2011 · 4.33 FIP	28	SU	4.33	15.5%	9.1%	2.5%	.275	—	—	—	—	—	2.48	245	77
Mike Broadway R 2017 · 4.73 FIP	30	SU	4.73	18.3%	10.2%	3.4%	.245	4.65	23.0%	12.4%	49	-0.08	1.74	195	76
Ivan Zavala R 2017 · 5.02 FIP	30	SU	5.02	12.8%	8.0%	3.6%	.286	5.15	12.7%	5.3%	61	+0.13	4.27	209	76
Wil Browning R 2017 · 4.44 FIP	28	SU	4.44	17.9%	13.1%	2.2%	.359	—	—	—	—	—	2.14	162	76
Ronald Peña R 2021 · 4.49 FIP	29	SU	4.49	16.5%	10.4%	2.7%	.288	—	—	—	—	—	3.72	187	75
Scott Atchison R 2007 · 4.55 FIP	31	SU	4.55	19.1%	7.6%	3.8%	.297	4.59	16.2%	9.5%	60	+0.04	2.52	340	75
Beck Wheeler R 2017 · 5.40 FIP	28	SU	5.40	15.3%	12.2%	3.7%	.347	—	—	—	—	—	3.46	173	75
Dalier Hinojosa R 2016 · 4.30 FIP	30	SU	4.30	18.7%	12.6%	2.2%	.329	—	—	—	—	—	3.41	104	75
Brandon Puffer R 2004 · 5.23 FIP	28	SU	5.23	13.5%	11.2%	3.4%	.328	—	—	—	—	—	3.55	108	74
Drew Hayes R 2016 · 3.99 FIP	28	SU	3.99	13.8%	10.1%	1.4%	.302	—	—	—	—	—	3.35	117	74
Willie Eyre R 2007 · 4.53 FIP	29	SU	4.53	13.7%	9.1%	2.6%	.306	2.87	11.1%	5.5%	18	-1.66	2.87	164	73
Adrian Garza R 2017 · 4.47 FIP	29	SU	4.47	16.0%	7.0%	3.4%	.351	5.18	9.7%	4.1%	113	+0.71	3.94	229	73
Ryan Doolittle R 2016 · 4.38 FIP	28	SU	4.38	13.9%	7.1%	2.8%	.269	—	—	—	—	—	4.03	101	73